Just a warning guys: on Saturday I cannot be as active as most people, but I should be able to post. This shouldn't happen again.
red hood already has a number of accusations levelled at him by this point, and here he simply bends to the will of the majority. Not inherently bad but it suggests he wants to avoid the spotlight, not tread on toes etc.I'll take this L. I just don't like voting early, but I see all of your points and it makes sense. Also flush has my attention because were weren't insulting each other(If i did I am sorry, I didn't mean to attack anyone)
Vote: Royal_Flush
The first line here is more worrying to me. The day has only just started so there's no risk of him missing the opportunity to respond to anything. But he seems more worried that a slow response would be seen as suspicious and gives a pre-emptive excuse.First of all my of pc just crashed so I'm going mobile for 10 minutes. And I was worried that I was giving that impression, I wasn't trying to copy you. Flush's post came off as not wanting to be involved in early game talk. That's why. this is feeling very similar to Star Wars, oh well.
I should be back to regular posting with hours left on SundayShouldn't be an issue as long as you are able to catch up and weigh in on any last minute stuff by 5 eastern on Sunday.
First I realize that I can't avoid the spotlight now, as much as I want it focused on mafia I know that's not going to happen until I'm voted out( because the mafia probably love me right now, with all this attention on me) And I did see having a slow response as suspicious. But I see your point.I hate to kick a man when he's down but...
red hood already has a number of accusations levelled at him by this point, and here he simply bends to the will of the majority. Not inherently bad but it suggests he wants to avoid the spotlight, not tread on toes etc.
The first line here is more worrying to me. The day has only just started so there's no risk of him missing the opportunity to respond to anything. But he seems more worried that a slow response would be seen as suspicious and gives a pre-emptive excuse.
It's probably the main standout post to me. I think karu had a similar moment under even lighter pressure
I... half agree with this. On the one hand we obviously need to give reads/discuss etc or we won't get anywhere, so I don't think we should be cagey about who we feel is suspicious (and to be fair, that isn't exactly what Corn was suggesting).I feel these "next 4 lynch" lists could easily be co-opted by scum to help them make a "next night target" list.
I'm not going to hide my feelings on who I want to lynch, but I'm not going to just put them in a nice convenient list. Not yet anyway.
Really? Satisfied with that?Thanks for the list.
Really? Satisfied with that?
Squid would it kill you to give some reasoning with those names?
I'm playing cod, wait your turnSplinter comes in and
1. Kicks a man who is already down
2. Half agrees with me
3. Poses an easy question
Hrmm... men who take the easy road bore me. Excite me a little Splinter.
To be honest I was hoping my early inactivity would get more attention (since I was active right up until the start). It got mentions but noone pushed it enough to be unusual. Bleh
I forgot this earlier, sorry.Okay cool. Let's get this started. I don't have any plans for the next few days beyond a company Christmas dinner tomorrow evening. Any one who hasn't said yet have a significant amount of time they will be preoccupied and not able to participate during this first day phase?
So we have a few people already posting thoughts on where scum will fall in terms of post count. Some suggesting policy lynches for low activity and others saying that scum will almost certainly not try to skate by based on the experienced player base.
Personally I think I have a bigger blind spot to low activity posters as I tend to have those I've engaged with and found suspicious higher in mind than those I haven't really engaged with at all. With no power roles to shore up that weakness, I am going to take a bigger stance on trying to make sure all are posting.
With that in mind, as far as I know Splinter hadn't posted since and start when I began writing this post so:
Splinter
What are some of your thoughts regarding the chances of scum skating by on low activity?
I was lamenting a failed gambit more than complaining about anyone else's performance. It would have been nice if an over eager scum tried to make a big deal out of my (couple of hours of) inactivity, but that didn't happen.I mean it was mentioned by me and Cabot, both and you've currently got my vote. Not sure what else there was to be done beyond waiting for you to show up and see if you are going to start contributing. Which you have at least some what.
Really? Satisfied with that?
Squid would it kill you to give some reasoning with those names?
To be honest I was hoping my early inactivity would get more attention (since I was active right up until the start). It got mentions but noone pushed it enough to be unusual. Bleh
I was lamenting a failed gambit more than complaining about anyone else's performance. It would have been nice if an over eager scum tried to make a big deal out of my (couple of hours of) inactivity, but that didn't happen.
I forgot this earlier, sorry.
