Knuckle Sandwich
Member
Meh. Can't think of a site of theirs that isn't trash. If they have any good writers I'm sure they'll land on their feet somewhere.
They didn't 'run it out of business' they won a lawsuit
They didn't 'run it out of business' they won a lawsuit
Was anything illegal done?It blows my mind that anyone could think that a rich asshole being able to put a media company out of business for posting articles he didn't like is good or acceptable. And yet people are celebrating this.
I hope Gawker prevails and that Theil and Hogan eat shit, not because I approve of all Gawker's publishing decisions, but because what those two are doing is fucked up.
Keep in mind that chapter 11 is used to restructure debt, rather than liquidate. So Gawker isn't going anywhere just yet.
As much as Gawker sucks as an entity (although it certainly has some worthwhile parts), it sucks that a racist piece of shit gets to come out ahead in life.
I find it hard to celebrate this. Gawker has disgusted me on more than one occasion, but for a millionaire and a billionaire to be able to team up and use the legal system to (edit: potentially) run it out of business? Surely there are negative implications there. Particularly when said billionaire happens to be someone with very little respect for the media, democracy, etc. in the first place.
Not to mention Gawker hasn't been entirely bad. There are a lot of great people working under that banner.
You'd rather have private citizens outed than lose your articles?
I find it hard to celebrate this. Gawker has disgusted me on more than one occasion, but for a millionaire and a billionaire to be able to team up and use the legal system to (edit: potentially) run it out of business? Surely there are negative implications there. Particularly when said billionaire happens to be someone with very little respect for the media, democracy, etc. in the first place.
Not to mention Gawker hasn't been entirely bad. There are a lot of great people working under that banner.
They didn't 'run it out of business' they won a lawsuit
I mean, the whole point of that lawsuit was to get a judgement that would drive Gawker out of business
Hogan never expected to actually get paid that
It blows my mind that anyone could think that a rich asshole being able to put a media company out of business for posting articles he didn't like is good or acceptable.
That's the problem.
Gawker writes awful shit so they really need to learn a different style of journalism somewhere elseFeel sorry for the people who work there...
That's the problem.
They would have never been put position to be put out of business if they hadn't illegally posted a video of Hulk Hogan having sex without his permission and then refused to take it down when he asked.
I find it hard to celebrate this. Gawker has disgusted me on more than one occasion, but for a millionaire and a billionaire to be able to team up and use the legal system to (edit: potentially) run it out of business? Surely there are negative implications there. Particularly when said billionaire happens to be someone with very little respect for the media, democracy, etc. in the first place.
Not to mention Gawker hasn't been entirely bad. There are a lot of great people working under that banner.
From my finances illiterate perspective, it sounds like Gawker will eventually rise from the ashes of its current bankruptcy?
Reputable publications aren't being taken out left and right by irate billionaires, so this isn't really a slippery slope argument.
Except that's not the matter to which the lawsuit pertained.
It's still really scary that they can be.
From my finances illiterate perspective, it sounds like Gawker will eventually rise from the ashes of its current bankruptcy?
Just give me Kotaku and Deadspin and kill the rest. Even fleshbot
Well if they all start behaving like Gawker, they deserve to be.
Wouldn't Gawker be fine if they had just taken down the video after they were asked to? People might not like millionaires teaming up on an outlet but Gawker still brought this on themselves.I find it hard to celebrate this. Gawker has disgusted me on more than one occasion, but for a millionaire and a billionaire to be able to team up and use the legal system to (edit: potentially) run it out of business? Surely there are negative implications there. Particularly when said billionaire happens to be someone with very little respect for the media, democracy, etc. in the first place.
Not to mention Gawker hasn't been entirely bad. There are a lot of great people working under that banner.
Sure if they go completely crazy and start outing closeted gay people and posting sex tapes in which the celebrity participants are unknowingly filmed.It's still really scary that they can be.
I find it hard to celebrate this. Gawker has disgusted me on more than one occasion, but for a millionaire and a billionaire to be able to team up and use the legal system to (edit: potentially) run it out of business? Surely there are negative implications there. Particularly when said billionaire happens to be someone with very little respect for the media, democracy, etc. in the first place.
Not to mention Gawker hasn't been entirely bad. There are a lot of great people working under that banner.
Not gonna miss garbage sites like Jezebel.
Except that's not the matter to which the lawsuit pertained.
Hulk Hogan's not a millionaire, Hulk Hogan's broke.
Because if you aren't publishing sex tapes and hacked materials, you probably wouldn't lose a lawsuit like this?
Reputable publications aren't being taken out left and right by irate billionaires, so this isn't really a slippery slope argument.
Pretty sure the trial that led to gawkers downfall was about the sextape. Also, even if Peter Thiel is a bad person, his gripe with gawker for outing him seems justified.I honestly don't think many people in here know who Peter Thiel is and what he stands for. This isn't about a stupid sex tape.
Well if they all start behaving like Gawker, they deserve to be.
Nobody is choosing whom to sue but the billionaires that can afford it. I don't want to trust them to only sue "bad" outlets and not those that reveal ethics violations, bad labor practices, corruption, etc.Sure if they go completely crazy and start outing closeted gay people and posting sex tapes in which the celebrity participants are unknowingly filmed.
The point is that no reputable organization would do that.
Was anything illegal done?
People aren't trusting the billionaires, they trust the justice system. Gawker legitimately did some bad stuff.Nobody is choosing whom to sue but the billionaires that can afford it. I don't want to trust them to only sue "bad" outlets and not those that reveal ethics violations, bad labor practices, corruption, etc.
Nobody is choosing whom to sue but the billionaires that can afford it. I don't want to trust them to only sue "bad" outlets and not those that reveal ethics violations, bad labor practices, corruption, etc.