Maninthemirror
Banned
So I am at episode 3 and I see now that
Frank has reached the pinnacle of power and now he doesn't know how to handle it . His motivation Has dwindled somewhat
Honestly I'm surprised at people's reaction's to Claire. (All season spoilers)If you pay attention to her body language, she is constantly disappointed in the decisions that Frank makes. When he makes her shutdown her non-profit, she gives in. Giving up her position as ambassador. She is constantly compromising for him and it never works in her favor. I honestly did not like her until this season. My two favorite parts of the season were her arguments with Frank. When he says that he never should have made her ambassador she responds she never should have made him president. Agh that was so satisfying. And then she leaves him?!
I guess I just like seeing Frank suffer because I hate him. And Claire gives me that and more since she's the only one in the show that seems to be able to do that.
Can you imagine? The conversation around this viewing window would be massive, almost unbearable. Fans would feel compelled to catch up every night, so as to be involved in tomorrow’s discussion. And if you missed a day or two, catching up would be painless.
A resurrected, reconfigured schedule — modelled on the miniseries, but contemporized for real-time culture — would unleash the potential for conversation.
So I was reading this: How Netflix Broke The Unbreakable, about how the Netflix release-everything-at-once model fucks up talking about television. Couldn't help but think of this thread. Is this thread going to get some more steam when the spoiler window expires in a couple days? I wasn't around for the Season 2 thread so I don't have a good sense for if that happened then.
As it is, this thread's pretty limp / inactive considering we're looking at big name, popular, prestige-ish show. I guess part of the problem here is people don't come in to talk until they finish the whole thing (or, if they do come around, they don't stick around). Then, once you've finished the thing, there's no excitement in talking about Episode 3 or whatever because anything it put up in the air has hit the ground by the end of the season. So we don't get any wild speculation from episode to episode and we barely even get discussion outside anything but full-season impressions or focus on a couple events with season-defining significance.
I like that article's idea, to marathon the thing instead of binge it. Would people be interested in creating an artificial release schedule?
https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/1200/1*jrFsQJpUF_4pvIjgNqHjSQ.jpeg
The ship's sailed on this season I guess but is that idea, generally, something people would be down for next season / in similar situations going forward?
(shout out to Vermillion for giving digging in on something specific a go over here; anti-shoutout everyone who complained about it.)
Claire all season spoilers;Honestly I'm surprised at people's reaction's to Claire. (All season spoilers)If you pay attention to her body language, she is constantly disappointed in the decisions that Frank makes. When he makes her shutdown her non-profit, she gives in. Giving up her position as ambassador. She is constantly compromising for him and it never works in her favor. I honestly did not like her until this season. My two favorite parts of the season were her arguments with Frank. When he says that he never should have made her ambassador she responds she never should have made him president. Agh that was so satisfying. And then she leaves him?!
I guess I just like seeing Frank suffer because I hate him. And Claire gives me that and more since she's the only one in the show that seems to be able to do that.
In this debut episode of On House of Cards, Brooke Gladstone dissects the first episode of the third season with the creator and executive producer of House of Cards, Beau Willimon, and chief national correspondent for New York Times Magazine, Mark Leibovich.
This is a pretty typical amount of action for a binge watching show. Initial seasons tend to be more active, but I'm not surprised with the lack of posts in this thread. There isn't a good solution for generating discussion that I know of, and the threads tend to be much less active because of it.So I was reading this: How Netflix Broke The Unbreakable, about how the Netflix release-everything-at-once model fucks up talking about television. Couldn't help but think of this thread. Is this thread going to get some more steam when the spoiler window expires in a couple days? I wasn't around for the Season 2 thread so I don't have a good sense for if that happened then.
We've done this before a couple of times for rewatching shows, and they haven't garnered a ton of interest. I think it's an interesting idea, but unless the release is metered on the provider's end, I doubt many people have the patience to wait. Worth a shot, under the right circumstances, though.I like that article's idea, to marathon the thing instead of binge it. Would people be interested in creating an artificial release schedule?
