The Librarian
Banned
Lots of blame to go around with the Halo movie situation. Either way - we lost.
Cryptum.
They brought back 343GS (or a close varient)? I don't even..
His death in Halo 3 was pretty shitty, so I'm okay with him coming back.
Lots of blame to go around with the Halo movie situation. Either way - we lost.
Cryptum.
They brought back 343GS (or a close varient)? I don't even..
It was a simplification of the situation. Ultimately, they had the biggest responsibility to stop trying to be the big dog in this situation because they were out of their element (Donny). Of course there were a lot of factors involved, I know that, but those factors frankly weren't going to ever be as large of an actively damning element as Microsoft who was, by all accounts, hoping to be dominant in this relationship and not budging on that stance. I still want this stuff to happen, and I hope all the parties involved learned a lesson. I'm sure Microsoft learned how Hollywood works, but I think Hollywood is just going to keep being Hollywood until the end of time (though I imagine that Columbia would probably jump all over a project like this, with Sony being in the situation they are, financially). They're not going to change, somebody had to. A pithy line at the end of a post doesn't mean that I think they were the only ones at fault, just that I have higher expectations of them.Late or not, trying to blame any one factor on the failure of the Halo movie is ridiculous.
Primordium. It may have been a bit more tedious in the first half, but those last 50 or so pages were as close as the Halo novels have gotten to true hardcore science fiction, and it was fucking awesome.Let's get some book discussion going in here. It's been a few months (seems longer), but which do people prefer: Cryptum or Primordium?
I'm going to have to go with Cryptum because of Primordium's hundred-page long trip that went nowhere.
Future Soldier Beta is pretty good. Slightly overwhelming, but good.
You're viewing this from a perspective where a movie being made = success, which I disagree with. Simply a movie being made isn't good enough. A GOOD Halo movie is the barometer of success, and in that regard, the studios were more responsible for sabotaging the film.It was a simplification of the situation. Ultimately, they had the biggest responsibility to stop trying to be the big dog in this situation because they were out of their element (Donny). Of course there were a lot of factors involved, I know that, but those factors frankly weren't going to ever be as large of an actively damning element as Microsoft who was, by all accounts, hoping to be dominant in this relationship and not budging on that stance. I still want this stuff to happen, and I hope all the parties involved learned a lesson. I'm sure Microsoft learned how Hollywood works, but I think Hollywood is just going to keep being Hollywood until the end of time. They're not going to change, somebody had to.
That's where I think we're misunderstanding each other. I think that if Microsoft had ceded some of the financial strain they were putting on those studios, either by demanding less up front or putting up some of the production budget, they could have gotten away with having creative control without much of a fuss, leading to a greater chance of a good movie. That's not to say that they give away their merchandising rights, or give the studios control of the IP, or whatever, but just make some concessions in order to get what they want, ultimately (a quality movie that will still net them plenty of profit). There's still DVD sales, movie-related merchandise, whatever. It doesn't end at the box office. Hollywood is always going to be kinda shitty because everybody's trying to make a buck, but I think Microsoft could have, without massive changes, made things happen. I'm not placing the blame solely at Microsoft's feet, I just expect a software company to realize that the film industry isn't where it needs to whip out its dick and set it on the table. It's all moot at the end of the day anyway, arguing over what might have been is a little pointless. Halo isn't at the forefront of the public mind anymore, at least not to the degree that it used to be. The environment isn't really as favorable now, and it might never be again.You're viewing this from a perspective where a movie being made = success, which I disagree with. Simply a movie being made isn't good enough. A GOOD Halo movie is the barometer of success, and in that regard, the studios were more responsible for sabotaging the film.
What good is a movie if it's mediocre? If Hollywood got the rights to make more and ruin the fiction? If they destroyed the only two major characters that are important (Chief & Cortana)?
The fact that a movie didn't get made, but I rather no movie get made then a mediocre one and a situation where studios hold the fate of the franchise.
Making shittons of money like Transformers.You're viewing this from a perspective where a movie being made = success, which I disagree with. Simply a movie being made isn't good enough. A GOOD Halo movie is the barometer of success, and in that regard, the studios were more responsible for sabotaging the film.
What good is a movie if it's mediocre? If Hollywood got the rights to make more and ruin the fiction? If they destroyed the only two major characters that are important (Chief & Cortana)?
The fact that a movie didn't get made, but I rather no movie get made then a mediocre one and a situation where studios hold the fate of the franchise.
The only positive things that came out of the project where because of Microsoft.
Microsoft paid Alex Garland to write a great script.
Microsoft got Peter Jackson to jump on board and bring WETA Designs into the mix.
And although Microsoft weren't too keen on Neil Blomkamp, they trusted Peter Jackson enough to give Neil the reigns.
This is what I'm talking about. You think the studios would pay someone $1 million to write the script and make sure it's drenched in fiction? You think the studios would've pushed for Peter Jackson as a producer?
