Support NeoGAF

[Ogodei]

Given persistent criticism about her performance as Mystique in the post-trilogy X-Men movies, the failure of Mother! and the mixed reception of Passengers, is it safe to say that the "highest paid actress in Hollywood" has just been coasting on Hunger Games heat this whole time?

I guess the best counterarguments are Winter's Bone (which is underappreciated), and her role in American Hustle, though it's notable that the former was before Hunger Games at all and the latter was midway through the Hunger Games movies.

Joy's probably the strongest counterargument, but i'm not sure of how much staying power that movie's had.

 

[Peru]

no

 

[maxcriden]

No, she's an actress who has appeared in good and bad films like most/all actors and actresses.

Joy was really dry and unpleasant to sit through, but I was immensely impressed with her acting in Silver Linings Playbook and I enjoyed her roles in the Hunger Games. She put in good effort in Passengers despite the off-putting plotline. She did well in Hunger Games.

 

[DOWN]

? She’s great in anything besides X Men. She’s talented.

Silver Linings
Joy
American Hustle

etc

All good performances undeniably

 

[Deleted member 20415]

you literally name a few other movies she turns in good performances in.

One Hit Wonder is not the term you're looking for here. That's not her.

 

[SpaceWolf]

What the hell is it with the obsessive over-use of the term "hot take" around here?

 

[Inferno313]

mother! is fantastic

the haters be damned

 

[- J - D -]

Hell no.

 

[Skellig Gra]

You answered your own question: No

 

[Mairu]

GAF not liking someone doesn't make them a one hit wonder

 

[benicillin]

She was great in mother! and definitely not the reason audiences didn't connect with that film.

 

[cyba89]

no

 

[Shaanyboi]

Actress who works alot appears in both good and bad things. Crazy.

 

[Escape Goat]

You talk of counter arguments but I haven’t heard an argument.

 

[SeanC]

Mother may not have made massive bank but she was far from bad in it. She carried that movie across the finish line on her own shoulders.

 

[KodaRuss]

I have not seen Joy but I hear it is good and I haven't seen Mother!

I think she is pretty good in

Winter's Bone
American Hustle
Silver Linings Playbook
Probably just the first Hunger Games


So probably not OP. At least not for me.

 

[IlGialloMondadori]

No? Winter's Bone, Silver Linings Playbook, American Hustle, Mother (may have failed but it's great)

 

[Johndoey]

No. What are you even talking about?

Ignoring everything else; her performance in mother! was excellent.

 

[Chase17]

While it of course shouldn't be considered an end all be all, she does already have like four oscar nominations and isn't even 30.

 

[robotrock]

No, she's an actress who has appeared in good and bad films like most/all actors and actresses.

Joy was really dry and unpleasant to sit through, but I was immensely impressed with her acting in Silver Linings Playbook and I enjoyed her roles in the Hunger Games. She put in good effort in Passengers despite the off-putting plotline. She did well in Hunger Games.

Any plans to see Mother, max?

 

[Gigglepoo]

Imagine judging an actresses' career based on her performance in superhero movies.

 

[Ducarmel]

No, I think she is a good actor if she sticks to character roles she is inspired to do.

 

[HellforLeather]

Eh, you could make the argument that maybe there is another actress more deserving of being the "highest paid". But you asked for "one hit wonder" status, shes definitely not that.

 

[shnurgleton]

Hot take indeed

 

[maxcriden]

Posts #2-24 (including mine):

Correct answer:

 

[bud]

she was tremendous in winter's bone, but i can't really remember another great performance by her.

 

[Shadow Puppetry]

Do you even know what hot take means?

 

[HStallion]

I'll give her credit for making Chris Pratt seem like a decent actor in Passengers.

 

[Seesaw15]

I mean she's not a movie star in the sense that her name alone is big enough to make people see a film( only Tom Cruise and Denzel Washington really have that star power) but she's a really talented actress.

 

[billy beane]

Imagine judging an actresses' career based on her performance in superhero movies.

Most 2017 thing of all time.

 

[maxcriden]

Any plans to see Mother, max?

Nah, not an Aronofsky fan generally and what I've heard about it doesn't seem like my kind of movie. Mistake?

 

[DerekOfTheDykes]

Given persistent criticism about her performance as Mystique in the post-trilogy X-Men movies, the failure of Mother! and the mixed reception of Passengers, is it safe to say that the "highest paid actress in Hollywood" has just been coasting on Hunger Games heat this whole time?

