OuterWorldVoice said:It's for a good cause, which will be revealed next week, I believe.
http://i48.tinypic.com/34do75j.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
It's awesome. I'm sure it'll help the cause =)
OuterWorldVoice said:It's for a good cause, which will be revealed next week, I believe.
http://i48.tinypic.com/34do75j.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
It's awesome. I'm sure it'll help the cause =)
I'm not sure... they look mean and vicious, I'm just now awaiting how Bungie uses their role.xDangerboy said:nope.
I thought they looked pretty bad-ass as well. And they role they are supposed to play should be very awesome if it works correctly.
Those three, Throwback, Mythic, and MLG, should be the only ones requiring all maps. Especially MLG and Throwback since they are such limited in the number of maps, anyways. Also agree with Syrup about map usage, but that's an old book.EazyB said:Of the 4 playlists that require anything beyond the Halo 3 retail disc, which do you think should drop the requirement:
Team Throwback
Team Mythic
MLG
Action Sack
Confidence Man said:A brand new engine that looks pretty much exactly like the last one? What the hell?
RefigeKru said:Character models and new weapons look great.
Everything else doesn't really move me. I expected better, but at the same time - I can't even expect the game to look that good as it currently is.
Fuck it, I'll probably get a proper look in the beta. One thing I'm interested in is the water tech, Halo 3's is still among the best.
Major Williams said:Agenda for Wednesday, January 20, 2010.
By: Frank O'Connor
1. Post on GAF
2. Yell at Bungle on conference call about crappy grass to qualm GAF.
3. Drink coffee provided by voc and cocop.
4. Finger paint oonsk.
5. Post on GAF
Frenck said:I still don't know where the trailer is supposed to fit in. If it is indeed the opening of the game, why does the GI preview mention that Noble team was investigating possible Insurrectionist terror attacks on the communications array until the Covenant revealed themselves to them?
rezuth said:Modern Warfare 2 has 4 player splitscreen, right?
Halo 3 is pretty damn gorgeous at times. Great pics.dilatedmuscle said:NICE
Of if they were carrying an AR.EazyB said:Mister Chief!
The only way those things would scare me is if my character could contract salmonella.
What I was going to post. I want to play the maps I paid for in more than 4 playlists. I wish there was still a way to play Longshore other than hopping in to Social BTB and hoping all 16 people have ODST.EazyB said:Of the 4 playlists that require anything beyond the Halo 3 retail disc, which do you think should drop the requirement:
Team Throwback
Team Mythic
MLG
Action Sack
Honestly, the only somewhat questionable one is Action Sack and when you look at what maps and gametypes it has it becomes obvious why Sandbox is required. I'm sure the 4 million ODST owners would love to get some more time with the maps they paid for. As it stands, it's rare as hell to get Mythic maps outside of those 4 limited playlists. Once Mythic 2 is finally made available for everyone I think they should bump up the requirements on a few playlists. I mean the people that are still playing Halo 3 two years after its release are the people that have all the maps and want the most variety they can get.
Why is that? Why shouldn't the maps be used in other playlists?Striker said:Those three, Throwback, Mythic, and MLG, should be the only ones requiring all maps. Especially MLG and Throwback since they are such limited in the number of maps, anyways. Also agree with Syrup about map usage, but that's an old book.
GhaleonEB said:Of if they were carrying an AR.
:lolOuterWorldVoice said:It's for a good cause, which will be revealed next week, I believe.
EazyB said:Congrats, Coco P. Now that you're rich you should buy me lunch.
...still trying to find a loophole in that part of the arrangement...OuterWorldVoice said:y u jelus?
P.S. Congrats to Cocop for being hired full time (after agreeing not to troll Ramirez with AR).
EazyB said:Congrats, Coco P. Now that you're rich you should buy me lunch.
Judging by what Mr. Morello said, and what we've been given so far officially, the conclusion is this:watership said:Maybe it doesn't fit into the game at all? They put it together rather hastily and said they changed what they originally were going to show. It might be like Halo 2's E3 vid.
dilatedmuscle said:serious (slightly off topic) question....
Which other game allows you to take 3 guests via 4 player splitscreen online and team up with another party online and go at it with another team? Halo 3 is my first XBL experience and i have to say, it spoiled me.
Madden maybe...dilatedmuscle said:serious (slightly off topic) question....
Which other game allows you to take 3 guests via 4 player splitscreen online and team up with another party online and go at it with another team? Halo 3 is my first XBL experience and i have to say, it spoiled me.
That's incredible.OuterWorldVoice said:It's for a good cause, which will be revealed next week, I believe.
[IMGhttp://i48.tinypic.com/34do75j.jpg[/IMG]
Diary, January 20, 2010.Cocopjojo said:...still trying to find a loophole in that part of the arrangement...
