Heavenly Sword - IGN review (UH OH INCOMING)

Wario64

works for Gamestop (lol)
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/815/815721p1.html

9.0 Presentation
The cutscene work is fantastic, as are the extras (even though you can get most of them freely online).
9.0 Graphics
Beautiful in every respect. Character models are great, and the vistas are a-plenty.
9.0 Sound
Sound effects are fantastic as is the music and voice work.
7.0 Gameplay
The combat system is mostly very good, though the battles get repetitive very quickly and some of the extra stuff (like the button matching mini-games) needed more polish.
5.0 Lasting Appeal
The experience is over fairly quickly. There are a number of really good unlockables to go back and earn, though you can already get them online right now.
7.0
Decent OVERALL
(out of 10 / not an average)


Heavenly Sword comes very close to being great, but nearly every element of its design falls short in one way or another. The combo system is quite good, though it has a few holes (like no specific block button). The battles quickly become very repetitive due to a lack of interesting enemies and the "arena" battles that frequently pause your progress. Kai's sniper missions work well in theory but can be overly long, and some of the extra bits like the button matching mini-games needed a bit more fine-tuning. Heavenly Sword's presentation is stellar and nicely ties the action sequences together, but we just wish that the same amount of care that went into these cutscenes were applied to the game's pacing.
 
"Heavenly Sword comes very close to being great, but nearly every element of its design falls short in one way or another."
 
But I thought games with good graphics were supposed to be good!
 
Simply stating "not surprised" isn't good enough for NeoGAF. Instead, I'd like to thank Team Ninja for setting the bar five years ago.
 
onoz.gif
 
so it's the ps3s blue dragon kinda? :o

i'll admit, I don't have a ps3 but this game looks all kinds of appealing to me anyways.
 
5.0 Lasting Appeal
The experience is over fairly quickly. There are a number of really good unlockables to go back and earn, though you can already get them online right now.

This doesn't make any fucking sense, if there good unlockables why would you give lasting appeal a 5.0. that just doesn't make sense.
 
Am I the only one who saw this coming? Seriously, the videos I watched and previews I read got me thinking it wasn't that great, and the demo confirmed it.
 
So... Heavenly Sword = Gears of War? Beautiful, short and repetitive...?
That doesn't sound so bad to me.

But this seems to be a game I'll be buying when the price drops.
 
JudgeN said:
5.0 Lasting Appeal
The experience is over fairly quickly. There are a number of really good unlockables to go back and earn, though you can already get them online right now.

This doesn't make any fucking sense, if there good unlockables why would you give lasting appeal a 5.0. that just doesn't make sense.

It doesn't have achievements.
 
JudgeN said:
5.0 Lasting Appeal
The experience is over fairly quickly. There are a number of really good unlockables to go back and earn, though you can already get them online right now.

This doesn't make any fucking sense, if there good unlockables why would you give lasting appeal a 5.0. that just doesn't make sense.

because unlockables don't automatically make the lasting appeal better?
 
JudgeN said:
This doesn't make any fucking sense, if there good unlockables why would you give lasting appeal a 5.0. that just doesn't make sense.
I assume that's in reference to how short the game is.
 
In come the smarties and Nostradamuses!

I'm gonna check it out, probably a rental. I did really enjoy the demo, but if the game is needlessly repetitive, I can tell already I'll be thankful it's short.
 
JudgeN said:
5.0 Lasting Appeal
The experience is over fairly quickly. There are a number of really good unlockables to go back and earn, though you can already get them online right now.

This doesn't make any fucking sense, if there good unlockables why would you give lasting appeal a 5.0. that just doesn't make sense.
Because you can get them without playing the game. Did you stop reading half way through the sentence?
 
Every review seems to say the experience is over pretty quickly, but yet no-one gives any specifics. Why not just say "our reviewer got through it in X hours", different people have different ideas of a 'short' title.

That being said, duck and cover?
 
AltogetherAndrews said:
The lasting appeal one is the only section I have a "problem" with. I mean, I've seen games with shorter campaigns and no unlockables score higher there.

QFT thats what I'm not understanding
 
best rental of ps3 so far confirmed. i hope my dearly uncharted doesn't suffer the same malice of been so short.

but as far as hype goes, HS will impress a lot of people. they will only see the major flaw of the game playing for a good amount of time
 
I was gonna rent instead of buy anyway since this style of game isn't my bag, so this doesn't really change anything for me.
 
Fina1e said:
Please be good Uncharted.

PLEASE.

QFT. I'm still keeping my HS pre-order because I got a great deal. But I have little interest in R&C and am now pinning all my 2007 PS3 hopes on Uncharted.
 
i really liked the combat in the demo, so this is a definite buy for me, but i'm worried by the information that a good chunk of the game's brief playtime is spent sniping with kai, using some gimped non-heavenly sword, etc. i wish games would stick to what they do best. forget reviewers and their 'repetitive'
 
Mine at day one :D
Moreover I don't understand how combats have really the time to get repetitive in a 6-8 hours game when you have a lot of cut-scenes, playable sections with Kai with completely different gameplay and Dinasty Warriors-like battles. I finished NG Sigma a few weeks ago and it gets really repetitive... but no one complained about.
This review seems a bit weird and there's a strong feeling that the reviewer wanted to score it higher but decided to not put IGN UK in a bad position since they received a lot of critics for the review.
 
Top Bottom