The thing that doesn't make sense to me is how people are either critical of GOW Ragnarok's visuals saying "That's not true next gen", but seem to completely forget about that when it comes to Elden Ring.
Amen.The thing that doesn't make sense to me is how people are either critical of GOW Ragnarok's visuals saying "That's not true next gen", but seem to completely forget about that when it comes to Elden Ring.
Elden Ring doesnt get enough hate imo. I think finally experiencing a true open world in a souls game made it feel fresh and gamers and critics alike simply forgot that it doesnt do anything new aside from taking place in a bigger world. And im not talking about the visuals which look worse than Bloodborne and even Dark Souls 3.Different set of expectations for each game. Elden Ring is a cross platform game. Ragnarok is the sequel to a console exclusive. Elden Ring was never going to be able to push graphical fidelity boundaries, but Ragnarok could, and should have.
I don't think the two games should be compared at all, but people insist on pitting them against one another for GOTY, so there you have it.
Only a person who never experienced sex in real life will say thatThat Dualsense quote lol. What haha
I can't wait for the psvr 2 dual sense quotes lol. Sex will have some competition I guess.Only a person who never experienced sex in real life will say that
Amen.
GOW being cross gen is disappointing as fuck... But you better keep that same energy when it comes to Elden Ring.
I don't want to hear a peep out of you about this
And then completely ignore, or better yet, praise this
It's because Ragnarok is a cinematic game and Elden Ring couldn't be further from that when it comes to third person action games, it needs to have cutting edge graphics if it wants to win the big awards this year.Yeah gotta love how Ragnarok while looking this ridiculously good is being "held back" by crossgen and it's "the same" as the previous one. I don't remember any of this on any Elden Ring topic...the big GOTY contender that had plenty of performance issues in every platform from any gen.
Must be something only a PS exclusive goes through i guess.
ER don't have that because From is incompetent in that department. They could achieve more if they really wanted to. And (GoW) Ragnarok gameplay is tighter than ER's. ER is better in other aspects though.It's because Ragnarok is a cinematic game and Elden Ring couldn't be further from that, it needs to have cutting edge graphics to compete with something like Elden Ring for the big awards
Im just going into it expecting more of the same, but with improved visuals, improved combat, more epic bosses, and an even better story. Not going into it expecting an earth shattering, medium-enhancing moment like TLOU 2. And if I get anything more than that, its candy. Im expecting a 9/10 whereas with ND games I go in expecting 11/10Elden Ring doesnt get enough hate imo. I think finally experiencing a true open world in a souls game made it feel fresh and gamers and critics alike simply forgot that it doesnt do anything new aside from taking place in a bigger world. And im not talking about the visuals which look worse than Bloodborne and even Dark Souls 3.
The problem GOW will have isnt the first 5 hours, those will feel fresh after a 4 and a half year gap. The problem will be to keep things fresh after you realize you're technically in the 45th hour of the game with the same set of combat moves, enemies and level design. I think HFW suffered from this because it simply didnt bring many new additions and settled for more of the same.
GOW can have more setpieces and enemy variety but it will need that new hook to keep it from feeling samey half way through the 40 hour campaign. So far, i didnt read anything from the previews that talks about that x-factor the sequel is bringing.
No excuse, Elden Ring just looks bad. Having an open world is no longer an excuse for shit looking graphics, it used to be in like 2010. But since GTA 5 we've had amazing looking open world games. From just doesn't give a shit about visuals/tech. They should be getting more hate. I cant ignore how bad ER looks.The difference is one vista is solely to look at from that one angle and the other vista (a relatively small part of a much larger area) is one that you can actually jump down and explore, while fighting enemies.
It is definitely From's biggest weakness but it doesn't matter much given the type of game that it is, a great and diverse art direction helps too.ER don't have that because From is incompetent in that department. They could achieve more if they really wanted to. And (GoW) Ragnarok gameplay is tighter than ER's. ER is better in other aspects though.
Can you not buy it on the store, digitally?Have they said anything about enemy variety? It was one of the weakest parts of the first ones IMO.
Regretfully despite pre-ordering since July I won't get my copy on release they but a week later. I wanna be mad at Amazon but at the same time I don't want to pay 10 USD more and buy somewhere else.
Both look different and amazing to me at the same time.Amen.
GOW being cross gen is disappointing as fuck... But you better keep that same energy when it comes to Elden Ring.
I don't want to hear a peep out of you about this
And then completely ignore, or better yet, praise this
Actually, The Tarnished feels like completely shit and sluggish to me, the input delay is ridiculous. Kratos is fast, tight and responsive.It is definitely From's biggest weakness but it doesn't matter much given the type of game that it is, a great and diverse art direction helps too.
Gameplay is tighter? Are we talking about controls because Kratos feels like shit to maneuver when you compare him to The Tarnished.
I will take smaller handily crafted map over the large, dull and barren openworld filled with trash ubisoft-tier filler content any day of the week, thank you.The difference is one vista is solely to look at from that one angle and the other vista (a relatively small part of a much larger area) is one that you can actually jump down and explore, while fighting enemies.
More forced walking and going through cracks?
Lol fuck this shit. I absolutely hated that in the original game. In fact, that is a bigger crime than the fact the graphics look the same. To make this game on the PS4 is the worst decision ever.
Great to see you mention GTAV because that was the first PS3 era open world game that went toe to toe with the linear games ND, SSM and GG were creating. Great lighting, draw distance, character models, and level of detail. Everyone caught up thanks to 8GB of vram in the last gen consoles, but I look back and what GTAV did on PS360 was amazing.Im just going into it expecting more of the same, but with improved visuals, improved combat, more epic bosses, and an even better story. Not going into it expecting an earth shattering, medium-enhancing moment like TLOU 2. And if I get anything more than that, its candy. Im expecting a 9/10 whereas with ND games I go in expecting 11/10
No excuse, Elden Ring just looks bad. Having an open world is no longer an excuse for shit looking graphics, it used to be in like 2010. But since GTA 5 we've had amazing looking open world games. From just doesn't give a shit about visuals/tech. They should be getting more hate. I cant ignore how bad ER looks.
