Perfect!
I think people here are missing the point. This isn't a case of "adapt", "it's the new way of playing", "we will figure out how to play with new features" The new scoring system completely breaks sport theory and how a symmetric competitive team sport is supposed to be scored.
Let me make a comparison of how the new scoring system would relate to other sports.
Football (Soccer): If you score and the ball comes back onto the field of play by either being struck by the defender from within the goal, bounces back out by striking the goal frame, or rolls out on it's own, the ball is considered to still be in play and may be subsequently, indefinitely kicked back in for further points.
Football (American), Touchdown: After scoring a touchdown play does not stop and you may run back onto the field of play and score further touchdowns until the opposing team is able to tackle the runner, or dislodge the ball and proceed to the other end zone where they may do the same.
Football (American), Field Goal: Once a field goal is scored you may have a player stand in the end zone where he may catch the ball and throw it back to the kicker for further field goals.
You see where i am going with this. In EVERY sport after a goal is scored either, possession is given to the team who was scored upon (Basketball), or the field of play is reset (most other sports). There is no symmetric team sport on earth (that i am aware of) which allows for indefinite scoring chains to be setup (Baseball is turn based, not symmetric).
Players will not be playing Grifball. They will be playing "Let's setup a scoring chain and see how many goals we can score before the other team gets their shit together.
This NEEDS to be fixed. This NEEDS to be fixed before the game goes gold.