Relaxed Muscle
Member
Wasn't a Grexit like the best idea here just a few days ago?
No? People was asking for a debt relief and a stop to austerity as a real solution.
Wasn't a Grexit like the best idea here just a few days ago?
Wasn't a Grexit like the best idea here just a few days ago?
I don't think realpolitk makes much sense, at least when people stress political power over economic power. And I feel that a lot of people who talk about realpolitik mean political power.
We shouldn't, we like being independent in Finland. You can't compare USA and Europe.
The last appearance of Yanis Varoufakis as theof Minister of Finance in the Eurogroup, a few days before the referendum, was really shocking, as reported via information from Brussels.
In a moment when which Mr . Varoufakis saw that they would be faced with a negative wall and rejection of all and any proposal, did not held back and let a piece of his mind:
"I 'm sorry , you're trash ," threw in the face, leaving everyone speechless .[/B]
But none of them replied to not give some continuity .
Isn't likely to impact the US much, unless Russia suddenly moves in.
But in absence of Narnia, I think Grexit is the least on fire option.No? People was asking for a debt relief and a stop to austerity as a real solution.
Unless Russia moves in with tanks, the US isnt going to do anything. It can only increase tensions if the US tries to undermine some sort of Greece Russian agreement. And if there is one, which is unlikely, that agreement really doesnt matter to the US at all.
No, it was the second best, the best being debt forgiveness + all the other keynesian stuff, which most posters considered would be politically impossible.
Could you elaborate?
No? People was asking for a debt relief and a stop to austerity as a real solution.
I do not see the US getting involved even if Russia moved in with tanks. Look at how supportive my government was when the Ukraine situation escalated.
Something a lot of Americans are embarrassed about here at home.
That's what the ESM is for. It worked in the other countries but Greece has shown it doesn't take creditors demands seriously.I was not suggesting in the slightest that European countries should give up their independence. I was trying to say and forgive me for not being clearer that perhaps if the EU shares one currency than there has to be a more unified way to handle situations such as Greece instead of the governments of the lending banks only dictating what the debtors should and should not do.
I won't even suggest I remotely understand the nuances of this situation because I would be arrogant and stupid to say otherwise.
I'll never forget Hungary 1956. It was probably the right thing in the long run, but it was pretty shitty for the poor heroic hungarians who believed the promises of the states.I do not see the US getting involved even if Russia moved in with tanks. Look at how supportive my government was when the Ukraine situation escalated.
Something a lot of Americans are embarrassed about here at home.
Just self-referencing a number of conversations that I have had on GAF about Russia, Crimea and Ukraine. The people I am arguing with said it increased Russian power because of such and such reason. I said it weakened it because it fucked up their economy even more, left them with a dependent state, and hurt their international relations. I think you need to have economic power to have political power and Russia weakened their political power by weakening their economic power by invading Ukraine.
Greece is a member of NATO. We will attack Russia if Russia attacks Greece
Sure, how the time changed.
Suddenly the proposal based on the lastest Eurogroup proposal is worth fighting for.
But in absence of Narnia, I think Grexit is the least on fire option.
It isn't. It still is a terrible proposal.
Greece is a member of NATO. We will attack Russia if Russia attacks Greece
Well, Russia would need to invade half South Eastern Europe before it reaches Greece.
Also what is that nonsense again?
Greece is a member of NATO this is correct. But the relationship between NATO countries and America has never truly been tested.
I don't honestly believe Russia wants the political theater of dealing with NATO countries but for America to look the other way, and we basically did look the other way outside of monetary sanctions I think that gives Russia and also NATO countries on the Russian border a pretty clear understanding that America might be more forgiving and less reactionary to Russia encroaching on European borders.
Sure, how the time changed.
Suddenly the proposal based on the lastest Eurogroup proposal is worth fighting for.
Wasn't a Grexit like the best idea here just a few days ago?
The problem with the Euro is that the currency should never have been introduced before there was a solid fiscal foundation, where taxes were the same, salaries were the same & prices were the same for everyone in all countries wanting to adopt the Euro, but that will take decades to happen, all the original currencies should have been brought into parallel before using the same currency.
It would be interesting to see how China and Russia would have handled the Greek economic situation if they were more financially secure to do so.
The political landscape would have made for awesome armchair economic theory discussions if Russia had the economic capital to start lending or investing in Greece as the rest of the Eurozone just sat back and bickered about what was working and not working.
Sorry I did not mean to go off topic.
But for some reason still better than a controlled Grexit.
But is kinda sad that after Tsipras kneeling down, the troika still wants to kick him on the ground.
Not really. I'm all for option 2 on that german paper, provided you ditch the re-entry aspect, which is clearly delusional.
People seem to be quite a bit more baffled by option 1 and by the fact that germany, of all people, would even present option 2.
But is kinda sad that after Tsipras kneeling down, the troika still wants to kick him on the ground.