But the problems with Mother! and Passengers have nothing to do with her acting. Passengers centers around an interesting story concept that is presented in a problematic way due to the editing choices and the way the film ended (plenty of people have proposed a handful of much better endings that don't "redeem" Chris Pratt's character so much as put it in a better emotional context). Meanwhile, Mother! seems to be doing pretty well among critics, but in true Aronofsky fashion is basically a huge punch in the gut to the viewer so it's scaring away audiences.

If anything I think it's interesting that Lawrence should somehow be to blame for those two films.

Nah, not an Aronofsky fan generally and what I've heard about it doesn't seem like my kind of movie. Mistake?

My understanding is that if you couldn't do Requiem for a Dream don't do this one. Different subject matter, same basic concept of being very difficult to watch.

Or at least, that's what I gather, I haven't had a good opportunity to see it yet but I've listened cautiously to a lot of the discussions about it.

 

[blackflag]

? She’s great in anything besides X Men. She’s talented.

Silver Linings
Joy
American Hustle

etc

All good performances undeniably

Winter's Bone

She's a great actress just not great in X-men or hunger games but look at the source material.. it's not her fault.

 

[Ogodei]

Imagine judging an actresses' career based on her performance in superhero movies.

If it were just X-Men this wouldn't be a conversation, definitely. But it's been a few high-profile underperformances lately, though the consensus here seems to be that it's more bad luck on her part for signing onto questionable projects?

 

[Socreges]

Passengers was so mediocre. But she was good in it

 

[- J - D -]

She's 27 yrs old and already has 1 oscar win and 4 nominations. Was a lead in two mega blockbuster franchises, makes like $20+ million a feature, and just had a movie come out wherein she's praised as arguably the best thing in it.

What?

 

[Brakke]

She’s good at acting but she’s bad at careering as an actress.

 

[Nafai1123]

Nah, she was fantastic in Mother!

 

[cartographer]

Imagine judging an actresses' career based on her performance in superhero movies.

Only nerd movies exist. That's why Lawrence and Natalie Portman are rightfully considered the worst actresses of all time.

 

[PeskyToaster]

All she did was commit the cardinal sin of not giving a shit about the X-men. GASP

 

[Fried Food]

Great in Mother

 

[Jeffolation]

I'm no fan but mother! was great. She does a flick of that caliber every few years and she's a-ok in my book.

 

[And_Gignac]

No.

Her acting in Mother was AMAZING during the first half. Op lost, Lawrance WON.

 

[nachum00]

Honestly she hasn't wowed me in anything I've seen her in. As for Mother, she was easily the weakest link performance-wise.

 

[HomerSimpson-Man]

She's an actress who has a lot of roles in movies good and bad, blockbusters and disappointments, and when she is really good she even gets award nominations for her performances.

It would really go against the term one hit wonder.

 

[maxcriden]

If it were just X-Men this wouldn't be a conversation, definitely. But it's been a few high-profile underperformances lately, though the consensus here seems to be that it's more bad luck on her part for signing onto questionable projects?

Yep, I'd say it's definitely bad luck for signing onto these projects. I've not seen reviewers generally knock against her acting really. These are underperformances for the movies but not for her acting herself.

(And no disrespect intended with my .gif reply above, just thought it too apropos to not post.)

My understanding is that if you couldn't do Requiem for a Dream don't do this one. Different subject matter, same basic concept of being very difficult to watch.

Or at least, that's what I gather, I haven't had a good opportunity to see it yet but I've listened cautiously to a lot of the discussions about it.

Thanks - I definitely couldn't do Requiem so I'm glad to hear I was correct in thinking this wasn't for me.

 

[djplaeskool]

No.
If this question is mother! related, her performance in that was amazing.

 

[El Topo]

"Hey GAF, is this actress that has been nominated for four academy awards, has headlined multiple successful franchises and movies a one-hit wonder?"

Come on OP.

 

[Vestal]

I mean she's not a movie star in the sense that her name alone is big enough to make people see a film( only Tome Cruise and Denzel Washington really have that star power) but she's a really talented actress.

Thats a short list you got there.. Leo, Hanks, Crowe, The Rock to name a few also have that type of star power.

 

[It's Reyn Time!]

She’s fine, that’s all. She’s not bad, she’s not amazing. Just fine.

What the hell is it with the obsessive over-use of the term "hot take" around here?

I’ll see your hatred of ‘hot take’ and raise you a ‘is this the hill you want to die on?!’.