Giant Bombcast 03-22-2011

Majine

Banned
1741671-mike_rowe_dirty_jobs_1640717_415_312_thumb.jpg


Giant Bomb said:
The World Champions of Podcasting are back at it again! Get your fill of Dragon Age II, premium Japanese thermoses, Philip K. Dick's insatiable appetite for amphetamines, Crysis 2, our first week with the Nintendo 3DS, and much more!

RSS / MP3 / ITUNES

Length 1:48:32 / Size 49.8 MB
 
Bombcast is a dirty job but somebody's gotta do it.

I can't wait until they talk about what Mike Rowe was doing at their party.
 
HamPster PamPster said:
Some people may love Mondays but Tuesdays is where the real love is
Thanks to the wonders of time difference, there is no competition. Enjoying NDX and GBC on tuesdays.
 
Brewster's Wallet said:
http://static3.shopify.com/s/files/1/0021/8972/files/four.jpg[img]

:-)[/QUOTE]

I watched their Deadly Premonition endurance run having no idea what Vinny looked like.



That is not how I imagined him.
 
Nappuccino said:
I watched their Deadly Premonition endurance run having no idea what Vinny looked like.



That is not how I imagined him.
1091034-1087579_img_0928_super_super.jpg

It appears this has turned into a Vinny love-in. Excellent.
 
Haven't been paying attention to 3DS stuff so maybe this is already well known, but am disappointed to hear about backwards compatibility issues Brad had. Never been a big into handheld gaming, but have been traveling more and thought about getting something.

Since the DS seems to have good SRPGs and JRPGs, though I'd grab the 3DS to have good hardware to play the whole catalog. Might be better just to get a used DSi and sitting tight with that for a while.
 
Qwomo said:

Great :)

EDIT: I listen to the bombast religiously but I really detest Jeff's attitude towards PC gaming sometimes. He was a complete apologist for MW2 during that whole debacle and now he's saying that people who want quicksaves on PC are living in the past and need to move on?

It's particularly grating when Brad starts to speak up mentioning that though he doesn't personally care it's an expectation on the platform but Jeff just stonewalls him.

Obviously a "state of PC gaming" discussion doesn't gel with the Bomcast's style and they're console focussed which is cool, but at least be cognisant that it's something a lot of PC gamers are passionate about.

Still love you guys ')
 
DaBuddaDa said:
They couldn't sound more apathetic towards Crysis 2 if they tried.
They sounded pretty positive on it to me. I half expected them to hate it, especially since Jeff said he wasn't a huge fan of the first.
 
That thermos bit was hilarious and informative.

Really enjoying it so far (stopped listening, now in a lecture), definitely sounds like they're enjoying themselves again

Ryan helming it helps I think
 
For the last two podcasts it feels like they don't want to be there. I can understand why. Well, except Vinny. He has this positive aura.
 
Riposte said:
For the last two podcasts it feels like they don't want to be there. I can understand why. Well, except Vinny. He has this positive aura.
And it never feels like Brad wants to be there. He spends every Bombcast sighing and groaning and wanting to leave.
 
Bombcast-related:

Did they write up their Best of 2010 for the site? It's gotta be in there somewhere, but I can't find it (and I really looked).

I'd rather not listen to four hours of deliberations AGAIN just to remind myself where they ended up.
 
Riposte said:
For the last two podcasts it feels like they don't want to be there. I can understand why. Well, except Vinny. He has this positive aura.
I thought everyone sounded pretty enthusiastic. Except for Brad, of course, but it would be pretty strange if he were. I also can't think of a single time I've heard Vinny not be positive.
 
AShep said:
Great :)

EDIT: I listen to the bombast religiously but I really detest Jeff's attitude towards PC gaming sometimes. He was a complete apologist for MW2 during that whole debacle and now he's saying that people who want quicksaves on PC are living in the past and need to move on?

It's particularly grating when Brad starts to speak up mentioning that though he doesn't personally care it's an expectation on the platform but Jeff just stonewalls him.

Obviously a "state of PC gaming" discussion doesn't gel with the Bomcast's style and they're console focussed which is cool, but at least be cognisant that it's something a lot of PC gamers are passionate about.

Still love you guys ')
How is going from quick saves to checkpoints moving forward? I don't particularly care or get angry about how Jeff feels about PC games, but I always found the "gotta move forward" argument kinda lame. Especially since its usually used when talking about taking control away from the players.
 
What's wrong with quick saving? I don't get how that is in the past. It's useful. It's like how Jeff said server lists are in the past and matchmaking is perfectly fine now. As a person not from America I find matchmaking the bane of my online play.
 
I want to sit down with them all and show them how to embrace Crysis' open nature. It actually directs where you have to go exactly (big green maker on the map) but there are lots of areas you can choose to go to or not on your way.

They really underestimate how fucking amazing Crysis is. I hate the claim that Crytek games are just tech demos.
 
Jeff responded to people asking about his stance and quick saves and repeated what he said on the Bombcast: JUST CHECKPOINT BETTER.

That's a problem better solved by tighter, smarter checkpointing and dialogue variation. Letting people hammer quick save all the way through a game is fine, but is that what you want to constantly worry about while you play? Or would you rather focus on the actual game?

Which seems like a vast oversimplification, since his Crysis 2 example in particular was because he was stealthing. If he had played that section by shooting, it might have been over far more quickly and the checkpoint at the end more sensibly placed. When playing it stealth-style, then it's totally different.

Jeff is basically asking for some super-intelligent new form of auto-saving that detects how you're trying to play a game and what your intent is and saves accordingly without accidentally saving when you're just fucking around. In a more linear FPS that'd be a lot easier than in something like Crysis, which encourages a lot of variation.



And yeah, count me in with Brad. I think their "Crytek games are just tech demos first" attitude is really selling those games short. Crysis 1 was a fantastic experience that didn't "lack focus" at all.
 
Top Bottom