hydrophilic attack
Member
ur mother
How is it possible that OT is asking such a question? There is obviously only one way how the DNA got into our shared DNA pool. Fucking fucking and fucking.
So what you're saying is some early homo sapiens guys were getting cucked by neanderthal dudes. I can just see the greentext caveposting now...
kidnapping and rape. plain and simple.
sapiens are animals. animals purpose in life is to survive and procreate. willing or unwilling. it is innate.
Rape most likely.
🤔I wouldn't be surprised if we had a % of horse DNA
I wouldn't be surprised if we had a % of horse DNA
There's no reason to assume that. Like I said, the problem lies in the assumption that Neanderthals were either less intelligent or less developed than Sapiens at the time they lived together.
This is the reason why the most common answer in this thread is "rape." Because people are holding onto a Hollywood stereotype that Neanderthals = Cavemen or that they looked a lot closer to apes.
I think everyone on GAF has 4% horse DNA.
yeah. in the pants.
Man, can you imagine the racism if Neanderthals were still alive?
We have extreme racism in our own species, I can't even begin to imagine the racism that would exist between two intelligent human species.
tl;dr at the bottom.
Something that really pisses me off is that very early reconstructions of Neanderthals were racist. I remember this one reconstruction of what looked a really hairy black man, and there may have been worse ones; I don't know if this was before or after it was discovered how much bigger their cranial capacities were or just from the assumptions of how Erectus or other African homo species looked, but Neanderthals were pale - modern reconstructions are much different.
And that's just the thing, those who are of purely African descent, are the purest homo sapiens alive. And that makes sense, because it is believed that man originated in Ethiopa right? So if you're 100% black, you are 100% homo sapiens. Almost the rest of the world have at least 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. So I just wonder, it's just such a beautiful, charming, alluring, and ultimately fascinating thing to think about.
Yeesh.....
Man, pure Africans lucked out on that one.
I thought interspecies relations resulted in sterile offspring
I actually wonder if Neanderthals were smarter than modern humans.
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans (with 0% Neanderthal DNA) had never developed their system of writing, or large scaled cities despite thousands of years of contact with the middle eastern region, which was the cradle of earliest civilization. This kind of view can be labeled as racism. That's why I don't want to talk about it except in actual Neanderthal discussion.
We was clapping neanderthal cheeks
When everything smells awful, everything probably smells normal.The smell must've been horrible. How did people smash back then....
They were not. There were no artifact excavated from the Neanderthal sites you can qualify as art or religious. Even in the same cave that carried both Neanderthal and modern human artifacts, the human ones were much more "spiritual."
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans (with 0% Neanderthal DNA) had never developed their system of writing, or large scaled cities despite thousands of years of contact with the middle eastern region, which was the cradle of earliest civilization. This kind of view can be labeled as racism. That's why I don't want to talk about it except in actual Neanderthal discussion.
LOL. Prepare to be skewered.
They were not. There were no artifact excavated from the Neanderthal sites you can qualify as art or religious. Even in the same cave that carried both Neanderthal and modern human artifacts, the human ones were much more "spiritual."
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans (with 0% Neanderthal DNA) had never developed their system of writing, or large scaled cities despite thousands of years of contact with the middle eastern region, which was the cradle of earliest civilization. This kind of view can be labeled as racism. That's why I don't want to talk about it except in actual Neanderthal discussion.
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans
Yea, I'm out of this thread.They were not. There were no artifact excavated from the Neanderthal sites you can qualify as art or religious. Even in the same cave that carried both Neanderthal and modern human artifacts, the human ones were much more "spiritual."
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans (with 0% Neanderthal DNA) had never developed their system of writing, or large scaled cities despite thousands of years of contact with the middle eastern region, which was the cradle of earliest civilization. This kind of view can be labeled as racism. That's why I don't want to talk about it except in actual Neanderthal discussion.
They were not. There were no artifact excavated from the Neanderthal sites you can qualify as art or religious. Even in the same cave that carried both Neanderthal and modern human artifacts, the human ones were much more "spiritual."
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans (with 0% Neanderthal DNA) had never developed their system of writing, or large scaled cities despite thousands of years of contact with the middle eastern region, which was the cradle of earliest civilization. This kind of view can be labeled as racism. That's why I don't want to talk about it except in actual Neanderthal discussion.
They were not. There were no artifact excavated from the Neanderthal sites you can qualify as art or religious. Even in the same cave that carried both Neanderthal and modern human artifacts, the human ones were much more "spiritual."
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans (with 0% Neanderthal DNA) had never developed their system of writing, or large scaled cities despite thousands of years of contact with the middle eastern region, which was the cradle of earliest civilization. This kind of view can be labeled as racism. That's why I don't want to talk about it except in actual Neanderthal discussion.
They were not. There were no artifact excavated from the Neanderthal sites you can qualify as art or religious. Even in the same cave that carried both Neanderthal and modern human artifacts, the human ones were much more "spiritual."
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans (with 0% Neanderthal DNA) had never developed their system of writing, or large scaled cities despite thousands of years of contact with the middle eastern region, which was the cradle of earliest civilization. This kind of view can be labeled as racism. That's why I don't want to talk about it except in actual Neanderthal discussion.
I actually wonder if Neanderthals were smarter than modern humans.
We'll never know. But survival of the fittest doesn't always mean survival of the smartest.
However I have a pet theory that modern human mixing with a little bit of Neanderthal DNA give human a little extra intellectual boost. My reasoning is that Africans (with 0% Neanderthal DNA) had never developed their system of writing, or large scaled cities despite thousands of years of contact with the middle eastern region, which was the cradle of earliest civilization. This kind of view can be labeled as racism. That's why I don't want to talk about it except in actual Neanderthal discussion.
The smell must've been horrible. How did people smash back then....
We weren't that different allowing a low success rate of compatible genes to mix. This probably happened all the time. It's not like bam we were modern humans. It's not creationism.
Creationism: God made mermaids
Evolution: ancient hominids fucked fish and their offspring evolved into mermaids
these are the only two options, mermaids definitely exist I just proved it