On the subject of YA fiction, while it is not made specifically for girls, it does feature a female protagonist and an author who is consciously feminist:
The book is quite wonderful, but it did get some criticisms that it was too tough for children and I loved
her response on this issue.
I have to say that Austen novels are substantially better. Austen pairs societal criticisms and human insights in her stories. Both the hero and the heroine are flawed characters (except maybe Fanny Price who is her most passive and static heroine) whose romance helps them grow into better people. The women in the novels who marry unwisely, think Lydia in Pride and Prejudice, are not praised for having "captured" a husband unless it is by an already established foolish character. Jane Austen always stresses the importance of marrying for love and that the character of your marriage partner should be known ahead of time. (Anne Elliot/Captain Wentworth vs Anne Elliot/William Elliot). Jane Austen does not endorse abusive relationships even if it means becoming a spinster, in a time when becoming a spinster meant dying in the streets alone.
... Which reminds me, I need to read the copy of
Pride and Prejudice I picked up from the library. I had a friend strongly recommend it as her favorite book. Personally, I feel like I can usually get into a novel even if it isn't
The Brontes on the other hand... I hate them.
I had a love / hate relationship with Jane Eyre (only Bronte novel I have read). There were parts that I just loved (particularly her as a child), but so much of it just drove me nuts, especially the romance aspect and the nature of their relationship.
Oh, and physiognomy reveals all.