DigitalDream
Banned
If you're going to add honor student to the title you might as well make her a triple threat and add that she is black.
If that were the case we'd just loop around to the fact that said rule is discriminatory bullshit that has no place in modern society, regardless of your hard-on for rules.First of all it says "as far as she knows", second it could very well be that the school established the rule in a more explicit way because it had to be spelled out for that one student while all others saw it as a matter of course.
If you're going to add honor student to the title you might as well make her a triple threat and add that she is black.
Anyways, if there is an actual written rule then she should shut the fuck up.
Well the justification has already been laid out by plenty of others. Continuation of a tradition, projecting an image, homogeneity etc. Now you can disagree that these are valid arguments (they are valid enough for me) but that doesn't change my original argument though, does it? I will ask again: what makes her so special that the rule has to be changed for her? Why shouldn't she have to follow the rules? Can we always pick and chose? Nothing convincing has been forthcoming other than "it's 2015!" and gender this and gender that which I don't have an issue with frankly.
Except there is a difference between "tradition" and "rules"
Just a quick wikipedia quote for you there.
You seem under the assumption that the tradition is a rule and that by going against tradition she is breaking said rules, and you are wrong.
She isn't trying to break any rules, she's challenging an outdated way of thinking (a tradition)
Now you're going too far.
It is absolutely sufficient criticism. Can you explain why it is not?
What is so ridiculous about what I said? It's a perfect example of how irrelevant being an honor student is to this whole thread.
We keep talking past each other. You keep asking why the tradition can't be changed. I don't know why it couldn't be changed, it can absolutely be changed. I'm not saying that the dress code is something better or correct simply because it is older, traditional, or always has been done.
I'm simply saying that we can't pick and chose the rules we have to follow nor can this student. Nothings make her so special that she doesn't have to follow the established rule and make up her own. I have to turn up at work dressed up although no customer ever sees me. I could sit there in T-shirt and jeans. This rules makes absolutely no sense but I don't have a choice, I have to follow it. The dress code doesn't have any justification either other than tradition but that doesn't strike me as reason enough not to follow the rule and make up their own.
What is so ridiculous about what I said? It's a perfect example of how irrelevant being an honor student is to this whole thread.
As laid out ad nauseam, she is still complying to the formal dress code by wearing a tux.While I understand why she might want to wear a tux, there's a dress code.
Dress codes can make someone not enter a restaurant, or attend a certain party. That's what right of admission is for.
Rather than sexist or homophobic dress codes are more of a classist thing. What is there to stop one male from saying he doesn't want a tux because he feels uncomfortable with it(as far as I know, this is a gay person, not a transgender person being denied their new gender... so I don't quite see why she gets to choose the dress code).
While I understand why she might want to wear a tux, there's a dress code.
Dress codes can make someone not enter a restaurant, or attend a certain party. That's what right of admission is for.
Rather than sexist or homophobic dress codes are more of a classist thing. What is there to stop one male from saying he doesn't want a tux because he feels uncomfortable with it(as far as I know, this is a gay person, not a transgender person being denied their new gender... so I don't quite see why she gets to choose the dress code).
It's a Fucking prom for goodness sakes. How are people really defending this with tradition nonsense arguments. Not one person has given one good reason as to who it would hurt if she didn't wear a dress.
She's not choosing the dress code. The tuxedo is one of two code options.
The school is choosing to enforce a potentially nonexistent "rule" that goes beyond formal wear for a formal event-- this is a matter of little girls wear dresses and little boys wear pants. I'm frankly surprised they're not also making the girls wear pink and the boys wear blue.
You know her personally?Why would she want to wear a tuxedo anyway? You can't work that look, sorry. Shit will just look ridiculous
Why do people use this phrase in situations where 'we' clearly haven't?We moved beyond this crap.
Hurt? probably no one. But if you're rewarding a honor student with choice over the rules, that's classism. Everyone else has to abide the rules, or can they too decide to wear whatever they want? Just a curious question.
I'm all for questioning impositions but where do you draw the line of what can be done and what can't be done? What if a male doesn't want to wear a tuxedo but a more casual shirt and jeans, if they totally feel uncomfortable with a tuxedo?
Hurt? probably no one. But if you're rewarding a honor student with choice over the rules, that's classism. Everyone else has to abide the rules, or can they too decide to wear whatever they want? Just a curious question.
