By the way,
here's a great video about the difference between freedom of speech and "freedom of speech".
A lot of Americans seem to think that ANYTHING that somehow prevents them from saying something is an infringement on free speech.
That "freedom of speech" means "freedom of any consequence", instead of meaning that they can express themselves without the government interfering. In particular this is in regards to protection of your right to express disagreement with the government, its policies, personnel within it, etc. - that's what the intention behind it is.
There always have been exceptions to the right to free speech. For instance, inciting to violence or other crimes generally is illegal. So are libel/slander. Stuff like that.
Now, a lot of "freedom of speech activists" seem to think that any sort of repercussion from people or organizations that do not represent the government is censorship and curtailing their freedom of speech. For instance universities creating safe spaces for minorities, or Twitter banning Milo Yiannopoulos, or Facebook removing anti-semitic posts, even down to people simply blocking others on Twitter, people getting fired from their workplace for expressing bigotry on social media, or whatnot. And of course, this also includes criticism of
their opinions and statements.
Essentially, they seem to think that "freedom of speech" means "freedom to be an asshole to anyone without any repercussions" social or otherwise.