• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Gamespot xbox-xbox360 comparison

Forgotten Ancient said:
Wow...there really is not much difference between the 360 and Xbox pics of Tony Hawk.
Yep, almost zero. 2K sports should also be ashamed and they have the nerve to charge $60 for their games, at least with EA you get an obvious graphic upgrade. Outside of nba2K6 you get none of that with 2K titles.
 
dorio said:
Yep, almost zero. 2K sports should also be ashamed and they have the nerve to charge $60 for their games, at least with EA you get an obvious graphic upgrade. Outside of nba2K6 you get none of that with 2K titles.

Looking at most of the EA titles, I wouldn't have known that they were for the Xbox360 if I wasn't told. They look remarkablely comparable to the Xbox counterparts.

These sloppy ports should make they developers feel ashame.
 
dorio said:
Yep, almost zero. 2K sports should also be ashamed and they have the nerve to charge $60 for their games, at least with EA you get an obvious graphic upgrade. Outside of nba2K6 you get none of that with 2K titles.
...um, there are only a couple of 2K titles...and you get the graphic upgrade on NHL if you subscribed to the HD ERA like Allard told you to months ago. Polishing a gameplay turd (hullo NBA Live) only gets you so far, I'm too savvy to be distracted by bright shiny objects. Good graphics + better gameplay = WINNAR

xb02.gif


"Don't make me hit you again."
 
Looking at most of the EA titles, I wouldn't have known that they were for the Xbox360 if I wasn't told. They look remarkablely comparable to the Xbox counterparts.

The EA games actually show more of an upgrade than any of the other games in that feature.
 
dorio said:
Yep, almost zero. 2K sports should also be ashamed and they have the nerve to charge $60 for their games, at least with EA you get an obvious graphic upgrade. Outside of nba2K6 you get none of that with 2K titles.
You need to see 2k6 on a tv to compare. The difference between the 2 is huge IMO.

What a terrible way to execute a comparison.
I think thats the point :p
 
I love this comparions. It's the perfect way to do it.


Tony Hawk
XBOX = XBOX 360

GUN
XBOX = XBOX 360

NHL 2k6
XBOX = XBOX 360

NFS
XBOX > XBOX 360
 
littlewig said:
Looking at most of the EA titles, I wouldn't have known that they were for the Xbox360 if I wasn't told.
You need to see an optometrist because there is a big difference. They maybe crappy games but there definitely is a big graphical difference.
 
AlphaSnake said:
:lol What a terrible way to execute a comparison.
Indeed. Well done Gamespot!

Hopefully next time they'll have some $5 disposable camera pics to compare with frame buffer grabs. Those will surely do the job.
 
raYne said:
Indeed. Well done Gamespot!

Hopefully next time they'll have some $5 disposable camera pics to compare with frame buffer grabs. Those will surely do the job.

If only it were possible to take even remotely similar shots/angles/models from both games too! I guarantee the "PS3 Controller is COMFORTABLE" guy put 10x as much work into his little animation. Some equivalent MS fanboys need to get on the case.
 
I think its a great feature.

I think they also need to do some other comparisons....

1st gen games on both systems!


Madden 2002 vs Madden 2006
THPS2 vs THAW
Need for Speed MW vs NFS Hot Persuit 2
Kameo vs Kameo on GC
DOA3 vs DOA4
 
jamesinclair said:
I think its a great feature.
I think it would be, if they actually took good, comparable pictures. The King Kong, NFS, and most of the sports game comparisons (sans Madden) are utterly terrible, on top of the fact that all of the screens are of terrible image quality.
 
"xbox-xbox360 comparison"

What's the fucking point?

Honestly, some sites have too much time, too many ideas and too much money on their hands. I admit, I haven't even clicked. Is this any good?
 
That NFS comp shot is a joke. The 360 blows away the Xbox one. Why would the take a clear shot vs. a take off shot in the rain with smoke everywhere? Stupid.
 
I thought it was a decent side by side comparision and definetly reinforces my decision not to get an x360 till I get my HDTV first


late january can't get here soon enough! :D
 
olimario said:
The 360 version looks washed out. As odd as it sound I prefer the "style" of the XBOX version. Doesn't look technically inferior either.

That'd be a yes then.
 
I wish this had been done better so that the screens showed the same thing on each version - the Tony Hawk one is the only one you can really compare directly.

I haven't seen a 360 running in real life yet but based on this feature I wouldn't get one at launch price for my SDTV.
 
I find it odd that the 360 outputs such a poor 480i/480p picture.
It seems to downscale the player models and lose the fsaa, as opposed to just downscaling the 720p image.
 
Beowolf said:
360wned!!!!

I don't really think it's 360-owned insomuch as it's Activision- and 2k-sports- owned. EA games actually look like real next-generation products.
 
