Why would they reuse the same plot from before...AND as a cliffhanger? Didn't Claire already leave Francis once for that artist guy.
She just had a discreet affair on the side. She never left him in the sense of "this marriage is bullshit, I'm out."
House of Cards creator Beau Willimon knows season 3 is polarizing: 'That’s a good thing'
^ Interesting article. I'm inclined to agree that it was weaker than the other two, but I still really enjoyed it. First two seasons were about the ascent to power, and this one is more about delving into the characters.
I'm not sure what to think of this season...Here are some random thoughts:
It definitely feels like they are trying to extend the show for as long as possible, at least based on how much actually happened from the beginning of the season to the end which was not much in terms of the actual presidential election or even the primaries. Also, it felt like certain things weren't fully explained and characters would almost kind of just disappear. I don't know what it was, but it just felt jarring to me. Furthermore, to compare this to Breaking Bad as far as protagonists who are evil, Breaking Bad felt like there was some type of beginning, middle, and end planned out (even if it wasn't necessarily). BB was able to balance the plot with character development and not have one or just the other. With House of Cards (this season especially) it just feels like the writers don't know where to go. Frank Underwood, at times, just has events within the story that don't even seem that connected serve to bring him up or down based on the writers' needs whereas Breaking Bad made it feel like Walter White's actions had real consequences. I also think having Claire go up against Frank (or at least leave him at this point) is rather stupid. I think it's far more interesting to have these two view the relationship as the key to getting power and that both of them need each other for it. They could have even implied that Frank and Claire may plan to bring Claire into such a place as to run for President when Frank's presidency ultimately ends (either he runs it out or he doesn't win). With that said, while the writing felt mediocre sometimes, the acting from Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright was awesome as always. I felt that Doug had personally run his course, and I felt that his storyline, Gavin's, Rachael's, and Tom's weren't really needed. It brought the plot out of focus.
EDIT:Apparently Mendoza's actor left the show? That explains a lot. He was a good foil for Frank, so I felt that it really hurt this season. What was the reason the show gave for Mendoza not appearing anymore? I know Frank said it to the screen, but it was just surprising for a major character to suddenly disappear like that with one line from Frank explaining such.
On the actor leaving:
Did Mendoza's actor just up and leave midway through filming? Was it known that he was going to leave while they were filming? The way they wrote him off in a literal "oh hey where's this guy?" "oh stuff happened, lets never mention him again" way seems like the dude dropped the news to the producers and threw the deuces up the next day.
Lars Mikkelsen, very good in Forbrydelsen.
Any relation to Mads Mikkelsen? (Le Chiffre/Hannibal)
The answer is in this article:
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2...sode-8-recap-the-story-of-the-hurricane/?_r=0
So bizarre. How was he not under contract to complete filming for the entire season? Or did they write him off prior to the season even beginning filming? Why not just completely recast him?
Brother!
Oh, I will say to the show's credit thatthe confrontation in the Oval Office between Frank and Claire was really chilling. Spacey killed it.
Doug just doesn't make any sense to me. I get why Frank and Claire do the awful things they do but what does Doug get from it?They had literally tossed him out after his "accident" so why is he still so loyal to them? He isn't getting anything tangible from this relationship that I can see.
Also, my ideal plot for the next season would have beenfor Frank to run with Claire as his running mate, then they win, and she has him assassinated and becomes our first female president. Of course that can't happen since he's already given her a political appointment and she failed but that could have been interesting.
finished the season.. Enjoyed it.. Am I the only one who thinks Stamper didn't kill Rachel? I mean the way the scenes were edited.. Never really showing her face while being buried either..
In regards to dougI don't think they threw him aside, weather his motivations were selfish or not, Frank was trying to help doug recover before bringing him back in. I think the proof of that is how angry he got at Dunbar for letting him work when he wasn't sober yet
Nah, she's dead. There's really no other way to interpret that. Do you think he killed a Rachel lookalike and buried her in the desert?
Finished the season last night.
They should've killed Rachel off in that cold opening. Would've been far more effective IMO than dragging that out for the entire damn episode, when it was obvious that Doug was going to kill her as soon as he found out that she was still alive.
It really would've been better if they'd introduced some scheme of the Underwoods to unseat Mendoza. I mean, the justification for it was right there in the first episode, when Mendoza completely wrecked Claire's nomination to the UN.
By the end of the season I had had it up to here with this stupid song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_pIpBeYlqk
Also...the way Rachel was killed was dumb. He was going to let her go then he changed his mind and boom, she's being buried. Makes no sense.