Personally I don't put much stock in activity. Low posters tend to stay low regardless of alignment, high stay high. It's always possible for scum to slip through the game with low-middling activity, but since everyone here has played (multiple) games before they don't really get the option to drastically change their post volume - that would be obviously suspicious.
That said, I'm more worried about those low-activity posters at this point in the game. If someone like Corn/Cabot started flashing their scum tells at me I'd be more likely to give them the benefit of the doubt - I know I'd get plenty of further opportunities to analyse them
While I'm sometimes (/always) tempted to do exactly this on D1, the only time I actually made any attempt at it (that I remember) is Election - as scum. The problem with this line of attack (besides being quite aggressive and bordering on personal) is that it's a very easy way to appear highly active but doesn't actually help in the slightest with your own genuine scum hunting. In other words, a more tempting strategy for scum than town.There are players (none in this game) that I'd surely have no problem lynching early on, because I've completely disagreed with their thought processes in the past. I'm not trying to say this in a rude way, but I'd absolutely lynch whoever you feel is the laziest or dumbest player.
Quite... I don't even like X men
I see what you did there
I was looking through Mazre's posts as he seems to have avoided much attention so far. This is really the only point he's made, but I actually think he could be onto something. I know it's possible for this to be nothing - as Cabot was quick to point out - but at the same time this is an easy mistake for Scum to make. I remember Swamped did the same thing at the start of Dangan.The vote started out as a lark, he was the first person to post at the start of the day. His reaction of self vote was certainly curious. The content of his post I don't objectively disagree with but it seems a little odd to lead with to me. It's probably nothing but it's also strange that he capitalized "Traitors" in his first post. Ynnny does mention them but the way Flux puts it is like a proper name to our scum group.
Just depends on how much you value your vote. 1) See, if anyone receives a vote from cabot, that's just whatever. If someone receives a vote from me, they can be sure it won't leave them without major effort being put in or some fuck-up from other people...
2)You know what guys, I'm going to bed. I'll wade through this mess tomorrow when you are done insulting each others and look if anything scummy came out of it. Good Night.
About to hit the road for some holiday travel. Homework question for everyone else while I'm in transit. Who is in your blind spot at the moment?
For myself, I don't know much about Droplet, first game with her and unless I'm mistaken she has yet to comment on our proceedings (we're still in the first 24 hour window though) Additionally I know he's been here but anecdotally Burb hasn't made much of an impression on me so far.
Fellow thieves: I will not be posting in or reading the thread on the first irl day, but will be present afterwards including during the first day phase.
Just a heads up.
Really? Satisfied with that?
Squid would it kill you to give some reasoning with those names?
I'm watching someone's posts with great scrutiny, you know who you are, or maybe you don't, whatever, you're probably scum anyways. I'll say more later.
Splinter my vote is on you once I get my lunch break or home from work.
I have only had the pleasure of actually playing with Burb from this game. Well excluding ONUW which I don't really count. So I'm approaching basically everyone blind. And I expect many will feel the same way concerning me. Although like I said earlier I think I tend to overlook low activity posters so I will try to self correct (although it seems that there will be fewer low activity players in general which is nice).
What? The only way anyone interacted with me yesterday was in a factual way. (Like the your PR misunderstanding and the why-do-you-already-swing-votes-? from redhood. Even if you somehow missed the obvious hyperbole that "insulting" was, how did you get the idea I felt insulted? I think it's pretty obvious it was a pejorative label for the aggressive playstyle going on.I can't speak for others, but I felt your "why are you all being so mean I am going to bed " comment was fake emotion. Acting victimized or miffed at town over minor infractions is something I think scum does.
1. I'm just stating that my vote isn't as swingy as yours. That's a fact. I don't think I ever played with you, so my nearest comparison is Sorian and with him, he would just leave you alone as soon as he spotted something new. Both entrance and exit barrier for votes vary from person to person. As you may have noticed I have not yet cast a vote and will not do so until I find something that I think is scummy enough to potentially be basis for my final vote or until close to deadline, whichever comes first. As you are saying in you second post: Different playstyles. (I'll come back to this in my response to the next quoted post)I'll specifically point out exactly my problems with what you did.
1) I said a few times, what purpose does trying to sell your vote over mine achieve? my vote is going to be fast and frequent through the day phase, but I don't understand how that suddenly means it's of less value. It has the same purpose, ability as your vote. I just use it in a different way. I don't care for people who are willing to appear higher in some form of mafia societal ladder.
