ResetEraVetVIP
Member
Ghost of Yotei is one of the most beautiful games I've ever seen, the problem is the last gen assets, animation etc.
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Graphical Fidelity I Expect This Gen
- Thread starter ResetEraVetVIP
- Start date
- NSFW
Bitstream
Member
Agreed. It's Tsushima with RT and GI. The art style makes for some beautiful imagery, but it's closer to a ps4 game remastered than a proper current gen game.
ZehDon
Member
Playing on console or PC? On PC, settings pushed to max, I'm constantly impressed at how much stuff is on the screen; seems to roll on to the horizon. (I haven't gotten the flying mount yet, so that may change my opinion).
roosnam1980
Gold Member
Even on the Unobtanium settings you can see shadows pop in in the distance and lod when flying judging by the DF videos i've seen.
Gonzito
Gold Member
I know Bethesda is doing Fallout 3 remaster like Oblivion but after playing Oblivion I am not too excited for the quality of the remaster man. The experience was a mess
nemiroff
Gold Member
I guess it's kinda like Elden Ring, artistically a 10/10, but technically dog shit. It's crazy how RDR2 still having both the aesthetic and most technical assets dialed in after all this time.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
its not that crazy if you know how all 7 rockstar studios only worked on that one game for 5 years. Thats 3,000 developers, all cream of the crop (not some rando indian or korean outsourcing studio) all working on one game for five years. For GTA6, its 8 years and it already shows from the 4 minutes of footage they've shown so far.
There was an ex-ND/ex-Rockstar developer on youtube talking about how when he was at ND, he was part of a 30 person graphics team in charge of everything from the game engine to animations and graphics rendering. At rockstar, there would be 30 people in a team dedicated to animating climbing ladders or other small things like that. They had dozens of teams like that. RDR2 was done on a 1.84 tflops GPU with a 1080p 30 fps target, and it has a far better draw distance than even HFW which is running at 720p on the PS4. Granted HFW does do some things better. i wouldnt be surprised if they just had 100 devs dedicated to sitting around making sure they max out the draw distance in every single area by optimizing the graphics load for that particular area.
yes, most games have 1500 credits nowadays thanks to outsourcing but they are all still 100-300 person studios. They are literally 1/10th the size of rockstar. Even if you look at the credits of say a game like Avowed which has 1,400 credits despite a 100 person dev team (entire studio has 280 devs split across three teams for Avowed, Grounded and outer worlds 2). Well, RDR2 has 10,000+ credits.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
it only becomes apparent when you are flying.
the main thing people notice is the density of that forest. its unlike anything ive ever seen. i kept trying to explain this to you guys back in 2023 when everyone was making HFW comparisons. Now that people are finally playing it they can see just how detailed the world is. And not just up close like HFW, the detail extends well beyond whats in front of you. its only when you look out far into the distance in the second and third area where draw distance starts to fall apart. Draw distance in the first area is just fine.
Look at how far the foliage renders, how detailed the trees are in the distance, and even the reflections hold up. the draw distance issues only pop up in latter areas. And mostly when flying. Remember, the flying speeds in avatar are far far faster than HFW and definitely faster than Ghost of Yotei's horse.
Now this is HFW. This is a bad draw distance. Fog everywhere masking low res mid distance detail. Its effective at masking and probably something Avatar shouldve used in its latter areas, but this is what sucky draw distance looks like.
CowboyLou
Member
I'm not going to miss the over-use of distance fog in open world games, can't wait until we're finally over that hump for good. Hopefully Snowdrop gets a solid virtualized geometry system in the future. Also that HFW screenshot is exactly the kind of video game-y terrain I was just bitching about. Trees and vegetation too sparse, giant boulders strewn about at random, it just doesn't do it for me.it only becomes apparent when you are flying.
the main thing people notice is the density of that forest. its unlike anything ive ever seen. i kept trying to explain this to you guys back in 2023 when everyone was making HFW comparisons. Now that people are finally playing it they can see just how detailed the world is. And not just up close like HFW, the detail extends well beyond whats in front of you. its only when you look out far into the distance in the second and third area where draw distance starts to fall apart. Draw distance in the first area is just fine.
Look at how far the foliage renders, how detailed the trees are in the distance, and even the reflections hold up. the draw distance issues only pop up in latter areas. And mostly when flying. Remember, the flying speeds in avatar are far far faster than HFW and definitely faster than Ghost of Yotei's horse.
Now this is HFW. This is a bad draw distance. Fog everywhere masking low res mid distance detail. Its effective at masking and probably something Avatar shouldve used in its latter areas, but this is what sucky draw distance looks like.
Last edited:
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
When even Minecraft starts looking better than games from a certain publisher....
Xtib81
Member
You're not showing the PS5 version of Avatar. It looks mid on consoles. There's a lot of shimmering, poor IQ, terrible draw distance when you fly (that fucking sky looks horrendous) and no, the Ikran is not 'far, far faster'.it only becomes apparent when you are flying.
the main thing people notice is the density of that forest. its unlike anything ive ever seen. i kept trying to explain this to you guys back in 2023 when everyone was making HFW comparisons. Now that people are finally playing it they can see just how detailed the world is. And not just up close like HFW, the detail extends well beyond whats in front of you. its only when you look out far into the distance in the second and third area where draw distance starts to fall apart. Draw distance in the first area is just fine.
