MidGenRefresh
*Refreshes biennially
Borderlands' art style, while controversial, was in my view the right choice. Cel-shading ages gracefully, I can still play the first one, which is 16 years old, and enjoy some of the vistas it has to offer.

STOP IMPROVING GRAPHICS GUYS!
depends on the settings. This game is letting users select a lot more settings than you typically see on UE5 games. If you want console settings, you can easily do 4k dlss quality.I don't think a 5080 should need DLSS performance on any game unless it does something insane like path tracing. We're talking about a 1000 eurodollar GPU.
Didnt RAGE come out at the same time? I liked its look more. cant find any non-bullshots for it so i will download and try it out today.Borderlands' art style, while controversial, was in my view the right choice. Cel-shading ages gracefully, I can still play the first one, which is 16 years old, and enjoy some of the vistas it has to offer.
![]()
@Bojji andSlimySnake
Since you guys were talking about it earlier, and since DF hasn't bothered to do a video about it yet, the only source that's covered Hell is Us.
Foliage draw and density seems to be the biggest difference between console Quality and Performance mode.
![]()
![]()
But on the flip side, it's admirable that all console versions with Performance modes seem to be a flat 60.
![]()
![]()
It's start to to be disgusting each time they show this shit it looks worse, this didn't even used normal current gen techs let aside ray tracing truly what the fu..?
The "it's all business" argument is the dumbest shit ever.Damn it, beat me to it. Just stumbled upon it on Twitter and came to post it. This is fucking ridiculous and retarded and of the highest level too!!!
It's start to to be disgusting each time they show this shit it looks worse, this didn't even used normal current gen techs let aside ray tracing truly what the fu..?
Only graphicallyHer face look decent i guess, the only positive i can find.
That's art.Only graphically
She ugly as sin
I think she looks better than the real life actress, and the ingame face is just average, not ugly not beatiful.Only graphically
She ugly as sin
Truly fuck them while game like phantom blade zero didn't use rtgi or nanite and it looks next gen compared to this shitSpiderman 2 had a pretty decent uplift without using RTGI. HFW as well. This is just laziness just like GOW Ragnorak, Astrobot, and DS2.
Alan Wake 2, FF16, and Space Marine 2 dont use any ray tracing either. That is not a requirement to make games look next gen. You can push baked lighting as long as you mix it in with high quality assets, expensive volumetric effects, and foliage. These guys didnt even try.
Watch John from DF give it a 50 minute tribute like he did with TLOU1 and DS2 while twitter praises it for running at 1440p 60 fps and not improving graphics.
StunningVery impressed with Indiana Jones - Order of the Giants:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's start to to be disgusting each time they show this shit it looks worse, this didn't even used normal current gen techs let aside ray tracing truly what the fu..?
It's start to to be disgusting each time they show this shit it looks worse, this didn't even used normal current gen techs let aside ray tracing truly what the fu..?
Game can look stunning and ugly based on the room\location, the plague of this gen unless you are a 5 hours walking sim with crazy bitches screaming in your hears...Very impressed with Indiana Jones - Order of the Giants:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's start to to be disgusting each time they show this shit it looks worse, this didn't even used normal current gen techs let aside ray tracing truly what the fu..?
She is barely a woman...I think she looks better than the real life actress, and the ingame face is just average, not ugly not beatiful.
Not every asian woman is a 10\10, and without heavy makeup that percentage crumble even more.
It's start to to be disgusting each time they show this shit it looks worse, this didn't even used normal current gen techs let aside ray tracing truly what the fu..?
Yeah like these outdoor level terrain textures become a blurry mess 50 cm away,Game can look stunning and ugly based on the room\location, the plague of this gen unless you are a 5 hours walking sim with crazy bitches screaming in your hears...
It's start to to be disgusting each time they show this shit it looks worse, this didn't even used normal current gen techs let aside ray tracing truly what the fu..?
They've been very busy lately celebrating assassination, please understand.![]()
Can we keep this shit out of this thread, please?
STOP IMPROVING GRAPHICS GUYS!
Yeah like these outdoor level terrain textures become a blurry mess 50 cm away,![]()
path tracing but with water reflections still looks like nonexistent, next gen level stunning
![]()
Yeah like these outdoor level terrain textures become a blurry mess 50 cm away,![]()
path tracing but with water reflections still looks like nonexistent, next gen level stunning
![]()
It's start to to be disgusting each time they show this shit it looks worse, this didn't even used normal current gen techs let aside ray tracing truly what the fu..?
RAGE was Carmack pet project, and the game supposed to usher the era of megatextures if i rmember correctly.Didnt RAGE come out at the same time? I liked its look more. cant find any non-bullshots for it so i will download and try it out today.
