Sir_Crocodile
Member
I do not.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=129580
This was not exclusive to gaf either, the vitriol was everywhere
I do not.
It's hilarious to read how people are coping with the low review scores. The game does suck and HaloGaf's ego wont allow them to admit it.
Holy shit, with this info I'm surprised this score as much as it did.
Wait, there's only like 4-5 mixed reviews?Lol at this. Surely GAF is better than this no?
Are Halo's standards so high that an 85 metascore, dragged down by 4-5 mixed reviews is deemed a failure?
this is dumb solely because halogaf and the fanbase in general has never been hesitant towards claiming that a halo game sucksIt's hilarious to read how people are coping with the low review scores. The game does suck and HaloGaf's ego wont allow them to admit it.
It's hilarious to read how people are coping with the low review scores. The game does suck and HaloGaf's ego wont allow them to admit it.
Seriously? This is still missing? How can you release a FPS and still not have this in 2015? The shooting mechnics for Halo games are stuck in 2005. Halo 4 was such a chore to play because of this.
Seriously? This is still missing? How can you release a FPS and still not have this in 2015? The shooting mechnics for Halo games are stuck in 2005. Halo 4 was such a chore to play because of this.
Which is total nonsense and console warrior bait on your part.Except when they enter gaming discussion and Halo review threads.
What did you call mixed reviews?Wait, there's only like 4-5 mixed reviews?
If that's true that's such a shame. It's why I hate metacritic.
This is by the the most console warrior and fanboy bullshit I've read to date on Neogaf.Except when they enter gaming discussion and Halo review threads.
I guess I would consider mixed under 80.What did you call mixed reviews?
10 reviews > 90
5 reviews < 80
34 reviews between 80-90
Most reviews are in the 8x line... that is why the avg. is 85.
Amazing: 95+This is by the the most console warrior and fanboy bullshit I've read to date on Neogaf.
Congrats.
I guess I would consider mixed under 80.
This is by the the most console warrior and fanboy bullshit I've read to date on Neogaf.
Congrats.
I guess I would consider mixed under 80.
It's hilarious to read how people are coping with the low review scores. The game does suck and HaloGaf's ego wont allow them to admit it.
Only about a year I think. I think my 1 year is in a few months.Are you sure about that? How long have you been on GAF because I've seen a ton worse.
Even numbers always look better imoSemi off-topic: I dunno why but I feel 86 is significantly better than 85 for some reason.
So you don't thing the four sub 80 scores fair but the two 100 scores are fine?I guess I would consider mixed under 80.
Which will discredit them more in light of their 9.8 and 9 scores of Halo 4 and MCC respectively, granted that single player is definitely the biggest factor in their review scores.Even numbers always look better imo
I cringed earlier when I heard someone called 85 a nice "even" #
I have this feeling ign is going to give it a 8 or something controversial like a 7.9
My bet is 1.25 million in the first few days at the minimum, max 2 million.Do you guys think we get any launch numbers from MS or 343i soon?
I don't thing this time we will get raw numbers like previous Halo... just something about revenue.Do you guys think we get any launch numbers from MS or 343i soon?
They're all fair, I just think it sucks to have such good reviews to be dragged down by a few low scores.So you don't thing the four sub 80 scores fair but the two 100 scores are fine?
Do you guys think we get any launch numbers from MS or 343i soon?
Everyone gave MCC high scoresbased on nostalgia and before trying multiplayer, everyone knows that game should have got 7's just because it was half broken (if they dropped mp all together I would give it 9.5)Which will discredit them more in light of their 9.8 and 9 scores of Halo 4 and MCC respectively, granted that single player is definitely the biggest factor in their review scores.
7 is generous.Everyone gave MCC high scoresbased on nostalgia and before trying multiplayer, everyone knows that game should have got 7's just because it was half broken (if they dropped mp all together I would give it 9.5)
Agreed, the SPs were great.Everyone gave MCC high scoresbased on nostalgia and before trying multiplayer, everyone knows that game should have got 7's just because it was half broken (if they dropped mp all together I would give it 9.5)
Nah, I want to know how many ground pounded grunts have been killed or how many suicides happened by badly thrown grenades.What do you think? They'll use shipped numbers, and it'll be astronomical.
True all the bugs and such would drop it to a 57 is generous.
At least it's an even number!Score just dropped down again to 84. Yikes.
For me it was unacceptable because it was key feature of the game.True all the bugs and such would drop it to a 5
Which is a shame because it had 4 great games on there
This game is so much better than halo 4 and mcc is makes me nauseous.Score just dropped down again to 84. Yikes.
Yes but there are 40+ reviews outside these big 5.So the remaining reviews are:
IGN
Game Informer
Eurogamer
Gamespot
Gametrailers
So the metacritic could go up or down right?
So the remaining reviews are:
IGN
Game Informer
Eurogamer
Gamespot
Gametrailers
So the metacritic could go up or down right?
Nah, I want to know how many ground pounded grunts have been killed or how many suicides happened by badly thrown grenades.
Idk I was getting into matches of battlefield 4 by connecting to European servers instead of US servers, but then again I didn't get an Xbox one until the week of thanksgivings. I also didn't encounter the deleted save issue so maybe I'm a special case and I won't argue that list with you.For me it was unacceptable because it was key feature of the game.
To be fair these are the unacepatable launch games in my book (this gen):
- Battlefield 4
- DriveClub
- Assassins Creed last year
- MCC
These game were utter broke at launch and months after...
When you click the link it says 85Yes but there are 40+ reviews outside these big 5.
84 btw after few new reviews add.
Not with halo 5s mp. So fresh.That FPS fatigue is real.
Only reason I'm not buying this full price is my disappointment after MCC. I couldn't play MP almost at all for first 6 months, I played under 10 games in that time. I tried after every patch for hours. And after that, I couldn't get refund from MS and I was foolish to buy this game digitally. I know Halo 5 doesn't suffer from same problems, but this is only way I can show my disappointment..
I got MCC when it was $20, and it was the best $20 game I ever played lol, but yeah MP still didn't work for me at the time and doing co cop was a mess
Those are like the 5 biggest in my mind lol
And no numerical score will change thatBest its felt since 2 for me.
Lol at this. Surely GAF is better than this no?
Are you sure about that? How long have you been on GAF because I've seen a ton worse.
Score just dropped down again to 84. Yikes.