benjipwns
Banned
As long as you don't run it like the Detroit Institute of Arts.Or open up lots of museum/art galleries... There's lots of areas within spending that bring back a profit.
As long as you don't run it like the Detroit Institute of Arts.Or open up lots of museum/art galleries... There's lots of areas within spending that bring back a profit.
Soooo, why?
There is no legal framework for a country leaving the Eurozone and not the EU.
Does this mean they cancelled the 11 am meeting? But that was Eurogroup and not European Council ?
No Grexit incoming after all? Wasn't that the main discussion of EUCO?
I'm not going to pretend to know the ins and outs of the US welfare system, but surely people who aren't on food stamps still buy food, no?So everyone should be on food stamps then.
Think of how much more they'd buy if they got food stamps too. And it pays for itself with the 150% return.I'm not going to pretend to know the ins and outs of the US welfare system, but surely people who aren't on food stamps still buy food, no?
That news makes me think there's no Grexit coming.
Do they need a EU meeting for a Grexit? Can't this be decided in the eurogroup? Or forced via ECB?
They don't need but there most likely would be all kinds of humanitarian ect. help that all EU would take part in.
As long as you don't run it like the Detroit Institute of Arts.
There is no legal framework for a country leaving the Eurozone full stop. It's uncharted territroy, and would largely be sorted out on the spot, I suspect. Nobody gains from Greece being pushed out of the EU, so a Grexit would almost certainly be from the Euro alone.
That's not entirely true. A state that would declare the euro no longer legal tender would evidently be in violation of several EU treaties, but since said treaties do not have a statute of penalties attached, there is no real punishment to issuing New Drachma and confining the Euro to exchange offices.
And, as Captiosus mentioned above, the Union predates the Euro (and there are EU members which do not use it), so there's no real weight to the idea that rejecting the Euro automatically means rejecting the Union. It makes for a good German talking point, though.
All member states except the UK and Denmark have to join Euro once they are ready. EU existed before but the Euro is mandatory. A Greek default pushes them ou the Euro which is un violation with that.There's no legal framework for leaving the Eurozone, period. The EU, as a political entity, existed before the single currency so there's no reason it cannot continue to exist if countries leave (or are booted from) the currency system.
That news makes me think there's no Grexit coming.
Seeing as how they haven't even been able to decide whether or not they're going to discuss the proposal out of Athens without groups from Finland and Germany taking hard line positions, I'm fresh out of optimism. Germany's ESM vote accounts for 27% of the total voting tally so if Germany votes no to any future ESM package Greece can't even get any aid under emergency provisions.
I think the cancelling of the EC meeting was done simply because there isn't likely to be a conclusion to the Greece Eurogroup talks today or because Tusk didn't want to split the attention between the two meetings.
I honestly don't believe Germany's leadership will be happy until Greece is forced out or completely crushed under foot.
All member states except the UK and Denmark have to join Euro once they are ready. EU existed before but the Euro is mandatory. A Greek default pushes them ou the Euro which is un violation with that.
http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/adoption/who_can_join/index_en.htm
Renzi: Deutschland darf Griechenland nicht demütigen
Italiens Ministerpräsident Matteo Renzi äußert scharfe Kritik an Deutschland im griechischen Schuldenstreit. Eine Demütigung Griechenlands dürfe es nicht geben, sagt Renzi der Zeitung "Il Messaggero". "Italien will keinen Austritt Griechenlands aus dem Euro, und zu Deutschland sage ich: genug ist genug."
No, that describes that except for two countries you have to eventually become a Euro member. That applies to all members, even Greece when they ratified it. So theyll have to find a special way to keep Greece in which is probably why they had a full EU summit.Yes, but that's something totally different. That just proscribes what you have to do if you join the European Union. Greece is not joining the European Union, it has already joined it. What you've linked does not say what happens if someone exits the Eurozone, simply because there is no legal material detailing what to do in such a situation. Pretending that it'd just follow the accession criteria again is silly, especially as Greece's economy is in a sufficiently poor state it would be allowed derogation rights.
Seeing as how they haven't even been able to decide whether or not they're going to discuss the proposal out of Athens without groups from Finland and Germany taking hard line positions, I'm fresh out of optimism. Germany's ESM vote accounts for 27% of the total voting tally so if Germany votes no to any future ESM package Greece can't even get any aid under emergency provisions.
I think the cancelling of the EC meeting was done simply because there isn't likely to be a conclusion to the Greece Eurogroup talks today or because Tusk didn't want to split the attention between the two meetings.
I honestly don't believe Germany's leadership will be happy until Greece is forced out or completely crushed under foot.
No, that describes that except for two countries you have to eventually become a Euro member. That applies to all members, even Greece when they ratified it. So theyll have to find a special way to keep Greece in which is probably why they had a full EU summit.
No, that describes that except for two countries you have to eventually become a Euro member. That applies to all members, even Greece when they ratified it. So they’ll have to find a special way to keep Greece in which is probably why they had a full EU summit.
Once again Italy can't handle Greece. why do we keep allying with you? >Italy indeed said "enough is enough" to Germany.
That news makes me think there's no Grexit coming.
https://twitter.com/OpenEurope/status/620154240862781440@OpenEurope
Slovakian Fin Min Kazimir asked what he expects today "Nothing"
Probably will be no deal at all because after yesterday it's basically dead locked.
https://twitter.com/OpenEurope/status/620154240862781440
Doesn't sound like a man who is going to agree to a deal today.
Whoah whoah whoa slow there buddy. Euro Grexit is fine but EU Grexit? I don't want that to happen.
Really interested to see what Italy and France are going to do today.
