iPaul93
Member
Obama wasn't lying when he said she's more qualified than him and Bill are. You should clear your cache and cookies then google what she's done.
Hillary better than Obama?I don't think so,man.
Obama wasn't lying when he said she's more qualified than him and Bill are. You should clear your cache and cookies then google what she's done.
Hillary better than Obama?I don't know,man.
But you literally wrote "she's not much better"What I meant was although she isbetter than Trumpmiles
what makes her worse?
And we recognize that. The problem is the deluge of arrogant, condescending "us over here in Europe" style posts that pretend racism and xenophobia aren't currently huge issues there as well.
Edit:
We caught a live one:
But you literally wrote "she's not much better"
So she's not much better, but she's "miles" better?
what makes her worse?
She was caught lying over and over again.
Trump lies with every sentence, just fyi.
She was caught lying over and over again.
She was caught lying over and over again.
That will be the second debate.
Hanging Trump on the conservative party will not kill the conservative party. A conservative party will always exist because a good portion of our population holds conservatives values. Thinking otherwise is just a fantasy.
If Hilary wants to get something done during her presidency she will need Republicans to be less obstructionist than they have been under Obama. Trump has revealed fractures within the Republican party and its base that actually make this more likely - specifically that a good portion of the Republican base actually favors populist economic policies instead of free-market capitalism.
To co-opt or hold off future nativist populists, the Republican party is going to have to make some changes. This is where throwing Republicans a lifeline makes a lot of sense. People are more likely to work with you if you give them a way out of shitty situation instead of shit on their indentity and dignity.
And, in the end, that is what is important. Getting things done is more important than making yourself feel good by really laying into someone. Will it work? Who knows, but the benefits outweigh the alternative.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/clinton-paul-ryan-poverty-plan-227207
That article is a good indication of what a first step might look like in a Clinton presidency. Paul Ryan - basically an economic libertarian - is receptive towards a bill that fights poverty with money. He and the Republican party are receptive because they now realize that their base doesnt give two shits about economic libertarianism. They voted Republican because of conservative social values and white identity politics. That has them scared. Why make it harder to get things done by shitting on them?
Moreover, you are also shitting on people who identify themselves as Republican. Give them an out so they can tell themselves that the Republican party abandoned them. They didn't abandon the Republican party. If you say the Republican party was always shit, then that has a lot less of a chance of happening.
Also, Republicans didn't tank the economy.
No, Obama knew exactly where Romney was going with it. Mittens had been dancing around that statement for weeks and when he started in on it with the debate Obama reeled him in with "Please proceed, Governor" as him basically saying "your neck is in the noose now motherfucker, watch me pull this here leaver".I don't think that classes as a takedown.
That was more "I'm tired of listing to your shit, hurry up".
Good post, but the bold.
If Republicans didn't tank the economy, who did?
Mainstream GOP is the party that invaded Iraq, destroyed the economy, continues to enforce policies EXTREMELY harmful to lgbtq and women, and tried to block Obama on every good policy he put forward. The AltRight/Trump have done nothing in comparison to the harms of mainstream conservatism. This was a stupid speech and an unnecessary pivot to appease people who will not help her once she is in office. America doesnt need a conservative party and she should be hanging trump on them
Good post, but the bold.
If Republicans didn't tank the economy, who did?
Hanging Trump on the conservative party will not kill the conservative party. A conservative party will always exist because a good portion of our population holds conservatives values. Thinking otherwise is just a fantasy.
If Hilary wants to get something done during her presidency she will need Republicans to be less obstructionist than they have been under Obama. Trump has revealed fractures within the Republican party and its base that actually make this more likely - specifically that a good portion of the Republican base actually favors populist economic policies instead of free-market capitalism.
To co-opt or hold off future nativist populists, the Republican party is going to have to make some changes. This is where throwing Republicans a lifeline makes a lot of sense. People are more likely to work with you if you give them a way out of shitty situation instead of shit on their indentity and dignity.
And, in the end, that is what is important. Getting things done is more important than making yourself feel good by really laying into someone. Will it work? Who knows, but the benefits outweigh the alternative.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/clinton-paul-ryan-poverty-plan-227207
That article is a good indication of what a first step might look like in a Clinton presidency. Paul Ryan - basically an economic libertarian - is receptive towards a bill that fights poverty with money. He and the Republican party are receptive because they now realize that their base doesnt give two shits about economic libertarianism. They voted Republican because of conservative social values and white identity politics. That has them scared. Why make it harder to get things done by shitting on them?
Moreover, you are also shitting on people who identify themselves as Republican. Give them an out so they can tell themselves that the Republican party abandoned them. They didn't abandon the Republican party. If you say the Republican party was always shit, then that has a lot less of a chance of happening.
Also, Republicans didn't tank the economy.
The alt right is fascism with memes
Awesome summary, TheCoastlinehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news.../hillary-clintons-alt-right-speech-annotated/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_soeyHVrawY#t=20m0s
Fuck Trump, fuck the alt-right, fuck Brexit, fuck voat, fuck 4chan, fuck Breitbart, fuck Gamergate, fuck Alex Jones, fuck /r/the_donald, fuck Milo, and fuck anyone who stands for this.
Video has more dislikes than likes. I've heard that means Trump will win.
Hillary lying once again...
Alt-right is different than the right. This might be her biggest lie yet.
Hillary lying once again...
Alt-right is different than the right. This might be her biggest lie yet.
Good post, but the bold.
If Republicans didn't tank the economy, who did?
Yes and Trump is alt right.
That's literally her point.
DrForester is saying that the Alt-Right is no different than the Right.
He's right in that the Alt-Right are the same as voters on the Right in beliefs on race, sex, gender, and equality.
Where I disagree is how that is vocalized. Politicians on the right would throw some hints toward their voters but wouldn't be overt with expressing their views. The Alt-Right has no desire to mask their beliefs.
Seriously though is there like a cyber war room of Trump supporters disliking every single Hillary video? I don't see this on Trump side but it is like every Hillary video quickly gets bombarded with dislikes.
Seriously though is there like a cyber war room of Trump supporters disliking every single Hillary video? I don't see this on Trump side but it is like every Hillary video quickly gets bombarded with dislikes.
Good observation.
How does throwing "sensible" Republicans a rhetorical life raft not undermine the cause of electing a Democratic house and Senate, though?
This is hardly just a leftist critique, I should note - the DNC email leaks reveal that there's been vigorous debate within the party about this very issue.
Good observation.
She was caught lying over and over again.
Yes and Trump is alt right.
That's literally her point.
DrForester is saying that the Alt-Right is no different than the Right.
He's right in that the Alt-Right are the same as voters on the Right in beliefs on race, sex, gender, and equality.
Where I disagree is how that is vocalized. Politicians on the right would throw some hints toward their voters but wouldn't be overt with expressing their views. The Alt-Right has no desire to mask their beliefs.
Hillary better than Obama?I don't think so,man.