Darryl M R
Member
Some of those Youtubers have even expressed WHY they're donating, it's not a secret that some of them did it to protect the youtube community, they said so themselves when donating.
Even Leafy donated and everyone knows he's doing it so there's not a new status quo where Youtubers are being exhorted and suid left and right for all of their money.
You seem to think it's a bad idea to take this to court and not settle but if they settled, it still sets another bad precedent.
Is it a shit sitatuon all around? Yeah, it is, but E&H shouldn't roll over and let Bold Guy steal their money. Not just for them personally but for the whole of Youtube.
Key word is some in your quote.
I never once said it is a bad idea. I clearly stated that I think this is an opportunity for fair use laws, but this isn't a great opportunity because I think the context of the video will be looked at and not just the content.
There are more than two stances when looking at the situation it is not just: (1)I'm for Ethan/fair use or (2)I'm against Ethan/fair use.
I have consistently just discussed the likelihood of this ruling not going the way most of us want it to go and why a jury could rule that way.
Seriously if a little black boy can get gunned down and there is a ruling not to do anything to the officer, I have my doubts that a jury will 100% side with content creators on whether or not Youtubers can make certain videos. Common sense isn't common despite you wanting it to be so.