This is true.What? Google takes pride in their iOS apps.
Good for them I suppose, don't think there's a human who'd turn down that money
I think this is mostly a consumer hardware move.Fuck.
Google stop wanting to know everything about me
I still can't believe Apple didn't purchase them long ago, didn't the guy who start this design the iPod?
3.2 billion probably means there might have been a bidding war
What the hell? o.o
Sorry, instill confidence in what sense? Investors are very confident in Google, even after their crazy gains last year.Google's main problem is a complete lack of focus. This doesn't instill confidence, they're becoming Samsung.
Wow, people sure pushed the whole NSA thing out of their mind quickly.Google has already all this data on your habits, when you leave to got to work, where, what time you come back, have you walked at all this month. You, their user, should be able to use this data to make your life easier. Sure, they sell ad space based on it, but you should get something in return.
I love where Google is going.
Wow, people sure pushed the whole NSA thing out of their mind quickly.
That is more about the data than app design though. Those apps are mainly delivery systems for cloud data.This is true.
Google Maps is/was(?) superior on iPhone when compared to Apple Maps.
I wonder what 3.2 billion in cash looks like.
Lol it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if in 10-20 years the government forces Google to break up. No doubt lobbyists in DC don't want any one corporation having that much power.
Basic local controls will always be important for redundancy and safety.Again a thing I notice that people don't seem to get: it's dumb to turn everything into a smart device.
For example, what should the oven of tomorrow be like? Your average tech guy would apparently make it a radio, a display, a touch screen, allow it to download apps, etc. And that is DUMB.
The oven should instead have no more dials, no more displays, nothing left but what it is used for which is to either heat things on the top or inside. All it needs is to be able to send all information to your mobile device, and your mobile device must be able to control all of its commands. You don't need a clock, a dial, a light switch. Everything can be controlled by your single mobile device with either a standard control access or an app from the manufacturer.
Same for your fridge, your house's heating, etc.
If Google are smart they won't make the same mistake they are making with Google Glass, which is trying to turn glasses into a second mobile device, rather than just making a phone with a detachable camera, microphone, and thin flexible display, all components which are already found on your mobile.
And I'm not even talking yet about how even mobile phones themselves need to change (meaning I could lose my phone, come home, and still have my phone even if I lost it, yeah). Cause the first thing people will say is "What if I lose my phone! I won't be able to do anything anymore!". Wrong, your "phone", or rather mobile, is everywhere.
But regardless, we can see why Google is at least much smarter than Microsoft, which is dooooooooooooomed.
Basic local controls will always be important for redundancy and safety.
That would always depend on implementation, and well, stuff like kitchen appliances are usually not so easy to unplug and that's not going to change soon... but still, do you think it's a good idea to be locked out of access to your stove, microwave, etc, if, say, your router gets on the fritz?Quite the opposite, it makes it less safe. Only safety needed is to be able to unplug the device easily. Having twice the controls is twice as unsafe.
I'd prefer to see them nationalized as part of our future socialist technocracy. It'd be a shame to see their capabilities destroyed instead of commandeered for the common good.Lol it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if in 10-20 years the government forces Google to break up. No doubt lobbyists in DC don't want any one corporation having that much power.
Wow, people sure pushed the whole NSA thing out of their mind quickly.
That would always depend on implementation, and well, stuff like kitchen appliances are usually not so easy to unplug and that's not going to change soon... but still, do you think it's a good idea to be locked out of access to your stove, microwave, etc, if, say, your router gets on the fritz?
Can you purge the data that the NSA has on you? Because you can completely get off the Google train any time you want.
You are also willingly giving Google data.. The NSA is a different beast.
You don't need a router, the devices communicate with your mobile. And really, we can't design oven and fridges to make them easier to unplug?![]()
You don't need a router, the devices communicate with your mobile. And really, we can't design oven and fridges to make them easier to unplug?
Who says Google will delete data they have on you? When you delete things from Facebook, or your account, they just become invisible to you and others, they are still on Facebook and probably even still used for ads.
Who says Google will delete data they have on you? When you delete things from Facebook, or your account, they just become invisible to you and others, they are still on Facebook and probably even still used for ads.
seems like a lot for nest.
Ads for whom? They can't serve you ads if you are not using their services. I deleted my Facebook account. Permanently deleted, not just deactivated. How is Facebook using any of my data to serve me ads?
You mean the mobile I just dropped in the toilet? It's fried, now how do I turn off the burners?
Google+ required to turn on heat.
Great, one step ahead in getting mandatory requests to merge your private life with Google + every time you try to get into your house.
Do you want to use your real name on your thermostat?
- Yes
- Maybe Later
Apple is very deliberate in deciding which product categories to enter. I don't think they wanted to enter the home thermostat and smoke detector market. They have taken their sweet time producing a TV and/or expanding Apple TV which is a more sensible move.
is he part of the deal?
You unplug it.
Mobiles won't cost much at all because all the processing work will be done in the cloud by then, so you could have your full souped up fast mobile, but everyone will have a cheap mobile somewhere in the house like everyone has a remote control or two, and it will be able to communicate with the cloud if you don't have your real mobile. It will connect to your account, open the oven app, you'll command it to do whatever, it sends the signal back to your device, which sends it to the oven.
Hence, you can never really lose your mobile, because the cheap cloud-communicator device is so cheap everyone has a spare.
So the Google robots will know where you are hiding by checking the temperature of the environment?
None of that is nearly as convenient as being able to turn a knob if you're already standing at the appliance or device.
Look, I am all for a smart home future, and I love the shit out of my Nest. But there is no way in hell I would have bought it if I weren't able to walk up to the thing and twist it to set the temperature too.
I wonder if Nest has some valuable patents that google wants? Otherwise I honestly don't see much sense in this acquisition.