RAGE was another game unfairly criticized at launch for its visuals even though it ran great for me.
Tbh i never finished the game but it wasn't bad. Shooting felt good as with any ID-tech game.The game was also pretty great except for the most abrupt ending i ever experienced in a game.
Imagine shitting on the graphic of rage...gamers are really stupid sometimes.
The game was also pretty great except for the most abrupt ending i ever experienced in a game.
the level of detail in this game (and in doom) is really last gen. and im not talking about the water. jus thte ground level detail and overall detail in levels. Of course path tracing brings out the detail on some of these objects, but clearly not everywhere. this is why i was really pissed at them giving it graphics goty over hellblade 2.Yeah like these outdoor level terrain textures become a blurry mess 50 cm away,![]()
path tracing but with water reflections still looks like nonexistent, next gen level stunning
![]()
And necessary. We bitch about black leads in games set in Japan, ugly female leads, woke trans idealogies, poor performance in UE5 games, ray tracing artifacts, PSSR artifacts, it's time we get obsessed over lazy devs making last gen games then selling them for $70 after already charging us $550 for a console with the worst first party lineup in playstation history.Your obsessed hate campaign against this game has been truly entertaining!
My hate for it's Graphics comes from expectations for developers who was one of my favorite developers last gen, then they give you this bullshit after more than 5 years of development and can't even reach the graphics quality of some cross gen titles like hfw or even that E3 2018 tsushima trailerYour obsessed hate campaign against this game has been truly entertaining!
I think people were just too spoiled back then with a lot more choices. You had an amazing Bioshock game. Half Life 2 Orange box in 2007. Halo 3 and Reach had Bungie firing on all cylinders. CoD and Battlefield were putting out bangers year after year. PS gamers had Resistance, KZ2. Far Cry 3 was amazing. You had original shit like Bulletstorm and Borderlands. Next to them, Rage might have felt like a mid game. I thought the graphics were incredible and the main reason why i still remember the game. shooting was competent, but i enjoyed bulletstorm, far cry 3, borderlands, and other shooters a whole lot more.Imagine shitting on the graphic of rage...gamers are really stupid sometimes.
The game was also pretty great except for the most abrupt ending i ever experienced in a game.
The actual shooting was as good or better than fc3, borderlands or bulletstorm tbh and unless my memory is fucked, graphically i don't think it was inferior to 3\4 of your list but i could be wrong, i played the game at launch so it has been a while.I think people were just too spoiled back then with a lot more choices. You had an amazing Bioshock game. Half Life 2 Orange box in 2007. Halo 3 and Reach had Bungie firing on all cylinders. CoD and Battlefield were putting out bangers year after year. PS gamers had Resistance, KZ2. Far Cry 3 was amazing. You had original shit like Bulletstorm and Borderlands. Next to them, Rage might have felt like a mid game. I thought the graphics were incredible and the main reason why i still remember the game. shooting was competent, but i enjoyed bulletstorm, far cry 3, borderlands, and other shooters a whole lot more.
If it came out today in an era where Halo is dead, CoD is trash, Sony shooters are MIA, Avatar and Doom turned out to be mid, and borderlands still doing the same shit it was doing in 2009 then maybe it would stand out a bit more.
I wonder if we will ever go back to that ps360 era where devs were not afraid of taking risks. everything feels so samey nowadays.
Maybe now it would feel floaty but at the times i didn't noticed that much, hitting enemies was satysfying and it was enough to me.I played the first 20 minutes of RAGE, and it still looks impressive as long as you don't get too close to anything. Up close the illusion breaks, the textures are simply terrible by modern standards. And it plays like hot garbage, the controls are extremely floaty.
Rage was a nearly perfect 60 fps on PS360. Technological marvel.I played the console version at 30 fps
Well my memory is shit thenRage was a nearly perfect 60 fps on PS360. Technoligical marvel.
Maybe now it would feel floaty but at the times i didn't noticed that much, hitting enemies was satysfying and it was enough to me.
I played the console version at 30 fps so maybe that was partially the reason why i didn't noticed the floatiness that much, the framerate was probably chugging a lot in the most intense scenes.
That nighttime lighting is so bad. Compare this to the TLOU II forest sequence and it's actually a joke. I hate when games are lit like this. It's like they just slap that nasty blue filter on and call it a day. Make it actually fucking dark.
Looks much worse than horizon that is crossgen.God this looks so dated, wtf have they been doing for the past 5 years ?
Looks like the worst looking Sony current gen game
Looks much worse than horizon that is crossgen.
I'm not even sure it looks overall better than ragnarock...
The fact that we are even arguing speak volume.I'd argue Ragnarok was a bigger jump.
i thought ragnorak looked virtually identical like ghosts.I'd argue Ragnarok was a bigger jump.