What sucks isnt the mandatory hidden loading sequences. They are whatever. A price you pay for fancier graphics in the next room. WHat sucks is that the level design and boss fights will be held back. I remember them talking about kratos and baldur throwing each other into mountains but the PS4 hardware held them back. The realm switching setpiece with Baldur and the dragon was split up by two long cutscenes. It was epic but essentially a cutscene. As soon as Mark Cerny showed that Jak 2 screenshot, I immediately thought of how Kratos and Thor could have a fight where they throw each other into different realms like in Thor Dark World using Ratchet style portals. Just go balls out.More forced walking and going through cracks?
Lol fuck this shit. I absolutely hated that in the original game. In fact, that is a bigger crime than the fact the graphics look the same. To make this game on the PS4 is the worst decision ever.
This. Lately I’ve been feeling that console gaming is stuck in sequel/franchise hell and it’s all we get. Repackaged, reheated sameness. I’m probably being a bit harsh because there’s some new and interesting stuff around, but every major release of the year seems to be characters, a world and mechanics we’ve played before.Not to be too negative, but it's a pretty sad list of bullet points. Looks very similar to the last one, other than some added verticality.
Luckily the last one is great, so even if it's just more of that - that is going to likely be awesome. I pre-ordered, but still not hyped at all. I'm sure it'll be good though.
I do think the story and spectacle elements really need to deliver though to truly hit GOTY. The gameplay seems very similar to the last one.
Dont know if it's been posted, but there is 50s of Kratos vs Thor that got leaked:
[/URL]
"Oh, no. I say when we're done!"
Ffs. NopeDont know if it's been posted, but there is 50s of Kratos vs Thor that got leaked:
VEED - yt5s.io-God of War Ragnarok - KRATOR VS THOR Gameplay [PS5] God of War Ragnarok Gameplay .mp4
Make stunning videos with a single click. Cut, trim, crop, add subtitles and more. Online, no account needed. Try it now, free. VEEDwww.veed.io
"Oh, no. I say when we're done!"
Amen.
GOW being cross gen is disappointing as fuck... But you better keep that same energy when it comes to Elden Ring.
I don't want to hear a peep out of you about this
And then completely ignore, or better yet, praise this
Ds3 had better graphics than BB. If it looked better to you it had to be due to artstyle. If for no other reason because they improved their AA.Great to see you mention GTAV because that was the first PS3 era open world game that went toe to toe with the linear games ND, SSM and GG were creating. Great lighting, draw distance, character models, and level of detail. Everyone caught up thanks to 8GB of vram in the last gen consoles, but I look back and what GTAV did on PS360 was amazing.
DS2 had to be severely downgraded due to being held back by PS3 era hardware. Bloodborne looked great. DS3 looked a bit worse but still stunning in castle areas. The castles in ER look like DS2 level to me. There is zero light bounce. They feel empty lacking any character or atmosphere. Looks a bit better outdoors but nowhere near other open world games like Horizon, Assassins Creed, Red Dead etc.
Nobody calls Elden Ring next gen thoughThe thing that doesn't make sense to me is how people are either critical of GOW Ragnarok's visuals saying "That's not true next gen", but seem to completely forget about that when it comes to Elden Ring.
Not for me, Elden ring didn't look current gem either.The thing that doesn't make sense to me is how people are either critical of GOW Ragnarok's visuals saying "That's not true next gen", but seem to completely forget about that when it comes to Elden Ring.
You realise it's literally just a continuation of the last one, they started on this as soon as they finished the last one, its not a newly built game per say. It's essentially going to play and graphically look very similar if not the same with minor improvements and obviously some different character, enemy and boss varieties.Not to be too negative, but it's a pretty sad list of bullet points. Looks very similar to the last one, other than some added verticality.
Luckily the last one is great, so even if it's just more of that - that is going to likely be awesome. I pre-ordered, but still not hyped at all. I'm sure it'll be good though.
I do think the story and spectacle elements really need to deliver though to truly hit GOTY. The gameplay seems very similar to the last one.
Anecdotal evidence is what your friends do. AAA dev budgets skyrocking so publisher needing new revenue sources, causing many of them releasing games in more platforms, Sony reaching more players in other platforms and mentioning they won't publish all their games on PC, and PS being the main market for AAA games (and particularly the best selling ones) are all facts.Anecdotal evidence. Almost all my friends are PC gamers, some extremely hardcore, and from my experience the idea that console exclusives will somehow trick a PC-only gamer to buy a console is flawed. I have not once seen it happen. Tbh some don’t even realize the console IPs exist until they pop up on PC, and some can’t even play/aim with a controller.
No excuse, Elden Ring just looks bad. Having an open world is no longer an excuse for shit looking graphics, it used to be in like 2010. But since GTA 5 we've had amazing looking open world games. From just doesn't give a shit about visuals/tech. They should be getting more hate. I cant ignore how bad ER looks.
That is a very safe assumption.I need no impressions. This game is going to be fucking awesome.
Can you not buy it on the store, digitally?
Totally understand if you want a physical copy, just thinking you'll be able to pre load and be ready as soon as it goes live.
The difference is one vista is solely to look at from that one angle and the other vista (a relatively small part of a much larger area) is one that you can actually jump down and explore, while fighting enemies.
Don’t post this shit here.Dont know if it's been posted, but there is 50s of Kratos vs Thor that got leaked:
[/URL]
"Oh, no. I say when we're done!"