I am actually excited for the game though, looks a lot of fun and I'm a massive Bond fanboy. The gameplay systems look fun to play around with combined with some cool uncharted style set pieces. But yes, I'm really not seeing how anyone could put this game up as top tier visually. It's not ugly, it clearly has some decent budget and work behind it, but it's really not anything special visually either, nowhere near the likes of GTA 6 or HB2.
Yes it is a glorified tech demo but it is still technically categorized as full fledged game so it get a graphic mount rushmore spot, the highest for now until gta6 is out and we check if it look like the trailers.
I don't give much fucks about 007 or uncharted games so they need to absolutely nail the combat and there must be a shitton of it to make me consider a purchase.
Yes finally, uncharted 4 was paced like absolute ass and 2 and 3 were far better uncharted games, had very underwhelming set pieces too despite being a generation ahead of the previous games.
you know me better than my wife.Without even reading his reaction, i bet slimy absolutely loved 007, the trailer was full choke of mindless spectacle
Game look like wannabe uncharted 5 and after u4 i'm not sure if i have it in me...
Sony really is doing all they can to not make me buy a ps6.
I mean it's not at the other monster's visuals level but it's at least it's better than anything else that run on regular PS5Why the fuck are we putting 007 among those graphic monsters?
Am i missing the joke here?
I feel like you're a big character model guy - the character models in this are it's weakest element - but they're a bit a stylized so idc.
Aside from above monster's it's currently better than anything in UE5 on consoles, maybe expect wukong, from sony I don't think they even come this gen (lazy developers)
Now i feel kinda bad fro trolling console only users that were hating on ue5.
Character models being cartoony is a poor choice. I think DS2 character models look amazing because they are going for a photorealistic look. I have no idea why devs invest so much into lighting and asset quality only to go for a heavily stylized look like this. it doesnt show off the tech that well at all. meanwhile kojima didnt invest in any of these next gen elements but went with a photorealistic look and was able to spam every cutscene with lots of light sources and shadows.Why the fuck are we putting 007 among those graphic monsters?
Am i missing the joke here?
God this was such a good looking game. I might double dip on PC.Character models being cartoony is a poor choice. I think DS2 character models look amazing because they are going for a photorealistic look. I have no idea why devs invest so much into lighting and asset quality only to go for a heavily stylized look like this. it doesnt show off the tech that well at all. meanwhile kojima didnt invest in any of these next gen elements but went with a photorealistic look and was able to spam every cutscene with lots of light sources and shadows.
They aren't AAA games, they are known for Hitman games which are AA.
Why are you in a graphical fidelity thread?
You say this comment on this theard is boring lol
There is a way to activate Hardware Raytracing in MGS Snake Eater, just add this in the engine.ini file:
A couple of screenshots with Hardware Raxtracing, 4857*1920P Ultrawide DLDSR, Reshade, RTX HDR and DLSS Transformer:
The kissing scenes are so fucking bad though. AC Unity and death stranding 2 pretty much solved this but Konami put zero effort into it hereThe character models look amazing even on base console level hardware.
Hitman 2016 cost $100m USD. The trilogy cost $180m all in.
lol that tree bark is ridiculous. its not just the textures and level of detail either, i just love the light bouncing off of those textures. its so beautiful.
Uncharted 4 does not have this level of lighting. It lacks the volumetric effects that give it a very thick atmospheric look. Check out just how many of the tunnels have this great looking fog getting accentuated by the sunlight. It definitely does not have that bounce lighting off the ground and characters. Try and compare the sunlight bouncing off of the ground, character models, cars, and well, everything else. You will see that the materials react much more realistically to the sunlight which is something uncharted 4 and well, most other games did not do last gen.
They ought to change the rigs next time too then
Some individual aspects were better, but the instant anything moved it went to shit. Whether due to the huge amount of visual artifacting or the completely broken animation and object persistence.Uncharted 4 does not have this level of lighting. It lacks the volumetric effects that give it a very thick atmospheric look. Check out just how many of the tunnels have this great looking fog getting accentuated by the sunlight. It definitely does not have that bounce lighting off the ground and characters. Try and compare the sunlight bouncing off of the ground, character models, cars, and well, everything else. You will see that the materials react much more realistically to the sunlight which is something uncharted 4 and well, most other games did not do last gen.
The interiors are much more detailed than most uncharted levels. I'd say they are more on par with the beach house in the epilogue which looked a generation ahead of other interiors in the game. Again, the lighting and material quality here is rarely seen in modern games, let alone last gen games. You have these corridors with an insane amount of different objects, and lighting that grounds all of these objects.
I really like that shot of the character model. The lighting on his face is perfect. You can actually see his face and all the details during gameplay. Why? there are a ton of lights in that corridor and most last gen games couldnt handle that many different light sources which led to a lot of character models looking rather weak despite having high polygon counts.
Then finally there is that big action sequence and the cutscene direction, cinematography, mocap and stunts are fantastic. Everything is shot like a hollywood movie. It's perfect.
If ps4 version of new RE happens it will either looks lastgen af, run as poorly as the last gen downport of jedi survivor or both, no worries =D
On top of all the inadequacies(like above mentioned framerate drops, or visible pop in durning care chase, some jaggies on cars durning airport sequence) are clear sign that this gameplay trailer(not some bs cinematics) was actual footage, not some doctored fake shit like we saw so many times before even from very reputable devs, which means we can expect ps5 version to look and run just as good(and likely it will be more polished so even bit better) than what we saw- dont have to mention pc version will likely have at least similar kind of colorado canion gap to what mgs delta has
Just wait for pc version my friend, its multiplat so im sure it will have much higher settings avaiable for better hardware than zen2 and rx 6700 we got in ps5
It the game is another shitty paced turd like uncharted 4, i don't really care about even trying it.Just wait for pc version my friend, its multiplat so im sure it will have much higher settings avaiable for better hardware than zen2 and rx 6700 we got in ps5
Wukong on consoles looks and runs like almost different game to maxed/close to maxed wukong on pc too
You were impressed by the explosions?
Yeah, on PC we can disable all this bullshit, fortunately.
yeah exactly, it literally looks like lighting is just turned off or something haha. All the same consistent light across the whole scene. No directionality or ambient shading. Looks very very flat. The character rendering is very poor too, very wax like and low detail. Artistically nice world, but would be underwhelming technically even for a ps4 game.
Did someone talk about the fx (smoke and sparkle from gunshots mostly) ?
