Hype for the 2,5 to starfield.
Always knew that snoot the hoot was the better game.
There’s a lot of comments like this, but that’s not how review scores do work and nor should they.
If you’re a reviewer you’re not looking at every game possible score and comparing it to every other games score.
Even if it was the exact same reviewer for any two given titles, broadly speaking you’d expect them to be reviewing the game on its own merits and deciding if it has done well or badly at achieving whatever it was trying to do.
There’s this bizarre senseless insistence from some here that any two different reviews from different reviewers of different games in different genres that may have had different level of success at nailing what they were going for - that those can just be instantly compared to each other and evaluated based on the review score.
How you guys don’t understand that one reviewer might like a relatively basic but well done game like some (easy) puzzle game with simple graphics and give it a 5 but also look at some some super ambitious, large scale RPG and give it a 3, I don’t know. One game was better at what it was trying for than another. But you guys want to flatten everything out and argue about why (usually) two different reviewers have held two different opinions to you.
I don’t know why so many of you can’t wrap your heads around that. I don’t know why so many of insist on talking about outlets and their many reviewers spreading over years or decades as if they are one singular entity.
Again and again it’s “i can’t believe two different reviewers at X gave game I like Y score and game I don’t like Z score, how does that make sense”. As if that argument makes sense, when it doesn’t.