In acquitting Lt. Rice of manslaughter, the most serious count, Judge Williams said prosecutors didn’t prove the lieutenant knew he created a high risk of death or serious injury by failing to place Mr. Gray in a seat belt—let alone that the officer consciously disregarded such risk. In addition, the judge said prosecutors didn’t prove Lt. Rice’s actions caused Mr. Gray’s death. The judge said a similar analysis helped lead him to a not-guilty finding on reckless endangerment, though he also said the charge didn’t apply in this case for technical reasons.
Judge Williams said it may have been a mistake or bad judgment not putting Mr. Gray in a seat belt, but prosecutors didn’t show it rose to the level of a crime. “Failing to seat-belt a detainee in a transport wagon is not inherently criminal conduct,” he said before acquitting Lt. Rice of misconduct.
Regarding Lt. Rice’s decision to have Mr. Gray’s legs shackled before he was put face down on the van floor, Judge Williams said “There are a number of possibilities the court could entertain, some that are innocent and some that are not. However, the burden of proof rests with the state, and the court’s imaginings do not serve as a substitute for evidence.” -
WSJ