People who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. Just a fair warning. Even Italy said that Greece doesn't need more humiliation.The history of the NSDAP and the Nazi Seizure of Power is complex and not comperable to anything in Greece or in other parts of Europe right now or in the feature.
People should stop doing such comparisons here.
It's pretty obvious that most people don't give a fuck about history.Hilarious that the country that went through Versailles is basically doing the same thing to another country.
No I don't think nazi's or whatever are gonna go to war, but they should pay a little attention to history.
A permanent, not a temporary one.Wasn't a Grexit like the best idea here just a few days ago?
No, that describes that except for two countries you have to eventually become a Euro member.
Sweden is obliged under its 1994 Treaty of Accession to join the eurozone once it meets the necessary conditions set out in the Treaty of Maastricht.[1][2] Sweden maintains that joining the ERM II (a requirement for euro adoption) is voluntary,[3][4] and has chosen to remain outside pending public approval by a referendum, thereby intentionally avoiding the fulfilment of the adoption requirements.
People who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. Just a fair warning. Even Italy said that Greece doesn't need more humiliation.
I understand that it's not convenient/politically correct for Germans to mention Weimar Republic, but you have to deal with it. History is a bitch and it tends to repeat itself.Indeed, people who don't know history will repeat such comparisons.
Actually it's not that clear cut. The actual requirement is that once a country meets the criteria to join the Euro, it must join the Euro.
This turns out to be a crucial distinction, for example see this article on Sweden and the Euro:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden_and_the_euro
Their military spending has been protected because it's with German companies.
The European creditors want a sharp cut in military expenses, which the Greeks resist, Loch-Temzelides said. Creditors have called for an approximate 400 million cut in military spending compared to the 200 million or so cuts favored by Greeks.
I understand that it's not convenient/politically correct for Germans to mention Weimar Republic, but you have to deal with it. History is a bitch and it tends to repeat itself.
Insulting someone won't do you any favors.If history repeats itself then it doesn't matter if we know about it because it will repeat itself anyway.
So you can stop pulling out platitudes like a 12 years old school boy.
Yes, Sweden can avoid becoming a member as long as they don't meet the criteria. The link I posted addressed that point specifcally. It is however more difficult for Greece. It had the criteria and it had joined.Actually it's not that clear cut. The actual requirement is that once a country meets the criteria to join the Euro, it must join the Euro. This turns out to be a crucial distinction, for example see this article on Sweden and the Euro:
But Greece complied already with this obligation.
Firstly, Greece already complied with this - it entered the EU, and then entered the Eurozone. An exit is a different situation, and one which is not legislated for.
It concludes that negotiated withdrawal from the EU would not be legally impossible even prior to the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, and that unilateral withdrawal would undoubtedly be legally controversial; that, while permissible, a recently enacted exit clause is, prima facie, not in harmony with the rationale of the European unification project and is otherwise problematic, mainly from a legal perspective; that a Member States exit from EMU, without a parallel withdrawal from the EU, would be legally inconceivable; and that, while perhaps feasible through indirect means, a Member States expulsion from the EU or EMU, would be legally next to impossible. This paper concludes with a reminder that while, institutionally, a Member States membership of the euro area would not survive the discontinuation of its membership of the EU, the same need not be true of the former Member States use of the euro.
While a Member State may be free to denounce its EU participation and repudiate its treaty obligations in their entirety, it would not be free to go back on its decision to join EMU without breaching a binding obligation, under the EC Treaty, unless it were also to withdraw from the EU. Consequently, the only way to withdraw from EMU is to withdraw from the EU.
http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scplps/ecblwp10.pdfThe only alternative interpretation is that there was never intended to be a right of withdrawal from EMU, among other things because of the complex network of rights and obligations that EMU entails for its participating Member States and their NCBs and which cannot easily (and certainly not automatically) be unwound through a unilateral act of withdrawal.
Yes, Sweden can avoid becoming a member as long as they don't meet the criteria. The link I posted addressed that point specifcally. It is however more difficult for Greece. It had the criteria and it had joined.
http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scplps/ecblwp10.pdf
There is no way to unilaterally leave the EMU anyway. There is also no way to force someone out. There is no exit mechanism for the EMU.But this is not about Greece voluntarily getting out of EMU. It's not an unilateral action from Greece. It's about kicking them out of EMU. Greece doesn't want out, unless Tsipras does another unexpected step and asks for Grexit. That would be even stupider.
That's true. And if Greece wants to play hardball they should just default while being in Euro. That would be a wonderful mess to solve.There is no way to unilaterally leave the EMU anyway. There is also no way to force someone out. There is no exit mechanism for the EMU.
I suspect that may well be what's going to happen.That's true. And if Greece wants to play hardball they should just default while being in Euro. That would be a wonderful mess to solve.
That's true. And if Greece wants to play hardball they should just default while being in Euro. That would be a wonderful mess to solve.
For Greece, yes. They'd have no access to their own currency.
That's true. And if Greece wants to play hardball they should just default while being in Euro. That would be a wonderful mess to solve.
For Greece, yes. They'd have no access to their own currency.
They won't have anyhow any currency for some months. I wonder if it's possible to have another currency besides euro. Is it any punishment for that in the treaties?
Varoufakis was talking about introducing parallel liquidity, yes.
#basedvaroufakis
Seriously though, it's not a good idea, because it's essentially a default anyway but with less of the benefits.
A Greece default in the Euro is not 'a Greece default in the Euro' - they will just default and continue to use the Euro as a currency but as they owe the ECB they will I guess just be a non-Eurozone member using a foreign currency.