Well can it at least be said that its telling that this comparison is even possible? Nobody would have compared ps1->ps2 like this during launch, because it would have been ridiculous. Just the fact that the current gen is even comparable to next gen as much as it is has to say something. The technology is just not going to be as noticeable anymore, I think we've established that by now, no sense beating it into the ground. It has nothing to do with the 360. Except the lazy devs who do shitwork.
 
Don't worry guys, we'll be posting a better comparison (screenshots and video) of "lazy port" Xbox 360 games feature sometime today. 12 games that are either on current gen systems or on PC.
 
chespace said:
Don't worry guys, we'll be posting a better comparison (screenshots and video) of "lazy port" Xbox 360 games feature sometime today. 12 games that are either on current gen systems or on PC.
If you do that, you should have scale the xbox1 titles to equal screen height since the 360 games will be widescreen and originals might not. There are too many black bars on the lo-res photos.
 
Tiger Woods is a HUGE difference. I cant count on one hand how many imressions on this board I have read that say it looks last gen. How can that be?
 
chespace said:
Don't worry guys, we'll be posting a better comparison (screenshots and video) of "lazy port" Xbox 360 games feature sometime today. 12 games that are either on current gen systems or on PC.
way to put on the pressure :D
 
olimario said:
What's so much better about the 360 version? A few more trees?
You know it's a port, right?

The Xbox version looks like Road Rash on 3DO by comparison. The road and road side texturing is terrible, the trees are terrible, the car is a jaggy mess (and the rear window is tinted to 0% :P)...

The sports games (aside from Madden and Tiger Woods) are the only ones that look terrible in this comparison. Even crap games like GUN and Tony Hawk have a noticeable improvement over the Xbox versions, well... more noticeable than I had originally thought.
 
ImNotLikeThem said:
Well can it at least be said that its telling that this comparison is even possible? Nobody would have compared ps1->ps2 like this during launch, because it would have been ridiculous. Just the fact that the current gen is even comparable to next gen as much as it is has to say something. The technology is just not going to be as noticeable anymore, I think we've established that by now, no sense beating it into the ground. It has nothing to do with the 360. Except the lazy devs who do shitwork.

If the technology won't be as noticable then why doesn't anyone believe that we'll see Killzone 2 graphics this gen? A lot of people took notice of that demo.
 
Helznicht said:
Tiger Woods is a HUGE difference. I cant count on one hand how many imressions on this board I have read that say it looks last gen. How can that be?



Many next-gen games won't appear that way until you play them.


Does every game need an intense amount of effects or hundreds of characters on screen? Of course not. Does every character need tens of thousands of polygons? Well maybe, but that doesn't always represent well in screenshots. Great lighting is really the only thing that should find its way into all next-gen screenshots.
 
Helznicht said:
Tiger Woods is a HUGE difference. I cant count on one hand how many imressions on this board I have read that say it looks last gen. How can that be?

People say the same thing about Madden too.

Most people who say this are just trolling for the sake of trolling though and don't even own a 360.
 
alot of trollers without 360 and who won't have a HDTV even when they buy PS3 or Rev.

screenshots don't tell much about the graphics of 720p games.
 
Tiger Woods is a HUGE difference. I cant count on one hand how many imressions on this board I have read that say it looks last gen. How can that be?.


Its mainly because Links looks SO much better than current gen TW.

if they were comparing xbox Links with 360 TW it would b marginal.
 
Speevy said:
Many next-gen games won't appear that way until you play them.

Yeah, and not only that. You sometimes have to look for the details; because a lot of these 1st gen next gen titles are built on current gen games skeletons with a tons of tiny details added on top. Overall visual impact may not be too different from current gen, but if you look closer...

Speking of which, i'm having fun moving the camera along the streets of London in PGR3 and zooming in on buildings and shops signs...it's crazy.
I don't think i am exaggerating when i say Bizarre could have cut the polycount and texture detail by 80% and no one would have ever noticed while racing.
Modeled windows, crazy textures, statues with parallax mapping on reliefs, normalmapped shop signs, the freaking MCLaren symbol normalmapped on F1 wheels !
This is just insane; just try it if you wonder how a nextgen shenmue would look like.


Oh, and i am absolutely LOVING that motion blur effect when you turn around in PDZ and when you walk around in the garage in PGR3. It makes everything instantly look very CG ish; albeit sublte it really is something that immediately sets next gen visuals apart.
Halo 3 better have it.
 
sirris said:
That NFS comp shot is a joke. The 360 blows away the Xbox one. Why would the take a clear shot vs. a take off shot in the rain with smoke everywhere? Stupid.
ya, i noticed that also.

one thing to keep in mind also is that these comparison shots cannot show other graphical differences like smoother and higher framerates not to mention animations.
 
Top Bottom