Yeah, I thought the same. That happened so quickly too .That isn't actually the end of Donald Glover on the show is it? I thought he was in for the season for some reason.
I've lived that interview way too many times.
Also, this is the first episode not written by Lena.
That isn't actually the end of Donald Glover on the show is it? I thought he was in for the season for some reason.
Really?
Because I found this to be my favorite.
Guess she's not that good a writer
I've lived that interview way too many times.
Also, this is the first episode not written by Lena.
I'm pretty sure this is it.
Disappointing if so, I'd have liked to have seen more of him.
Go on...I've lived that interview way too many times.
lol the hotmail line was the best. I'm like that too. Any time I see someone who still uses hotmail I just sigh.
you did the right thing.Ex GF had an @aim.com account.
yeah the show needs more of them"Um yeah, she's not good at living."
Very funny episode today. And Marnie and Elijah have great chemistry together.
Her delivery of that line was amazing."Um yeah, she's not good at living."
I'm pretty sure this is it.
He wasn't really a character, more of a plot point/catalyst.I am pretty bummed that's it for Donald Glover's character. We didn't really know much about him, and now he's gone.
I am pretty bummed that's it for Donald Glover's character. We didn't really know much about him, and now he's gone.
He's a republican, is there anything worth of note?
He wasn't really a character, more of a plot point/catalyst.
Which makes his speech to Hannah and the end even more apt.
They kept saying that, but he never really shared his beliefs or did anything that conflicted with the others outright. It was just 'he's a republican, we can't hang out with him'. He didn't seem republican at all, he was just like them.
True, true - I just expected more though.
We got a sense of his beliefs. Hannah accused him of certain positions, ones it seemed they had discussed before, on gay marriage and gun control, and he didn't refute any of what Hannah said. Which makes Elijah being a complete asshole to Sandy in the bathroom that much more appropriate. Good for you, Elijah.
This is completely ludicrous. The point of the segments with Glover was to illustrate the willful ignorance/vapidity of Hannah and her cabal. They have such a nebulous conception of the nuance of politics and current affairs (further enforced by Jessa's encounter with Hannah earlier in the episode and her instructing Hannah to read a newspaper) that Elijah's and Hannah's faux outrage is more damning of their respective characters than of Sandy.We got a sense of his beliefs. Hannah accused him of certain positions, ones it seemed they had discussed before, on gay marriage and gun control, and he didn't refute any of what Hannah said. Which makes Elijah being a complete asshole to Sandy in the bathroom that much more appropriate. Good for you, Elijah.
Also I loved the part where Hannah is watching a how to youtube video. I do that all the time.
- A few of the shots in this episode were off. Hannah didn't have a puppy in her shirt when the camera focused on Jessa. (How great was it that she stuffed the dog down her shirt?) Sandy's body language was off too, in their scene.
They kept saying that, but he never really shared his beliefs or did anything that conflicted with the others outright. It was just 'he's a republican, we can't hang out with him'. He didn't seem republican at all, he was just like them.
This is completely ludicrous. The point of the segments with Glover was to illustrate the willful ignorance/vapidity of Hannah and her cabal. They have such a nebulous conception of the nuance of politics and current affairs (further enforced by Jessa's encounter with Hannah earlier in the episode and her instructing Hannah to read a newspaper) that Elijah's and Hannah's faux outrage is more damning of their respective characters than of Sandy.
This is completely ludicrous. The point of the segments with Glover was to illustrate the willful ignorance/vapidity of Hannah and her cabal. They have such a nebulous conception of the nuance of politics and current affairs (further enforced by Jessa's encounter with Hannah earlier in the episode and her instructing Hannah to read a newspaper) that Elijah's and Hannah's faux outrage is more damning of their respective characters than of Sandy.
I'm a liberal as well, but I don't start kerfuffles with anyone I perceive to be a Republican without further substantiation of their views or civil discourse preceding it. In fact, it's wholly inappropriate to pillory every Republican for opposing view points and eradicating any semblance of ideological substantiation. Elijah was immature and out of line, and I'm sure that Dunham was intending upon him coming across that way (the infantilization of the characters on this show is practically the thematic crux of the series so far). Advocating for that sort of behavior? Ridiculous.
This is completely ludicrous. The point of the segments with Glover was to illustrate the willful ignorance/vapidity of Hannah and her cabal. They have such a nebulous conception of the nuance of politics and current affairs (further enforced by Jessa's encounter with Hannah earlier in the episode and her instructing Hannah to read a newspaper) that Elijah's and Hannah's faux outrage is more damning of their respective characters than of Sandy.
I'm a liberal as well, but I don't start kerfuffles with anyone I perceive to be a Republican without further substantiation of their views or civil discourse preceding it. In fact, it's wholly inappropriate to pillory every Republican for opposing view points and eradicating any semblance of ideological substantiation. Elijah was immature and out of line, and I'm sure that Dunham was intending upon him coming across that way (the infantilization of the characters on this show is practically the thematic crux of the series so far). Advocating for that sort of behavior? Ridiculous.
This was kind of stupid. Who gets arrested for unpaid parking tickets.
This is completely ludicrous. The point of the segments with Glover was to illustrate the willful ignorance/vapidity of Hannah and her cabal. They have such a nebulous conception of the nuance of politics and current affairs (further enforced by Jessa's encounter with Hannah earlier in the episode and her instructing Hannah to read a newspaper) that Elijah's and Hannah's faux outrage is more damning of their respective characters than of Sandy.
I'm a liberal as well, but I don't start kerfuffles with anyone I perceive to be a Republican without further substantiation of their views or civil discourse preceding it. In fact, it's wholly inappropriate to pillory every Republican for opposing view points and eradicating any semblance of ideological substantiation. Elijah was immature and out of line, and I'm sure that Dunham was intending upon him coming across that way (the infantilization of the characters on this show is practically the thematic crux of the series so far). Advocating for that sort of behavior? Ridiculous.
No, that's bullshit. It's clear from the show that Sandy and Hannah have had this talk before concerning gay marriage. Hannah mentions it as such when they finally blow up at each other later. I'm not defending Hannah, but in the case of Elijah, good for him. He's not acting immature and out of line -- if Sandy has expressed to Hannah that he doesn't believe in gay marriage (which it sounds like he has), Elijah has every damn right to make Sandy as uncomfortable as possible. Because Sandy holds a position that's cancerous to Elijah's very life.
Does that excuse Hannah from getting mad at Sandy solely because he didn't like her writing? No. That was as narcissistic as it gets, especially because Hannah attempted to graph other issues over the real problem. But it doesn't change the fact that he holds those positions and one of them is particularly scarring to Elijah.
In that particular scene, Elijah did nothing wrong. Good on him. Sandy deserved it.
Nailed it.
It didn't seem like Hannah had a very substantive idea of Sandy's political views - or politics in general. In subtext, just how likely would it be for a young Republican living in the area of NYC that he does, dating the girl that he does, to be anti-gay marriage? I think this was the point: Neither Hanna or any of her friends were willing to engage with someone who existed outside their narrow world-view. Instead, he becomes every vague configuration of Republican they know and understand.
so do you hate sandy because he is a republican or because he just said he was
#neogaf
so do you hate sandy because he is a republican or because he just said he was
#neogaf
no, because there was no dialogue for it. here is what happened in last night's episode:And no one in this thread has said that.
naw that's possible. a buddy of mine forgot to pay an outstanding ticket for riding a train without a ticket and got a letter saying they had issued a warrant on him. nobody's going to come looking for you, but if you get pulled over or whatever they that'll come back up.
it's not like he goes to prison here, they just make him appear in front of a judge and pay it probably.