Some new music video pics
Ew.
This track sounds like an American Eagle threw up all over Lady Gaga.
omggg gaf wake up I'll kill u all!
This is me containing myself tonight. This is me not getting B&.
Yeah sis keep it chill. I saw you getting ready to scalp that one poster in the thread. lol
I MEAN BUT REALLY. She is older so what, put it away? That's some fucked up misogynistic bullshit. He/She should be so lucky.
Totally agree. Educate them!
Hm I had a momenT with Feels So Good earlier. KMO is kind of growing on me, the production is pretty stellar
sorry to sass earlier plz enjoy
d it's fine I was asking for it
Heehee, can't wait to hear your fav tracks once you warm up!
Well the ones I already liked were
If Only
Les Sex
Kiss Me Once
Fine
but now you can add Million Miles & Feels So Good to that
Surprisingly, my most listened to track on KMO is still "I Was Gonna Cancel".
She should make that a single while Pharell's production (for other people) is still on fire.
Hell yeah! MILL E ON!
Is everyone seeing the slut shaming and misogyny going on in the Sexercize thread? Is that real? I only pay attention to Kylie threads so if that happens all the time that's fucked.
Surprisingly, my most listened to track on KMO is still "I Was Gonna Cancel".
She should make that a single while Pharell's production (for other people) is still on fire.
Patrick is slaying that Kylie thread.
Those music threads always have these dumbass posts saying "THIS IS NOT HIS/HER BEST THING, WHY." Like really bitch? Why do we INSIST on wanting an artist's brand new material to take a proverbial SHITE on everything he/she has done before? Why is that the sole metric for judging a song? If it's not their all-time best (especially for someone like Kylie, who's had a decade-plus' worth of material) then why are we holding it against them?
Saying this song isn't as good as, say, Get You Out Of My Head, doesn't change the fact that GYOMH is still Kylie's song. It's hers, and she fucking made it, and you obviously fucking like it so why do you want everything she does after that to make you think less of that song? Saying "this isn't her best" shouldn't be used as an insult to the artist but as a compliment to the material of hers that you like more. It's as if the further in the past a great song is, the less it belongs to the artist who made it. It's the reason we throw artists into the "legacy" pile so often, and it's because we start to separate say new Paul McCartney songs to his classic material. As if Paul McCartney back in the 60s is a different artist than Paul McCartney in 2013. He's the same bitch, and that attitude is such bullshit.
Bottom line: Comparing new material to an artist's subjective "best" is just really fucking poisonous, and it shows a complete lack of perception towards how artists actually create music and evolve. Kylie doesn't want to make another GYOMH; Beyonce doesn't need to make another Crazy in Love; Britney doesn't need to make another Toxic. Why? Because they're already made you twat. Enjoy them for what they are, and let new sounds in.
Patrick is slaying that Kylie thread.
Those music threads always have these dumbass posts saying "THIS IS NOT HIS/HER BEST THING, WHY." Like really bitch? Why do we INSIST on wanting an artist's brand new material to take a proverbial SHITE on everything he/she has done before? Why is that the sole metric for judging a song? If it's not their all-time best (especially for someone like Kylie, who's had a decade-plus' worth of material) then why are we holding it against them?
Saying this song isn't as good as, say, Get You Out Of My Head, doesn't change the fact that GYOMH is still Kylie's song. It's hers, and she fucking made it, and you obviously fucking like it so why do you want everything she does after that to make you think less of that song? Saying "this isn't her best" shouldn't be used as an insult to the artist but as a compliment to the material of hers that you like more. It's as if the further in the past a great song is, the less it belongs to the artist who made it. It's the reason we throw artists into the "legacy" pile so often, and it's because we start to separate say new Paul McCartney songs to his classic material. As if Paul McCartney back in the 60s is a different artist than Paul McCartney in 2013. He's the same bitch, and that attitude is such bullshit.
Bottom line: Comparing new material to an artist's subjective "best" is just really fucking poisonous, and it shows a complete lack of perception towards how artists actually create music and evolve. Kylie doesn't want to make another GYOMH; Beyonce doesn't need to make another Crazy in Love; Britney doesn't need to make another Toxic. Why? Because they're already made you twat. Enjoy them for what they are, and let new sounds in.
Girl did you really just quote my entire post just to give me lazy shade
lol.These passive aggressive fumes though.
Patrick is slaying that Kylie thread.
Those music threads always have these dumbass posts saying "THIS IS NOT HIS/HER BEST THING, WHY." Like really bitch? Why do we INSIST on wanting an artist's brand new material to take a proverbial SHITE on everything he/she has done before? Why is that the sole metric for judging a song? If it's not their all-time best (especially for someone like Kylie, who's had a decade-plus' worth of material) then why are we holding it against them?
Saying this song isn't as good as, say, Get You Out Of My Head, doesn't change the fact that GYOMH is still Kylie's song. It's hers, and she fucking made it, and you obviously fucking like it so why do you want everything she does after that to make you think less of that song? Saying "this isn't her best" shouldn't be used as an insult to the artist but as a compliment to the material of hers that you like more. It's as if the further in the past a great song is, the less it belongs to the artist who made it. It's the reason we throw artists into the "legacy" pile so often, and it's because we start to separate say new Paul McCartney songs to his classic material. As if Paul McCartney back in the 60s is a different artist than Paul McCartney in 2013. He's the same bitch, and that attitude is such bullshit.
Bottom line: Comparing new material to an artist's subjective "best" is just really fucking poisonous, and it shows a complete lack of perception towards how artists actually create music and evolve. Kylie doesn't want to make another GYOMH; Beyonce doesn't need to make another Crazy in Love; Britney doesn't need to make another Toxic. Why? Because they're already made you twat. Enjoy them for what they are, and let new sounds in.
What annoys me the most is the notion that Miley Cyrus invented using her body as an advertising tool and anyone that now dares to show a bit of flesh or do something other than sit on a chair and strum on a guitar is desperate for relevance and a feeble attempt to keep up with the younger girls.
The ignorance is astounding.