Yep, almost zero. 2K sports should also be ashamed and they have the nerve to charge $60 for their games, at least with EA you get an obvious graphic upgrade. Outside of nba2K6 you get none of that with 2K titles.Forgotten Ancient said:Wow...there really is not much difference between the 360 and Xbox pics of Tony Hawk.
Forgotten Ancient said:Wow...there really is not much difference between the 360 and Xbox pics of Tony Hawk.
dorio said:Yep, almost zero. 2K sports should also be ashamed and they have the nerve to charge $60 for their games, at least with EA you get an obvious graphic upgrade. Outside of nba2K6 you get none of that with 2K titles.
...um, there are only a couple of 2K titles...and you get the graphic upgrade on NHL if you subscribed to the HD ERA like Allard told you to months ago. Polishing a gameplay turd (hullo NBA Live) only gets you so far, I'm too savvy to be distracted by bright shiny objects. Good graphics + better gameplay = WINNARdorio said:Yep, almost zero. 2K sports should also be ashamed and they have the nerve to charge $60 for their games, at least with EA you get an obvious graphic upgrade. Outside of nba2K6 you get none of that with 2K titles.
Looking at most of the EA titles, I wouldn't have known that they were for the Xbox360 if I wasn't told. They look remarkablely comparable to the Xbox counterparts.
You need to see 2k6 on a tv to compare. The difference between the 2 is huge IMO.dorio said:Yep, almost zero. 2K sports should also be ashamed and they have the nerve to charge $60 for their games, at least with EA you get an obvious graphic upgrade. Outside of nba2K6 you get none of that with 2K titles.
I think thats the pointWhat a terrible way to execute a comparison.
You need to see an optometrist because there is a big difference. They maybe crappy games but there definitely is a big graphical difference.littlewig said:Looking at most of the EA titles, I wouldn't have known that they were for the Xbox360 if I wasn't told.
Indeed. Well done Gamespot!AlphaSnake said::lol What a terrible way to execute a comparison.
raYne said:Indeed. Well done Gamespot!
Hopefully next time they'll have some $5 disposable camera pics to compare with frame buffer grabs. Those will surely do the job.
olimario said:NFS
XBOX > XBOX 360
I think it would be, if they actually took good, comparable pictures. The King Kong, NFS, and most of the sports game comparisons (sans Madden) are utterly terrible, on top of the fact that all of the screens are of terrible image quality.jamesinclair said:I think its a great feature.
FiRez said:are you blind?
olimario said:The 360 version looks washed out. As odd as it sound I prefer the "style" of the XBOX version. Doesn't look technically inferior either.
Beowolf said:360wned!!!!
PG2G said:That'd be a yes then.
If you do that, you should have scale the xbox1 titles to equal screen height since the 360 games will be widescreen and originals might not. There are too many black bars on the lo-res photos.chespace said:Don't worry guys, we'll be posting a better comparison (screenshots and video) of "lazy port" Xbox 360 games feature sometime today. 12 games that are either on current gen systems or on PC.
way to put on the pressurechespace said:Don't worry guys, we'll be posting a better comparison (screenshots and video) of "lazy port" Xbox 360 games feature sometime today. 12 games that are either on current gen systems or on PC.
olimario said:What's so much better about the 360 version? A few more trees?
You know it's a port, right?
ImNotLikeThem said:Well can it at least be said that its telling that this comparison is even possible? Nobody would have compared ps1->ps2 like this during launch, because it would have been ridiculous. Just the fact that the current gen is even comparable to next gen as much as it is has to say something. The technology is just not going to be as noticeable anymore, I think we've established that by now, no sense beating it into the ground. It has nothing to do with the 360. Except the lazy devs who do shitwork.
Helznicht said:Tiger Woods is a HUGE difference. I cant count on one hand how many imressions on this board I have read that say it looks last gen. How can that be?
Helznicht said:Tiger Woods is a HUGE difference. I cant count on one hand how many imressions on this board I have read that say it looks last gen. How can that be?
Tiger Woods is a HUGE difference. I cant count on one hand how many imressions on this board I have read that say it looks last gen. How can that be?.
Speevy said:Many next-gen games won't appear that way until you play them.
ya, i noticed that also.sirris said:That NFS comp shot is a joke. The 360 blows away the Xbox one. Why would the take a clear shot vs. a take off shot in the rain with smoke everywhere? Stupid.