Copernicus said:
The irony being overlooked of not wanting corporations directly on a site that a corporation uses to sell data stacks to other companies is interesting.
I guess so. I don't know whatever, it was ugly mockup.
I guess it's like when there are Starbucks pages and pages for you know, whatever. When there is a page my local movie theater, and your dads accounting business it just becomes a bit more icky.
Once people start to use G+ as a tool to SELL ME SOMETHING. It's different. This isn't about privacy concerns.
I have no privacy concerns on the internet. Or at the very most unlikely and nebulous ones, rather than righteous paranoia.
Even if it doesn't change anything about what is happening with my information. I'm comfortable with what Google does with my information, because I'm comfortable with Google and what they do. But The second they integrate brands and products into + the way that stuff was integrated with Facebook it becomes a different thing. It just does.
It becomes a significantly less desirable service for me to use. Just KNOWING that there is an official Angry Birds presence on G+. And I don't mean the creator's personal profile.