I'm all for questioning impositions but where do you draw the line of what can be done and what can't be done? What if a male doesn't want to wear a tuxedo but a more casual shirt and jeans, if they totally feel uncomfortable with a tuxedo?
Why do people use this phrase in situations where 'we' clearly haven't?
Hurt? probably no one. But if you're rewarding a honor student with choice over the rules, that's classism. Everyone else has to abide the rules, or can they too decide to wear whatever they want? Just a curious question.
I'm all for questioning impositions but where do you draw the line of what can be done and what can't be done? What if a male doesn't want to wear a tuxedo but a more casual shirt and jeans, if they totally feel uncomfortable with a tuxedo?
There isn't anything ridiculous about your statement. In fact, I agree with you. The article is poorly written armed with a title purely to grab as much page views as possible.
But there's no two code, there's one code per gender. If they denied a transgender person this right it would be something to make a fuss about because they'd be denying their identity.
Because "it's 2015"
Just like how it was "2014", "2013", "2006", "2000", "1993", "1985" etc etc
Why do people have a problem with statements like that? Why does it bother you so much?
We should be past this kind of thing as a society, and if you don't encounter many injustices like this in your daily life and see a story like this it just doesn't make sense. I don't see how that's hard to understand.
Dress code is absolutely bullshit.While I understand why she might want to wear a tux, there's a dress code.
Dress codes can make someone not enter a restaurant, or attend a certain party. That's what right of admission is for.
Rather than sexist or homophobic dress codes are more of a classist thing. What is there to stop one male from saying he doesn't want a tux because he feels uncomfortable with it(as far as I know, this is a gay person, not a transgender person being denied their new gender... so I don't quite see why she gets to choose the dress code).
it's obvious that the article said she was an honor student, because, media and the audience typically don't care about minorities unless they are perfect angels, even then some still don't care. If the title of this topic bothers you then ask a mod to change it.
This is exactly it. A tux is certainly okay at the prom, but just not for a girl.The "it's the dress code" people miss the point.
The current dress-code is hetero-normative nonsense. It'd be completely intact if they made the minor amendment saying students can come wearing "either a tux or a dress". If a boy gets to wear a suit, why should a girl not get to? That makes no sense. It's not like she's trying to get special privileges and walk in with an AC/DC t-shirt and acidwash jeans.
She should boycott the prom.
Love hadn't intended to take a date to the prom but wanted to attend with a group of friends who have also now chosen not to attend because of the no-tux rule. She says a petition by members of the senior class to change the rule wasn't acted on by faculty.
The "it's the dress code" people miss the point.
The current dress-code is hetero-normative nonsense. It'd be completely intact if they made the minor amendment saying students can come wearing "either a tux or a dress". If a boy gets to wear a suit, why should a girl not get to? That makes no sense. It's not like she's trying to get special privileges and walk in with an AC/DC t-shirt and acidwash jeans.
It was an encouragement, it's the only logical thing to do in this situation.It's in the OP.
No, the point of a dress code is to ensure a certain standard of attire across the board, not gender stereotype. See: every red carpet.Right... That's the point of a dress code.
Out of sight, out of mind then?Why do people have a problem with statements like that? Why does it bother you so much?
We should be past this kind of thing as a society, and if you don't encounter many injustices like this in your daily life and see a story like this it just doesn't make sense. I don't see how that's hard to understand.
It's the equivalent of plugging your ears and going "lalalalala". The year it is has no bearing on anything, and saying "we should" is a lot different than "we are"
That's not my argument though, my argument is that we don't always get to do things our way, that's not how society works. Sometimes there are rules that we have to follow and the rule here is a dresscode that mandates a dress for women and tux for men based on traditions. What makes her so special that she doesn't have to follow this rule? Can we just pick and chose which rules we want to follow?
The question here is not whether the tradition is worth protecting, the question is why the tradition should change due to the discomfort of a single person. Put those two things on a scale and tradition weighs more heavy for me. Do you have any other argument besides her happiness, because that's not very convincing either.
Right... That's the point of a dress code.
No, the point of a dress code is to ensure a certain standard of attire across the board, not gender stereotype. See: every red carpet.
Thats not it at all. The phrase is meant to highlight the progress we have made. There have been more than one transgender prom queen king/queen. Gays go to proms with their SO. Women wear suits without losing anything. Cases like these are clearly the exception.