Also: thanks guyz.
shhh!Major Williams said:The weird bald men surrounding me have no idea of my plan to change the world to use ARs.
Oxymoran much?Major Williams said:Diary, January 20, 2010.
~cocoa pee joe joe
Day 1 of the second part of my plan to become like voc...
The weird bald men surrounding me have no idea of my plan to change the world to use ARs.
Link069 said:Hey if we're lucky we might be able to ride the skirmishers like Chocobos.
Taking screenshots in Halo 3 of the AR. And writing gameplay commentary on the balance of the AR.Domino Theory said:So what was Cawpo Jawpo doing at MS before he was full-time? Running around the offices with his AR?
Confidence Man said:A brand new engine that looks pretty much exactly like the last one? What the hell?
koshunter said:If Bungie fixes the IQ from Halo 3 and makes the environments less bland in Reach, I'm completely fine with those images.
However, what's bugging me is that I was always under the impression that Halo doesn't match up to other shooters graphically because to its scale (amount of enemies etc). From the replies in this thread, it seems like this is not the case. So my question is, is it actually possible to make a shooter of Halo's scale, with something that looks graphically like KZ2 or UC2?
I am being totally serious. My knowledge when it comes to game tech is essentially nil.
Delivered. :lol Awesome, and good to hear.OuterWorldVoice said:It's for a good cause, which will be revealed next week, I believe.
PSGames said:It's not a new engine unfortunately. :-(
OK.Thagomizer said:Yes it is.
koshunter said:If Bungie fixes the IQ from Halo 3 and makes the environments less bland in Reach, I'm completely fine with those images.
However, what's bugging me is that I was always under the impression that Halo doesn't match up to other shooters graphically because to its scale (amount of enemies etc). From the replies in this thread, it seems like this is not the case. So my question is, is it actually possible to make a shooter of Halo's scale, with something that looks graphically like KZ2 or UC2?
I am being totally serious. My knowledge when it comes to game tech is essentially nil.
Thagomizer said:Yes it is.
It's a matter of opinion due to mixed/ambiguous comments.Thagomizer said:Yes it is.
Dear god... :lolEazyB said:
PSGames said:It's not a new engine unfortunately. :-(
EazyB said:Oxymoran much?
I'd also add FarCry 2 in there. Sometimes that game looks mindbogglingly good.Frenck said:I'm sure it's possible but don't expect feature parity with a game like Halo 3. If we don't limit this discussion to the FPS genre I'd say there are two examples on the 360. Alan Wake and Assassin's Creed 2.
Both can visually keep up with the best of the best and still feature giant sandboxes.
NullPointer said:I can answer for myself. I see two great options:
1. Keep things cool, clean, crisp and simple, with lower overall detail, but achieve a locked 60fps.
2. Gears of War 2 (only with color and Bungie art direction), or something that looks more like the Halo Wars cinematic and/or CGI Halo 3 commercials.
What I think we'll end up with is Halo 3 with some more detail and better AA, but true believers will be able to overlook it because the gameplay is so solid. To me that'd be a shame, because the gameplay deserves a better presentation. Better graphics (and/or framerate) can actually make a game feel better, and that's what I've always thought was missing from Halo 2 on.
koshunter said:If Bungie fixes the IQ from Halo 3 and makes the environments less bland in Reach, I'm completely fine with those images.
However, what's bugging me is that I was always under the impression that Halo doesn't match up to other shooters graphically because to its scale (amount of enemies etc). From the replies in this thread, it seems like this is not the case. So my question is, is it actually possible to make a shooter of Halo's scale, with something that looks graphically like KZ2 or UC2?
I am being totally serious. My knowledge when it comes to game tech is essentially nil.
Kibbles said:Maybe GI is waiting for some embargo to expire to put up the new pics. Maybe EBGames broke this embargo by putting their screens up yesterday.
All the other updates have been put up at 10:00AM according to the site, so this is a bit suspicious.
This. New engines don't have to rewrite every single piece of code.Frenck said:Engine discussions always give me headaches.
Just take a look at Splinter Cell for example. Ubi Montreal started out using the Unreal 2 engine and they rewrote the renderer and yanked out parts of the engine to replace it with their own stuff for every new game. Does that mean that Conviction uses the Unreal 2 engine even though the engine stopped having anything in commong with the Unreal 2 tech somewhere around Chaos Theory or at least the very least Double Agent?
Or let me ask that question the other way around, do you seriously think that each new version of ID tech was build completely from the ground up without taking any lessons from earlier engines like the Quake 1 or Quake 2 engine?
Of course Reach has a new engine and of course Bungie will reuse Halo 3 tech where it is appropriate.