House prices did take a downturn too, after the house estate bubble burst.
Unfortunately investing in housing does not yield any productivity in the long run. Houses just stay there costing money.
You have to take into consideration that plot prices have dropped as well.
Eg one colleague said they had bought a plot for 40.000 Euro and it had devalued to 15.000 Euro. At that time some buyers from Germany were interested into buying, but the owners refused. This would be practically a giveaway!
Even the house construction business has dwindled.
But this did yield its results. Where Greece is cheap compared to other countries are rents. A considerable amount of Greeks own usually more than one apartments, a lot of which are empty and unused, so they look for ways to get profit. Though sometimes renting may prove more costly in the long run, since the owner has to pay extra to repair any damages.
Students and those seeking work elsewhere can find cheap flats or apartments for 150-250 Euros. In countries like Italy, Germany or UK those would cost 600-1000 Euro. Though situation got so much worse that a lot of students prefer to stay with their families, choosing a nearby university, instead of venturing to a distant region.
Rent in islands though is more expensive than in continental Greece.
Devaluation of assets is a risk that you take when investing. It wouldn't be a giveaway. It would simply be a matter of the buyers spending more than the property was worth and the new buyers offering something more in line with the actual value.
As far as people with more than one home, if you own multiple properties you are certainly not poor. By most of the world's standards, if you can own more than one house, you're very well off.
If what you're saying is true, then it is no surprise that some of the poorer countries in the EU are against just pouring more money into Greece. How do you sell that to the population?
It's funny that while everyone attacks Greece, no one is saying anything about USA's enormous debt/budget deficit. Imagine if China (USA's biggest creditor) tried to impose austerity on USA, just because "Americans have been living beyond their means for decades". That could potentially ignite WW3.
Then again USA is a sovereign country with its own currency and they can print as many dollars as they want. Greece lost half of its sovereignty when they joined the Eurozone.
There are only 2 possible solutions: they either lose their remaining sovereignty in favour of a supranational government (United States of Europe)
or they claim back their entire sovereignty by printing their own currency. There's no other alternative.
Most likely. They're afraid of becoming the next scapegoats as soon as Greece leaves.
No, apparently it's just Greece that needs reforms, not the EU itself.
1) If China tried to attack the USD, China would tank its own economy.
2) As you note, the US has control over US monetary policy as it is an integrated union. Greece is just one voice among more than a dozen, all with competing interests.
But who gets to be our Florida?
I agree. That's what is not adding up. Interpreting the referendum as saying that people would now accepted a Grexit as alternative to austerity proposals without debt relief does not add up in the light of Tsipras' statements pre-referendum.
I can only explain the actions of the Greek government as a thinly veiled strategy to initiate a Grexit without having to take prime responsibility for it.
In general, our politician's prime concern seems to be to not be blamed for anything that happens, while what actually happens is only secondary. Interviews with Martin Schulz, for instance, are pretty telling. Is stating outright that he does not want to be blamed for being the one that caused Europe to fracture.
The vision of a united Europe has given us 70 years of unprecedented peace and collaboration, which is pretty big deal given Europe's history.
As someone outside Europe, the referendum was seen as "Yes = Austerity + Bailout, No = Greece exits eurozone."
Varoufakis did, but then resigned, probably went back to Valve to resume work on HL3.
Gabe: So how's it going?
Yanis: Ok, all these stupid politicians.
Gabe: Want to come back to Valve?
Yanis: Nah man, I'm done with hats.
Gabe: You can work on HL3!
Yanis: Screw this euro finance crap. I'm there!
As an example of this in action, see the cost of SMS's - they used to be (in the UK) 5, 10, sometimes 12p a pop. Eventually the market forced them to lower the costs to basically free now, and the market could force them to do it because the cost to them of supplying the service is so low. There's only so much inequality a market can take before it's forced to recalibrate.
Not a good example. The cost of a SMS was always near zero as it transmits on a necessary part of the message. There is no real additional cost, aside from the mechanisms to track usage and billing.
Presses must be running, but are they stamping euro or printing new drachma
Stamping euros would unleash a massive shitstorm. Don't think anyone's crazy enough to try that.
They rejected it? I thought it's still being pushed. Guaranteed incomes are being considered in Canada and Denmark now, too. I bet most of the world will have them before the United States does, even though the country actually has a system of this kind for Alaska.
Alaska isn't a "guaranteed income" as the amount can change. It's based on the state's oil reserves. State makes a profit, shares that with the residents.
It's not inevitable as long as Europe retains the power to forgive their debts, which they of course still have.
Except this isn't just a bunch of rich countries versus a poor country. This is collection of rich and poor countries that all have to approve conditions to bailout Greece. Democracy isn't just for the Greeks.
Writing stuff down is hard.
Everyone is being a bit hasty here with hhe "no proposal! Headless chicken!", coming with a proposal right after the referendum would have killed the proposal right away. They had to meet first, it only makes sense if you understand the political implications.
That makes no sense. Greece doesn't have to show up with the proposal the creditors had in their last offer, but it should have shown up with some sort of proposal that had concrete information in it.
Not showing up with a proposal is basically saying "We have no idea what we're doing."
It is not Europe's responsibility to keep supplying proposals until there is one that Greece likes. If Greece wants to put one forth, it should do it.
They should stop wasting time discussing non-existing proposals and start organizing the delivery of medical supplies and other basic necessities to Greece.
Except medical supplies have been given to Greece, even though the hospitals and insurers are a year behind in payments. Drug companies have kept supplying even though Greece hasn't paid.
And it's not like the Greek government doesn't have money. It may be running out of Euros, but at today's prices,
Greece holds $4,220,377,650 USD in gold.
I can't believe that the rest of the EU thinks having to airlift medical supplies and food to a member state is better than cutting a deal.
What a shitty collection of politicians. I can't wait for 2017.
This is a failure of the Greek government more than anything else.
That actually makes it a super easy sell at home. They just gave him a big fat target if true.
"EU dont give no fucks about greece/democracy", so on, so forth
And the other EU leaders would be saying the same to their constitutents, "Greeks dont give no fucks about EU/democracy."
That's the thing about a democracy, not everyone is going to agree and if you're talking about all the citizens of the EU, Greece is a very small part. If the majority of the EU disagrees with Greek citizens, that is not ignoring democracy, that is democracy in action.