I think part of the reason people who haven't finished stay away is that despite the spoiler tag instruction, people still post in tagged spoilers (for example, like you did above. )So I was reading this: How Netflix Broke The Unbreakable, about how the Netflix release-everything-at-once model fucks up talking about television. Couldn't help but think of this thread. Is this thread going to get some more steam when the spoiler window expires in a couple days? I wasn't around for the Season 2 thread so I don't have a good sense for if that happened then.
As it is, this thread's pretty limp / inactive considering we're looking at big name, popular, prestige-ish show. I guess part of the problem here is people don't come in to talk until they finish the whole thing (or, if they do come around, they don't stick around). Then, once you've finished the thing, there's no excitement in talking about Episode 3 or whatever because anything it put up in the air has hit the ground by the end of the season. So we don't get any wild speculation from episode to episode and we barely even get discussion outside anything but full-season impressions or focus on a couple events with season-defining significance.
I like that article's idea, to marathon the thing instead of binge it. Would people be interested in creating an artificial release schedule?
https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/1200/1*jrFsQJpUF_4pvIjgNqHjSQ.jpeg
The ship's sailed on this season I guess but is that idea, generally, something people would be down for next season / in similar situations going forward?
(shout out to Vermillion for giving digging in on something specific a go over here; anti-shoutout everyone who complained about it.)
Michael Kelly deserves best supporting actor. His arc throughout the season was by far the most fascinating.
I think part of the reason people who haven't finished stay away is that despite the spoiler tag instruction, people still post in tagged spoilers (for example, like you did above. )
Wait what do you think is a spoiler? Doug being alive is like the second scene! That's not a spoiler that's a premise.
Yeah, your post really wasn't as bad as others I've seen. And yes, the thing that stood out to me was the (Episode 1 spoiler)Wait what do you think is a spoiler?
So I was reading this: How Netflix Broke The Unbreakable, about how the Netflix release-everything-at-once model fucks up talking about television. Couldn't help but think of this thread. Is this thread going to get some more steam when the spoiler window expires in a couple days? I wasn't around for the Season 2 thread so I don't have a good sense for if that happened then.
As it is, this thread's pretty limp / inactive considering we're looking at big name, popular, prestige-ish show. I guess part of the problem here is people don't come in to talk until they finish the whole thing (or, if they do come around, they don't stick around). Then, once you've finished the thing, there's no excitement in talking about Episode 3 or whatever because anything it put up in the air has hit the ground by the end of the season. So we don't get any wild speculation from episode to episode and we barely even get discussion outside anything but full-season impressions or focus on a couple events with season-defining significance.
This is a pretty typical amount of action for a binge watching show. <snip>
I don't think this thread is particularly "limp" or inactive for what it is. In fact, it seems on par with the sort of discussion which I think can be expected from a thread about the third season of a character driven political drama which many people feel has been declining with each season. <snip>
Yeah, your post really wasn't as bad as others I've seen. And yes, the thing that stood out to me was the (Episode 1 spoiler)thing.Doug being alive
Of course, you could argue that anyone coming into this thread without having seen the first episode is basically okay with things getting spoiled and that my use of spoilers in this very post is a bit ridiculous.
Just finished!
Why is everyone leaving Frank?
Claire leaving still doesn't really make much sense.
I mean they addressed why her character is the way she is. Just comes kinda outta the blue.
It kinda ruins what came before, and her character.
Easily the weakest season. Still had some great stuff. It needs more of Kevin Spacey giving those dark sardonic monologues to the screen off to the side. They've kinda dropped that gimmick, but its the best part.
I think Claire's motivations have been very well built up to by the past few seasons; albeit admittedly not in a way that easily allows the audience to see her emotions internally. The successive strings ofis very strong reasoning as to why her character makes the decisions she makes....and that's not even mentioning that ****BBC VERSION SPOILERS****failures in her career due to Frank's actions and she begrudgingly allowing herself to be consistently stepped on by Francis for his needsit follows that Claire is ultimately the one who takes down Francis.