2) I've seen this before. Scum CB did this in Election, pretty much quoted events that happened, responded with 'lol, I'll let cabot sort this out' this is pure and simply experience based, when I see people who willingly say 'I'll come back later, let you fight it out first' I get flashbacks to Election with how CB played. Your point about seeing a bunch of townies infighting is credible, but hey, good townies should be infighting at this point in the game, it's usually one of the better ways to read someone's alignment.
I hope you now understand why my vote is on you.
Yes, it has some kind of shock value, that's certainly true. I just think it wears out if used too often. I think just putting the name in bold has a similar effect but without the fatalistic implication a vote has.Different styles, I know when I see my name in highlight tags I wake up a little more than just reading the page bare.
It hasn't let me down yet, also I havent RNG'd at all. I've given reasons for every vote I've made so far.
Hey Mazre,
Remember when I said I'd lynch you last?
VOTE: Mazre
I lied.
let's go, buddy.
VOTE: *Splinter
Hello, darkness. My Old friend.
Later on you give some not very strong reason for two of your votes (Mind that it was like 30 minutes into the dayphase):ah well Kawl's got this chump covered.
VOTE: Ourobolus
That's how you spell it, right?
The first vote that actually had a decent reasoning (altough the argumentation is you're "still not good") was the one on me. You do get that Ouro probably didn't feel pressured by your vote at all, yes?The reason I went for Mazre initially aside from the incredible usage of Arnie, was because out of the list, he seemed to me most likely to be the least active. In a game of reads and vote behaviour only, activity is paramount. A handsome bear once told me this in a fever dream.
I shall now move to Ouro who hasn't said anything yet.
I have an eye on:Sounds like you're seeing a lot of townies already. Any scum's on your radar at the moment?
I have an eye on:
redhood, because of how often he reiterates that he's town.
Ouro, because he checked in and didn't say anything useful yet.
I want to combine this with the recent question of who is under my radar (aka in my blindspot). These would be:
FluxWaveZ
CrimsonFist
Mazre
And here the opposite: People that behave other than I remember them, yet not in a particulary scummy way. It may be indication of scum looking overly Townie or just honest pro-town play:
Ty4on is more active than usual I think
Burbeting is trying hard to establish himself as a Town leader
And finally a list of people I think are Town:
Cabot
I know all of these three people have contributed in some way or the other, yet I find myself not thinking about them at all. That list is part of but not identical with my list of people I don't have an early verdict on yet.
Squidyj is just doing squidyj stuff, isn't he? Everyone with this behaviour I would find highly suspicious, but he always struck me as some kind of backup Darryl.
Haha
First things first
What do you mean with policy lynch?
Fake edit: Okay Google answered my question. Sure.
VOTE: Kawl_USC
I don't know you, never met or spoken to you. The silent one someone brought in on the last second. You ain't fooling me, sir!
And...
what's lylo? I get it from context, but still, just to be clear ;-)
So as someone who came out swinging with a vote what's your feelings on the difference of opinions between Cabot and Royal Flush? You voted early which leans towards the Cabot method, but also listed out 4 people who are suspicious of while not moving your vote off of your original target as well.
- it's all fun and games but in regards to voting often and changing it up, it makes a later hunt for early hints for being scum within ones voting pattern rather difficult. Whoever does it, goes up my suspect-list at the moment.
To change the vote early on several times. Not Voting early on in general. There's a difference ;-)Kawl, bringing this post up reminded me of something Karu said this morning.
So, I kind of feel his actions are at odds with what he's saying here. He voted on you early, and then he chastises anyone who's going to change their vote constantly through the phase. I mean his reason to vote you is not strong?
Were you planning on sitting on this weak vote for most of the day?
Should answer your question.Karu said:- it's all fun and games but in regards to voting often and changing it up, it makes a later hunt for early hints for being scum within ones voting pattern rather difficult. Whoever does it, goes up my suspect-list at the moment.
Maybe i should also adress this, heh.Were you planning on sitting on this weak vote for most of the day?
I'm well aware I've been quiet. I'll be able to post more later today. My work training will finally be over and I can focus on this.Apparently Droplet is in this game. Say hi drop
You too Ouro, where are the over-keen look-how-town-I-am D1 plays?
To change the vote early on several times. Not Voting early on in general. There's a difference ;-)
and @ kawl:
Should answer your question.
Yes, Cabot, my post didn't have much substance. But really, it was a whole 2.5 hours after day start - you want me to write a dissertation?