I agree with this completely, and thus far it is my biggest complaint. Some better shots really could have helped spice things up, and the color correction isn't the best- but still leagues ahead of the awful looking trailer from a few months ago. Its too bad, because I big budget really isn't required for things like this, and they can really help make the film feel more professional. None the less I walked away from this impressed, especially since I hated the trailer.
I can see the director at the end of shooting wondering why it doesn't look better than it does. It must be incredibly frusterating watching the dailies and seeing the production value not be there.
Really, why do the same shots we have seen in a dozen war movies of training or cadets not look good here? It really is the same content as Starship Troopers or Full Metal Jacket. I can tell that there are lots of places where the camera should never have been and vice versa. Thing is, Starship Troopers isn't that well lit of a film either. In fact, nothing Verhoven has ever done has had beautiful lighting but the production value is always there because every shot has a purpose.
There are moments in here that should have been paid off better too. At 6:09 when the Warthog drives in it is handled so very lazy. I assume the director just never understood that for many of us, it is the first time we have ever seen a real working Warthog. CAPITALIZE on that. That thing should be driving around the corner obscured by a warping heat haze through a telephoto lens. We should identify with it based on sound and silhouette.
When it comes to a stop in front of the cadets get low to the tires and have it kick up smoke and dust. Have the dust essentially be the thing that visually shames the cadets.
Then have the commander get out of it, boots on the ground first then pan up. Have him grimace at the cadets, step out of the way revealing a pissed off gunner manning that 50 cal with attitude. Make the moment bad ass! Right now it is just taken for granted. Do we get any sense that the Warthog is special, powerful, or iconic?
As is, the scene is basically saying, yeah yeah, here is a Warthog and here is a commander ho hum. Here comes a speech.
Really, the commander/sergeant guy whatever is doing a fantastic bit of performance too. Just it isn't being captured in a way that pays it off. Where is the wide shot establishing the man's authority? The commander should be nose to nose with Laksy in here focusing blame when he says "...all of us dead..." and then casting a wider net of blame with the remaining dialouge. I don't get a single frame of the guilt from any one of the cadets for their actions which is key to this scene. Without the guilt hammered home there is no scene.
Man, get the camera on the other side of the Warthog and shoot through the windscreen or seats or something to give some foreground here and there. Get low to the back tires and use it to balance a wider angle.
Every shot in anything needs motivation. The best commercial directors know this because they have 15-30 seconds and need to make sure every single image in their "story" is hammering home the point.
My problem with it is that all the pieces are here. The actors are FINE. They are just being let down by the production. The costumes, weapons, and everything are good, maybe they need a bit of wear but otherwise they work. Some of the shots are great, but as a whole it comes off like lower end TV and there is no excuse because the actors, cameras, sets, and support crew were all there on the day. It simply needed to be handled with more creativity in its direction and photography.