Look at how far the foliage renders, how detailed the trees are in the distance, and even the reflections hold up. the draw distance issues only pop up in latter areas. And mostly when flying. Remember, the flying speeds in avatar are far far faster than HFW and definitely faster than Ghost of Yotei's horse.
Now this is HFW. This is a bad draw distance. Fog everywhere masking low res mid distance detail. Its effective at masking and probably something Avatar shouldve used in its latter areas, but this is what sucky draw distance looks like.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
Performance mode or Quality mode? I dont think these games were designed to be played in 60 fps. Resolution drops too low, and FSR cant fix jaggies. the few third party games ive played on my PS5 are just fine as long as they are being upscaled at around 1440p.
The twitter clips i shared were mostly people playing the PS5 version.
Ikran is very fast. Just ran through some tests. Took me 1 minute and 15 seconds to fly 1 km in HFW. Took me almost that long to do 3 kilometers. So 3x faster. You can run the tests yourself.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
RR is probably bugged in this game. Shouldnt be this heavy. My GPU goes up to 350 watts when i turn it on. Otherwise it sits around 290. Same as Cyberpunk and AC shadows.RR in Avatar makes a huge difference but performance impact is also quite big:
In motion, non RR version looks like absolute crap.
My 4090 sometimes does shit like this.
Last edited:
CP2077
ResetEraVetVIP
Member
NVIDIA DLSS 4.5 Delivers Major Upgrade With 2nd Gen Transformer Model For Super Resolution & 6X Dynamic Multi Frame Generation
Upgrade coming to a massive library of over 250 titles with DLSS Multi Frame Generation, and over 400 titles with DLSS Super Resolution.
www.nvidia.com
ResetEraVetVIP
Member
Killer8
Gold Member
Every game which has path tracing seems to destroy rain effects. Noticed this years ago with Cyberpunk 2077 and recently the GTA4 path tracing mod.
mrMUR_96
Member
Yeah strange, I've noticed it too, probably sees it as noise or something.
Bojji
Gold Member
I think similar to Outlaws and Spider-Man 2 - it changes some settings with quality of reflections. And you can see jump from 140W to 240W on my pictures with 60fps lock, lol.
Ray Reconstruction alone shouldn't be this heavy...
Xtib81
Member
60fps, and it doesn't look that good. There's no way I'm playing a FPS game at 30fps on an oled lmao. HFW is much more consistent imo. Avatar has the best vegetation though.
Last edited:
Polygonal_Sprite
Member
Weren't the SSD's combined with the new micro geometry engines meant to fix lod problems in open World games?it only becomes apparent when you are flying.
the main thing people notice is the density of that forest. its unlike anything ive ever seen. i kept trying to explain this to you guys back in 2023 when everyone was making HFW comparisons. Now that people are finally playing it they can see just how detailed the world is. And not just up close like HFW, the detail extends well beyond whats in front of you. its only when you look out far into the distance in the second and third area where draw distance starts to fall apart. Draw distance in the first area is just fine.
Look at how far the foliage renders, how detailed the trees are in the distance, and even the reflections hold up. the draw distance issues only pop up in latter areas. And mostly when flying. Remember, the flying speeds in avatar are far far faster than HFW and definitely faster than Ghost of Yotei's horse.
Now this is HFW. This is a bad draw distance. Fog everywhere masking low res mid distance detail. Its effective at masking and probably something Avatar shouldve used in its latter areas, but this is what sucky draw distance looks like.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
yeah 60 fps mode drops to 720p in some areas. FSR cant handle anything below 1080p so i believe you. HFW on the other hand had the single worst performance mode ive ever seen. it took them 3 months to fix it. It looks extremely clean now but their internal resolution is around 1296p.
See if you can tolerate the new third person mode at 30 fps. Ive played a lot of games at 30 fps on my ps5 and even PC. Ratchet, Spiderman 2, FF16, Alan Wake 2, AC Shadows, Star Wars outlaws, Callisto, etc. They are all third person and were fine. The trick was not to switch back and forth. Took my brain 10-15 minutes to get ready and some games like ratchet and spiderman 2 were so smooth, i thought i had the 40 fps mode on.
Speaking of which, there is also a 40 fps mode for avatar which sits around 1296p on the base consoles. That's 4k fsr balanced instead of quality which can actually go up to 1800p in some instances. So 75% scaling. 40 fps is mostly fine on OLED as long as you disable VRR in the PS5 settings. Otherwise it adds stuttering on camera pans.
Last edited:
ResetEraVetVIP
Member
The scene in the Resident Evil Requiem trailer where she is walking down the street gave me the "next gen" feel...looks kind of CGI...
Last edited:
Knight of the Round
Member
My brother and I had this talk about game graphics a few days back and we basically agreed that texture-wise, we're more or less done. Reached the ceiling. What is now going to make visuals go next gen is lighting and shadows. And I think it's obvious right now that all those muti-gen frames that Nvidia is making is so that it can be able to handle the performance hikes that Path Tracing is going to be asking from the GPU.