What other games offer 2080s performance in an AMD optimized game, or neutral game for that matter? I'll wait for you to struggle for examples... Especially ones that have same quality, resolution and framerates. Take your time though
Yes 44% higher res, atleast I am not is denying that. The shadows quality is also better on XsX.
This game looks like it is rasterization heavy, this is where we have seen and can expect PS5 beat XsX everytime.
I think whatHeisenberg007 is saying, is that with dynamic res we would know, what PS5 would be able to do on this engine.
But for me that is pure speculation because the Devs decided for the locked lower res on PS5.
Clear win for XsX as it is, if that is important.
I know you constantly talk about VRR.
You obviously don't understand the word constant either.
What lower effects?
-Hitman 3 is showing the floor at 5700-5700xt level
That'll open a new pandora box, man, so ignore it. But there are missing smoke effects on XSX and lower-quality textures on certain surfaces when compared to textures on PS5.
If you are referring to the KingThrash video, i dont think thats a reliable example. I would be very interested to see other examples could you PM them to me?
In peak texture rate, fillrate and compute, the PS5 GPU exceeds the 5700 XT. It has the same amount of total bandwidth, but has to share some of the bandwith with the CPU.
I haven't watched any of the videos about it so I am a bit out of the loop
(only heard about the res and shadow differences and the Pro having 1080p/60fps option), if I get the game it will be later when I am done with my backlog and when it's dropped in price. I still have Valhalla, Immortals, Cyberpunk (when that shit ever stops crashing) and some other crap to finish 
It's CONSTANT on PS5.
Again not CONSTANT. Drops below 4k are "uncommon"
Im having trouble understanding your stance on this. Are you saying that because the XsX holds a 44% advantage in res which is constant (with minor fps dips) that this somehow invalidates the games in which PS5 had better performance because its impossible to point to a sequence with a constant advantage on PS5?
Again not CONSTANT. Drops below 4k are "uncommon"
So in other words like a 5700... You're not showing me otherwise with that.
If ps5 struggles to hold 60fps 99% of the time, what would an uncapped benchmark do to help it, when there are gpu's that hold above 60fps, and never dip into the 60s? There are plenty of DF, NX, etc videos that show this. Especially as consoles aren't using ultra settings on everything.
"In other words" you have your head in the sand and refuse to accept or acknowledge fact because you have a set agenda to paint the PS5 as a 5700 equivalent. Were done here.
The PS5 is at a bandwidth disadvantage relative to the 5700 XT, but has a much higher fillrate due to the clockspeed differential and if it can stay close to its peak clocks, it will have a compute advantage as well, especially since the 9.75 TF figure for the 5700 XT is with the boost clock, not game clock.
So wouldnt that indicate this game is the outlier and not the standard?
With all due respect that all sounds like speculation.
I am referring to that video. He did a lot of bullshit in that video, so ignore all that. But the last minute of his video shows side-by-side comparisons -- many of those screens are from the DF video (which shows no smoke effects on XSX when it does on PS5, for example).
It doesn't have RT yet so it's probably at least a little rushed.
S|X runs at a solid 60, except that one particular area.
Darius87
gives me emoji reactions. You can just see/hear the seething wherever it comes to every comparison that PC is in. I'm glad I could never be as jealous/salty as you, ever. Thanks again for the reaction score! 
He might ask for ur number next or try to twiddle ur piddleLol not gonna lie, but it's hilarious whenever the console warrior,
P.S. you never proved me wrong, or anyone else for that matter, in the other thread.
Wouldn't even be surprised honestly. I just find it humorous either way. It's flattering, but also creepy/cringey at the same time. I just pm'ed him, asking why he's so salty? Hopefully I get a response.
You would be loosing your time, he is already mentioning that shit video.
I can only see them overhauling their engine/graphics pipeline and the likes once they leave behind last-gen consoles. You won't see major efforts poured into these new consoles as long as cross-gen exists.
Damn, what a sad loser.Lol not gonna lie, but it's hilarious whenever the console warrior,
P.S. you never proved me wrong, or anyone else for that matter, in the other thread.
Maybe, but maybe other developers find a way to work around these constraints. It seems to happen every console gen.
Alex sounds like a super noob. Who the hell doesn't disable Motion Blur when its optional and can be deactivated?While everyone spill their spaghetti all over the percentages with the GPUs we have actual settings:
And this is not a small difference.
What a great and insightful contribution to the forum...
There aren't any other examples, he's talking about that awful KingTrash video.
I love motion blur.
Wait what since when was the memory on ps5 shared? It aint shared its unified and when does hitman ever run good on all systems the glacier engine sucks ass
Shared between cpu and gpu, this is how apus are designed
Just bandwidth don't solve this issue, you also need a good latency and that's not a strength suit, by anything which is called GDDR. Since you have just one pool you need to write and read things with great care and that's with parallel computing fairly difficult. But yeah MS with wider memory interface have upper hand with this, most likely.
That's because 5700XT beat 2080, not because PS5 or Xbox is on that level of performance.
Why? It's made to hide low framerate.
