Do you have to ask?
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/09/03/kentucky-clerk-am-prepared-to-go-to-jail.html?intcmp=hpbt4
Comment section, now.
"foxnews.com/opinion" is enough to turn me off of clicking it.
Do you have to ask?
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/09/03/kentucky-clerk-am-prepared-to-go-to-jail.html?intcmp=hpbt4
Comment section, now.
This is a twist worthy of 7 o'clock news. She's pretty fucked up in the head if she's willing to alienate her own son like this.
You made it sound like the adultery due to divorce was not a correct interpretation of the bible, yet one of the largest denominations disagrees. I also thinks it's fair to call her out on it since I don't think she'd be too happy if she had to drive from county to county to find a clerk who would judge her morals.
Not constitutionally they aren't. And being as this is going to be a legal argument thing we'd have to look hard at the constitution. Obviously in practice this is exactly what they do, but it doesn't have a constitutional basis. That is apparent from the provision about a "vacancy in the office" ...
... so we'd need to consider whether the Clerk is "absent" independently of whether in practice the rest of the office is getting the day-to-day job done.
Another consideration is 402.100(1)(a) and (c):
Notice that in (c) the signature may be that of the clerk or a deputy - but in (a) the authorisation statement must be that of the clerk - a deputy will not do. That's the bit where the judge/executive needs to take over. But otherwise ...
Are you arguing that being born again nulls all present and future sins?
I personally don't feel like arguing this anymore.
Been saying this the whole time. She can't get money through fundraising sites for illegal activities (which this is).
Been saying this the whole time. She can't get money through fundraising sites for illegal activities (which this is).
There's one out there specifically for fundies that got around this to support one of those homophobic bakeries a few months back. Their TOS didn't seem to mention anything about illegal activities.
There's one out there specifically for fundies that got around this to support one of those homophobic bakeries a few months back. Their TOS didn't seem to mention anything about illegal activities.
Who plays Kim Davis in the movie? Kathy Bates? Margo Martindale? Ann Dowd?
Who plays Kim Davis in the movie? Kathy Bates? Margo Martindale? Ann Dowd?
There's one out there specifically for fundies that got around this to support one of those homophobic bakeries a few months back. Their TOS didn't seem to mention anything about illegal activities.
Can't they just seize these donations since they funded illegal activities and sue (and possibly arrest) the owners of the site?
Well deserved.
Who plays Kim Davis in the movie? Kathy Bates? Margo Martindale? Ann Dowd?
Who plays Kim Davis in the movie? Kathy Bates? Margo Martindale? Ann Dowd?
No contest
For the love of god, every thread about this: Who cares if a bunch of bigots get together to make another bigot rich?
This money isn't appearing out of thin air! Bigots who hate gay people already had this money! It's a zero-sum game in the bigot economy, the bigots are not getting rich off of this, their just transferring their bigot wealth.
I don't care if this lady makes $1 Billion Bigot-Bucks outta this deal, because the law of the land regarding equal marriage will have been upheld and a bunch of other bigots will be $1 Billion worse off.
Now I'm going to have nightmares..
Awwwww
not sure if already posted, but her lawyers on Facebook:
Way to generalize.The fake humbleness is what kills me the most. (aside from the thoughts that would be considered delusional if you removed the religious aspect)
not sure if already posted, but her lawyers on Facebook:
Way to generalize.
That's my bad then, I misunderstood.That was about one specific editorial and how it was written; not every religious person talks in humble-brags and confusing double-speak. Ironically you accusing me of generalizing is sort of assuming that all religious people act the same way.
That's my bad then, I misunderstood.
Well now she's really been turned into a hero/martyr for the right... Great.
Well now she's really been turned into a hero/martyr for the right... Great.
Daaaamn.not sure if already posted, but her lawyers on Facebook:
It is. Now they have to explain why believing the law should be inferior to religious ideology is the proper course for America, and how that is any different from the Sharia law they claim to hate so much.
It is. Now they have to explain why believing the law should be inferior to religious ideology is the proper course for America, and how that is any different from the Sharia law they claim to hate so much.
Well now she's really been turned into a hero/martyr for the right... Great.
They asked him earlier about it and said he had no knowledge of this news story and had no comment. Might be another day at least before he has an official stance on this.Still no comment from Trump, eh? This is a pretty big fork in the road.
Well now she's really been turned into a hero/martyr for the right... Great.