I find it so odd that you're ready to shit on Microsoft for not bending over and taking it in the ass by Hollywood and giving up control over their most important entertainment IP.
You're viewing this from a perspective where a movie being made = success, which I disagree with. Simply a movie being made isn't good enough. A GOOD Halo movie is the barometer of success, and in that regard, the studios were more responsible for sabotaging the film.
What good is a movie if it's mediocre? If Hollywood got the rights to make more and ruin the fiction? If they destroyed the only two major characters that are important (Chief & Cortana)?
The fact that a movie didn't get made, but I rather no movie get made then a mediocre one and a situation where studios hold the fate of the franchise.
Just finished Glasslands, pumped for The Thursday War in October. So many cliffhangers...
I definitely enjoyed the Bear novels more, just because they're so much more mysterious and removed from the rest of the fiction. I read straight through Cryptum and Primordium, while with Glasslands it felt like I was watching a TV series, but a good one nonetheless.
What does a shitton of money go for these days?Selling shittons of money like Transformers.
For those of you wondering what forerunner vision may play like, just try the GR Future Soldier Beta =P
Are we still doing the Future Soldier Beta Night tonight?
What time?Are we still doing the Future Soldier Beta Night tonight?
The article clearly paints a negative portrayal of Microsoft but I just don't see it. Microsoft had a deal. Fox and Universal accepted. Then Fox and Universal backed out because they started getting cold feet.Ya but thats not what the article says. MS was just not used to not being the guy who controls everything and then not get most of the profits on top of that. The movie industry isn't software and MS was out of their comfort zone. They already had a potentially good movie there with 2 major studios already involved and ready to back it, Peter Jackson, Weta and Neil Blomkamp involved and they went on to make an amazing movie together in District 9. What more can you ask for then that without knowing anything else about the Halo movie? Its a damn shame and its MSs fault plain and simple.
Yeah, lets blame Microsoft for this.In October 2006, right before a payment was due to be made to the filmmakers and Microsoft, Universal demanded that the producers deals be cut. Jackson consulted with his co-producers and Blomkamp, as well as with Microsoft and Bungie, and refused. In a stroke, the Halo movie was pronounced dead in the water.
I'm going to have to go with Cryptum because of Primordium's hundred-page long trip that went nowhere.
Cryptum.
Glasslands.
Neither. Glasslands is not that bad though.
Primordium. It may have been a bit more tedious in the first half, but those last 50 or so pages were as close as the Halo novels have gotten to true hardcore science fiction, and it was fucking awesome.
I definitely enjoyed the Bear novels more, just because they're so much more mysterious and removed from the rest of the fiction. I read straight through Cryptum and Primordium, while with Glasslands it felt like I was watching a TV series but a good one nonetheless.
BTB is turrible.
Doesn't make BTB any less turrible.You're turrible.
I don't really feel very strongly about it either way, but the characters and scenarios were interesting, and the narration on the audiobook was superb, really made it feel like a radio drama.I was onboard with this entire post until here.
Glasslands is easily the most divisive book in the franchise. The paper Reach; you either love it or hate it.
Yes.
What time?
I'll say yes, if we do it on Friday or Saturday. I can't do that during the week.Say 7:30 p.m. EST?
I don't really feel very strongly about it either way, but the characters and scenarios were interesting, and the narration on the audiobook was superb, really made it feel like a radio drama.
Sorry it's not embedded, I did it from the minus app!
![]()
I prefer Cryptum more than Primordium. A lot more. It gives a complete new hindsight of the Forerunner. What they are, how they feel. Didact is absolutely an awesome character. An old warlord. But still he has emotion. The conflict between the Master Builder and the Librarian. I do love Cryptum. But Primordium has my favorite chapter or my favorite conversation of all Halo books. The dialogue betweenMind blowing. So many things get revealed. I hope the 3rd Forerunner Book focuses much more on the Didact and the Librarian. It must...the Didact and the Primordial.
I prefer Cryptum more than Primordium. A lot more. It gives a complete new hindsight of the Forerunner. What they are, how they feel. Didact is absolutely an awesome character. An old warlord. But still he has emotion. The conflict between the Master Builder and the Librarian. I do love Cryptum. But Primordium has my favorite chapter or my favorite conversation of all Halo books. The dialogue betweenMind blowing. So many things get revealed. I hope the 3rd Forerunner Book focuses much more on the Didact and the Librarian. It must...the Didact and the Primordial.
I disagree. As long as it's true to the Universe fictionally and a good movie, I'd have been so happy.
I just want a Spartan Ops mission on Onyx, where we can see the camp site and Spartan 3 training centers, and the ruins. That would be amazing.
Sorry it's not embedded, I did it from the minus app!
![]()
Er, okay.
Glasslands is only divisive because some members of Halogaf have as big of a crush on Halsey as her progeny.