It's bullshit though. First because Robert declared Joffrey his rightful heir, and second because if Stannis is right about the throne belonging to whoever was next in line then he should be trying to find Dany across the sea and reinstall the Targaryens, not help Robert in his rebellion. In helping Robert's rebellion he proved that the king shouldn't actually be about lineage, but about who would make the best leader. And it should have been clear to him that Renly would make a better leader since people actually liked Renly, but Stannis' pride got in the way.
It's bullshit though. First because Robert declared Joffrey his rightful heir, and second because if Stannis is right about the throne belonging to whoever was next in line then he should be trying to find Dany across the sea and reinstall the Targaryens, not help Robert in his rebellion. In helping Robert's rebellion he proved that the king shouldn't actually be about lineage, but about who would make the best leader. And it should have been clear to him that Renly would make a better leader since people actually liked Renly, but Stannis' pride got in the way.
It's bullshit though. First because Robert declared Joffrey his rightful heir, and second because if Stannis is right about the throne belonging to whoever was next in line then he should be trying to find Dany across the sea and reinstall the Targaryens, not help Robert in his rebellion. In helping Robert's rebellion he proved that the king shouldn't actually be about lineage, but about who would make the best leader. And it should have been clear to him that Renly would make a better leader since people actually liked Renly, but Stannis' pride got in the way.
How is any of that bullshit? Robert didn't "declare" Joffrey his rightful heir, he was just his "rightful heir" because he was his son. However, because he actually wasn't his son than the next person in line was Stannis. Ned understood this and so did countless people. Hell, even Rendly understood this but he didn't give a shit.
Why would Dany be next? The Targaryens no longer rule Westeros, their lineage has no bearing on who should be ruler.
Do you really believe popular people make the best leaders?
How is any of that bullshit? Robert didn't "declare" Joffrey his rightful heir, he was just his "rightful heir" because he was his son. However, because he actually wasn't his son than the next person in line was Stannis. Ned understood this and so did countless people. Hell, even Rendly understood this but he didn't give a shit.
Why would Dany be next? The Targaryens no longer rule Westeros, their lineage has no bearing on who should be ruler.
Stannis is the only character that has a legit claim on the throne.
Hell, Gendry has a better claim than almost anyone else.
I think it takes all sorts of people to lead a country well and that the king is mostly a figurehead, and I believe Renly wasn't too stubborn to let other people help him lead well.
Why are we talking about Stannis?
He ded.
should we not talk about Jon Snow either?
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
TBH there is a bigger chance of Stannis still being alive than JonNo because we all know he's not.
TBH there is a bigger chance of Stannis still being alive than Jon
Why are we talking about Stannis?
He ded.
Does anyone else think it's really, really, really lame to bring characters back from the dead in fiction? I
Even if it's supported by the narrative, I still think it's a lame dramatic device. The dragonballs are an in-universe way of bringing Goku back from the dead but that doesn't stop it from sucking the tension out of every major death in that show. A bit of a stretched comparison but I think you get my point. Besides, I thought there was already going to be a seperate character who comes back from the dead and seeks revenge in GoT. Or maybe that got cut for the show?I agree but I think GoT is the big exception. If they bring Jon back it'll be because of the Red God's power and we know that he is able to do that from seeing it happen before. In a lot of fiction, they always give some bullshit excuse for why a character is being brought back to life but in GoT there's a great in universe explanation.
Also, I think it's also a bit different just because as viewers we're trained to expect beloved characters to get killed off and for us to never see any redemption from it. It'd be a nice twist on the formula to have a character finally prevail against GRRM.
The dragonballs are OP. You can go to a different planet with instant transmission or a space ship, collect the baws scattered on the planet, and revive someone who was disintegrated.Even if it's supported by the narrative, I still think it's a lame dramatic device. The dragonballs are an in-universe way of bringing Goku back from the dead but that doesn't stop it from sucking the tension out of every major death in that show. A bit of a stretched comparison but I think you get my point. Besides, I thought there was already going to be a seperate character who comes back from the dead and seeks revenge in GoT. Or maybe that got cut for the show?
I generally agree with you, with the exception of cases where the death actually meant something, for the character's development.Even if it's supported by the narrative, I still think it's a lame dramatic device. The dragonballs are an in-universe way of bringing Goku back from the dead but that doesn't stop it from sucking the tension out of every major death in that show. A bit of a stretched comparison but I think you get my point. Besides, I thought there was already going to be a seperate character who comes back from the dead and seeks revenge in GoT. Or maybe that got cut for the show?
Season Six Premiere. At Castle Black, Thorne defends his treason while Edd and Davos defend themselves. Sansa and Theon race the cold and the hounds.
It's bullshit though. First because Robert declared Joffrey his rightful heir, and second because if Stannis is right about the throne belonging to whoever was next in line then he should be trying to find Dany across the sea and reinstall the Targaryens, not help Robert in his rebellion. In helping Robert's rebellion he proved that the king shouldn't actually be about lineage, but about who would make the best leader. And it should have been clear to him that Renly would make a better leader since people actually liked Renly, but Stannis' pride got in the way.
Just because you decide a king burning everyone to death isn't the best leader doesn't mean you're suddenly going to ignore the legitimacy of claims to the throne. Especially when your claim is the strongest and everyone else is a pretender.
I'm not convinced Renly would have been a good king. He had to beat at a minimum two armies and it wasn't clear he could beat even one of them, and he likely would have struggled to produce heirs and not be seen as legitimate if rumors ever got out. And legitimacy issues when your claim is already weak isn't exactly great.
Agreed. Resurrections (and other OP magic) need to be limited. I'm fine with the show resurrecting Jon but I think that should be the only major character resurrection.Does anyone else think it's really, really, really lame to bring characters back from the dead in fiction? I always appreciated the feeling of finality when GoT offs someone, it always made some of the more surprising moments hit that much harder. Granted, none of us have even started this season yet but I just hope there's something more interesting going on with whatever resurrection takes place.
Just rewatched The Dance of Dragons. Mock the dragon riding FX all you want, the rest of the dragon fight in that scene was great.
It was nowhere near as bad as people are making it out to be, people just love to overreact.
The only thing that looked weird in that scene was Dany riding on top of it. The Dragon CG itself looked great as it usually does.
The only thing that looked weird in that scene was Dany riding on top of it. The Dragon CG itself looked great as it usually does.
It was nowhere near as bad as people are making it out to be, people just love to overreact.
Just finished watching season 5, I'm finally caught up...right on time. No more binge watching, though.
should we not talk about Jon Snow either?
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
No because we all know he's not.
TBH there is a bigger chance of Stannis still being alive than Jon
Why are we talking about Stannis?
He ded.
But his awesome swagger lives on...#Fewer
Maybe it's the ultimate red herring?Well if the episode is titled The Red Woman... might Jon be resurrected straight in this first episode? By the "Red Woman" Melisandre?