Lys Skygge
Member
Getting a Hitchcock vibe! Have you tried adding one in post?
I honestly didn't catch it until I posted here. But I think I might just do that
Getting a Hitchcock vibe! Have you tried adding one in post?
sam_0473-IR.jpg by Adam Fairclough, on Flickr
IMG_2195-Edit.jpg by Adam Fairclough, on Flickr
sam_0458-IR.jpg by Adam Fairclough, on Flickr
IMG_2211.jpg by Adam Fairclough, on Flickr
cool IR shots, you mentioned using a modded camera. How'd you do that?
Some great photos in this thread. Just started taking photos again and messing around with photoshop the last couple of weeks, enjoying it so much I decided to buy a new camera which should be here later in the week hopefully.
Some stuff from the last few days.
![]()
![]()
Photoshopped, just switching out the red and blue colour channels in the first. Red and green in the second.Are these photoshopped or are you using an IR filter? The bottom one looks like old Kodak Aerochrome IR film.
That girls eyes look awesome, they are contacts? Is Flickr the best place to upload photos these days? I have still just been using abload.
More colour tomfoolery.
![]()
New camera showed up this morning so it was time for an exciting photoshoot... of the washing line, I'll go out later in the week once I have figured out the labyrinthine menu system on the damn thing and try some more interesting targets.
![]()
I bought a canon eos d1000 today on eBay. I know it's old, and it's not the best thing on earth, but it was priced surprisingly OK (130 Euros) and comes with a bunch of stuff.
I never planned this, it was as spontaneous as probably possible, and I still ponder the buy, but what the hell. Never had a reflex camera before. Gonna be fun
Should I store my stuff on flickr or a tumblr or something? Everyone here seems to use flickr.
I bought a canon eos d1000 today on eBay. I know it's old, and it's not the best thing on earth, but it was priced surprisingly OK (130 Euros) and comes with a bunch of stuff.
I never planned this, it was as spontaneous as probably possible, and I still ponder the buy, but what the hell. Never had a reflex camera before. Gonna be fun
Should I store my stuff on flickr or a tumblr or something? Everyone here seems to use flickr.
Literally dismantle the camera until you can see the sensor , there is usually a little plate of glass sitting infront of the sensor. This is the IR filter, remove this and reassemble and you have a camera that is no longer blocking IR light.
You then start getting weird colour photos as the sensor is seeing both the regular wavelengths of light and now a load of IR light.
You then put a filter on the front or infront of your lens that blocks out a chunk of the visible light and you are left with just a certain portion of IR light as your image.
NO.Would you guys recommend Samsung NX Mini? I need to take various depth of field shots.
Ha, sounds like quite the project did you do this to the camera you mainly use or do you know have a IR camera?
Thanks for the information, would rather go with the Sony A5000 or with NX3000? Both have the same size sensor.NO.
Man up and buy a NX3000! (preferably with the 16-50mm lens) It's not a lot more money and now that's a very good camera. Don't skim on details like that.
![]()
Proper SLR sensor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compact camera sensor.
And no, it won't feel way bigger:
![]()
![]()
There's something about film shots that digital can't quite emulate. These are great.So I've been shooting 35mm on a Pentax K1000 & 50mm Lens. It's been a blast also about 20 years from my last roll of film. Not only is the look amazing but I really slow down and compose before I snap the shutter.
There's something about film shots that digital can't quite emulate. These are great.
Fëanorian;165803600 said:Getting paid to take pictures of a co-workers cat, so I'm getting some practice with a friends cat.
I would still go with that Samsung.Thanks for the information, would rather go with the Sony A5000 or with NX3000? Both have the same size sensor.
At 16mm it records 2,327 lines per picture height on a center-weighted sharpness test, which is better than the 1,800 lines we use to mark an image as sharp. The outer edges of the image are often a problem area with compact zoom lenses like this, as we've seen with the Sony 16-50mm Retractable Zoom and Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ. But even at f/3.5 it scores 1,962 lines. There's a moderate improvement in sharpness at f/4 (2,402 lines) and resolution peaks at f/5.6 (2,552 lines).
At the 24mm position the maximum aperture narrows to f/4 and the lens shows 2,422 lines on a center-weighted test, with edges that top 2,000 lines. There's moderate improvement at f/5.6 (2,516 lines). The story is about the same at 35mm f/5 (2,655 lines) and f/8 (2,794 lines). At 50mm f/5.6 the lens scores 2,636 lines and improves a bit at f/8 (2,755 lines). If you shoot in JPG mode distortion is automatically corrected, but if you work in Raw you'll have to contend with about 2.4 percent barrel distortion at 16mm.
Source: http://uk.pcmag.com/sony-16-50mm-re...134/review/sony-16-50mm-retractable-zoom-lensAt its widest aperture and the midpoint of its zoom, 33mm, it just barely hits the 1,800 lines per picture height that we used to mark a sharp photo—at 16mm it scores 1,666 lines and it drops back down to 1,663 lines at 50mm. Closing the aperture down to f/8 improves the score—that gets you 1,802 lines at 16mm, 1,885 lines at 33mm, and 1,777 lines at 50mm. Shooting at a smaller aperture won't be a problem in decent light, although it will limit your ability to create a shallow depth of field. The lens is optically stabilized, but if the light gets dim you will likely be shooting at its maximum aperture.
(...) you'll notice that shots at 16mm have a distinct fisheye look to them. At that setting the lens shows a ridiculous amount of barrel distortion—9 percent
The 16-50mm lens is where it's at.Also the NX3000 comes in different packages, power zoom and compact zoom. Which one is recommend for a light weight lens?
Thanks.
travel position:
![]()
Uncollapsed/maximum lenght:
![]()