Not sure I understand why it's hard to really engage - you can talk about anything you want - just use spoiler tags and note which episode the spoiler is about. Or is the concern that you have a hard time figuring out what is / isn't a spoiler?Hmm interesting. My perspective is also maybe skewed by the fact that I was banned the weekend the thing released. But even if I hadn't been, I probably wouldn't have participated in the thread because of the spoiler policy. Hard to really engage if people don't have a common ground of things they're "allowed" to talk about.
<snip>
But yeah. Doug being in every episode of this season sort of outweighs *maybe* thinking he's dead for like three minutes of the first episode.
As it's now been two weeks since the release, spoiler tags are no longer needed for discussing any and all of Season 3. Thanks for your patience and diligence in using tags until now, and enjoy the conversation.
Man, I finished up at just the right time, then.
I was really, really enjoying this season...until that fucking sudden ending. The prior two seasons seemed to end at a good breaking point. This one leaves too many questions unanswered. "So, is Frank going to win the primary? Does he go to NH alone? What is Claire going to do? What are Remy and Jackie going to do? Join up with Dunbar?"
I did not know that about the first two seasons. That makes things a bit clearer.That's probably the show was ordered as a two-season package from the start, so the S2 finale was written as a potential series finale.
I don't mind them leaving as many balls in the air with this year's finale as they did because I assume/hope it's building up to S4 as the final season. Though I think tying off the Doug/Rachel subplot is a pretty big act of closure, and one that was actually left totally open-ended last year (is Doug dead or not? where's Rachel going to run to? etc.).
Just finished it last night.
What a depressing season.
Claire wtf?
I have no idea what is going on with her. She's upset with Frank because she is the one constantly failing? and ends up jeopardizing the entire world?! Takes it out on frank.
As an ambassador she was a complete and utter failure, and the only times she succeeded in winning was win she had to call in air support from frank (sending the 5000 troops in).
Clearly she wasn't happy, but man it is super selfish of her to leave at that time.
That said, Frank was a huge Dick. Had he used just an ounce of tact in the oval, during the argument, things would have turned out alittle different.
Season 2 was definitely better.
Worst HoC season yet. I rank them 1 > 2 > 3... Frank becoming president was the worst plot move they could possibly have come up with. The show was better with him being a scrappy congressman in the congressional leadership.
They cut out a lot of what made the show good because Netflix appeared reluctant to make "The president of the united states" appear to be too much of a total scum bag. But they already told us in S1 and S2 that Frank is a total scumbag so I don't get it...
And S3 really missed Doug. He was like one of the best characters on the previous seasons.
If S4 doesn't pick up fairly quickly I may drop it.
This season was 90% filler, especially considering how Doug, Rachel, and Gavin's character all turn out. Loved the acting by Stamper but the whole arc could not have been more transparent in its purpose as simply wheel spinning by the writers. The fact that the main plots of the season were not well tied together or satisfying either just made it even more apparent as a time burner.
Doug you bastard. Nice heel turn after all the redemption head faking with his bro and everything.
I wish he hadn't been in the car when he changed his mind. Could've literally turned on his heel. Made a metaphor of it. Woulda been deep.
They cut out a lot of what made the show good because Netflix appeared reluctant to make "The president of the united states" appear to be too much of a total scum bag. But they already told us in S1 and S2 that Frank is a total scumbag so I don't get it...
Frank becoming president was the worst plot move they could possibly have come up with. The show was better with him being a scrappy congressman in the congressional leadership.
[citation needed]
If true then that explains a lot. Every aspect of the show felt toned down, especially Underwood, and even the political maneuverings. Maybe viewers were demanding something easier to follow?
But that's the entire point of the show. This show is a remake of a British show with the same name where the equivalent happens. If he stayed a congressman, it wouldn't be House of Cards.