I slept on it, and you know what, no. You guys are definitely blowing this out of proportion and I would be extremely wary of anyone trying to ride this "oh god you've hurt us so bad!" reasoning to the lynch (roy's post above stands out.) How many hard fact conclusions have we drawn from my supposed N1 switch?
-Ouro's second drink was lost. I claimed responsibility for it and I told him directly.
-Scrafty was on table 1, so no reads misinformation
-The trackers were on table 1, so no activity misinformation
Anything else? You keep saying I led you down the wrong direction, but I've done nothing of the sort. If anyone had any real information, then I would agree, but my reveal made us go from being confused to being only slightly confused. Besides which, if you think town was reeling from this, I would imagine scum was feeling at the very least the same way up until now.
What is your take on this?
Take into account that launch actually thinks he protected you from a scum kill, not that he protected someone else from you.
No, I don't think that's what happened; that was my intent, but since bringing this claim forward and have others weigh on it, if Ty4on claimed ordinary and scum believed him, there's a very small chance he would have been targeted over other roles.
For Launch I'm now especially curious about targeting Fire. You seemed to hint at it in D2 with a slight town read (asking why people voted him D1). I'd also still like your answers about D2 thoughts, especially now that they tie better into your role.
My D2 intent was to block weemad; when the tide turned, it went to protecting Fireblend. It was a last minute decision. Truthfully, I didn't know much of what to make of Fireblend at that point. He plays like town, with few exceptions, and I don't have reason to believe he has done anything untowards. Seeing as how he was blocked and has no response to that, plus he didn't move on N4, I think he's ordinary town.
Okay... let's see.
Launch, what the hell? If you are really a jailor, why did you claim a role that was going to be this easy to prove to be real or not? You should've thought that out much better, claiming a role that would potentially mess up 50% of roles targeting (when you claimed, you didn't know of any powers) would be easily found out to be true or not true.
However... I don't know what to think. This Jailor claim would finally explain what happened to those disappeared drinks, and Launch's "gotcha" moment on AB yesterday. It would explain some of his actions, while not others. So I have to think about this.
Was it easy to disprove? It took us this long.
If Launch is town, then scum has a roleblocker. No way does the town have two Roleblocker-type of powers.
I'm returning my vote for now to BSP.
VOTE: BananaSpacePrincess
I need to think through the implications of Launch'es claim.
Ok, actually, I think this is valid, so let me throw my suspicions out there.
I'm assuming the RB has the same table restrictions as me. As such, we have definitive instance of a player being blocked (Camjo) on N3. So, looking at the first table for D3 end, crossing out the names that we know aren't the RB:
Time
BSP
Fireblend
Roy
RNH/Seath
I actually remember scratching out Roy's name from this list at one point, but I don't remember why. Maybe it was a mistake. I scratched out Fireblend for the above reasoning, that he's probably ordinary based on the lack of response to my action and the lack of activity N4. The RB is almost definitely among the four left over.