Honestly, regardless of the proposal on the table, that it is Tsipras' own fault. He was told countless times that the criteria for a new ESM-based bailout would be harsher than for finishing the running 2nd program. He just chose to ignore that. He lost his face for a proposal that he had already been told wouldn't pass. Why should the creditors have pity with him after all this crap he pulled off over the last weeks.
Don't forget Tsipras could have gotten a far better deal in february but decided to play risk and lost.
I wonder if the re-entry part was some kind of way to spin it for electorate. Pretty obvious that Greece wouldn't come back into the euro in the next 20-30 years.
As we said several times, we didn't had to go throught the ESM, it wasn't needed to be a pre-requesite for negotiations.
But the proposal that we are talking about right now is for the ESM. Tsipras explicitly submitted a proposal for the ESM. That that proposal is being rejected right now publicly is his fault. He always had the choice of just not submitting a proposal that he knew would lose him his face and that would not pass anyway.
But the proposal that we are talking about right now is for the ESM. Tsipras explicitly submitted a proposal for the ESM. That that proposal is being rejected right now publicly is his fault. He always had the choice of just not submitting a proposal that he knew would lose him his face and that would not pass anyway. He could have stayed true to his referendum and submitted a proposal with measures that he and his electorate actually support, even if that would mean a Grexit.
Not really. I'm all for option 2 on that german paper, provided you ditch the re-entry aspect, which is clearly delusional.
People seem to be quite a bit more baffled by option 1 and by the fact that germany, of all people, would even present option 2.
I wonder if the re-entry part was some kind of way to spin it for electorate. Pretty obvious that Greece wouldn't come back into the euro in the next 20-30 years.
Don't forget Tsipras could have gotten a far better deal in february but decided to play risk and lost.
Yep "Slovakia, Malta, Finland & Estonia objecting, reports @Elbarbie. EG trying to issue joint statement for summit"Portuguese media are reporting finnish finance minister is mandated to seek a grexit agreement
Portuguese media are reporting finnish finance minister is mandated to seek a grexit agreement
Yep "Slovakia, Malta, Finland & Estonia objecting, reports @Elbarbie. EG trying to issue joint statement for summit"
https://twitter.com/NickMalkoutzis/status/619989098145538049
Funny how most of the responses are about Germany, anyway.
But the proposal that we are talking about right now is for the ESM. Tsipras explicitly submitted a proposal for the ESM. That that proposal is being rejected right now publicly is his fault. He always had the choice of just not submitting a proposal that he knew would lose him his face and that would not pass anyway. He could have stayed true to his referendum and submitted a proposal with measures that he and his electorate actually support, even if that would mean a Grexit.
But just submitting a copy of a proposal that both sides don't want is just stupid.
Except that wouldn't be a solution, it would just delay the inevitable.No? People was asking for a debt relief and a stop to austerity as a real solution.
Yep "Slovakia, Malta, Finland & Estonia objecting, reports @Elbarbie. EG trying to issue joint statement for summit"
https://twitter.com/NickMalkoutzis/status/619989098145538049
Funny how most of the responses are about Germany, anyway.
Come on mate, you know better than to pin it all in one sole individual. That the proposal is being rejected right now is due to a whole host of political factors, among them Tsipras's behaviour.
I don't understand this. If France considers it good enough and Germany (and their proxies thugs) refuses it for totally political reasons, how is Tsipras fault?
Except that wouldn't be a solution, it would just delay the inevitable.
People say we need a transfer union. But transfer unions only work when those who're supposed to pay the bill also get to call the shots. And honestly, those who can afford to pay obviously know what they're doing, so it's probably a good idea to listen to them anyway. Would Greece accept a EMU Treuhand? An EMU that not just suggests, but enforces substantial reforms? Because that level of control is a necessity for transfer unions to work in the long run.
The reasons why it is being rejected are not my point. I am saying that Tsipras could have known that it was going to be rejected. Knowing that, he could at least have submitted a proposal that he actually supports instead of losing his face without purpose. In this case he really drove into a stone wall with open eyes.
Is Euclid Tsakalotos having the worst week anyone ever had at his new job?
The reasons why it is being rejected are not my point. I am saying that Tsipras could have known that it was going to be rejected. Knowing that, he could at least have submitted a proposal that he actually supports instead of losing his face without purpose. In this case he really drove into a stone wall with open eyes.
These countries that want the Grexit, are they going to fund Greece until the new currency is launched? How is it going to work, or has it been explained and i missed it.
It's already been announced that incase of grexit EU nations will provide humanitarian aid.(medicine, food, fuel etc.)These countries that want the Grexit, are they going to fund Greece until the new currency is launched? How is it going to work, or has it been explained and i missed it.
It's already been announced that incase of grexit EU nations will provide humanitarian aid.(medicine, food, fuel etc.)