• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

How Greed Destroyed Xbox

As if Sony never reaised the prices of their consoles 5 years later, raised their subscription twice so far since the release of PS5, Switch 2 raising their prices of accessories 10 days before console release etc. This whole generation is GREED.
300px-We_Don%27t_Do_That_Here.jpg
 
The problem is they quit competing with high quality games. It's like that leaked email about the meeting where they said they cant' compete with TLOU.
They're not doing what needs to happen to compete with high end games, so they're trying to do mediocre games to keep a subscription base sated.
Phil has to go cause he convinced himself making AAA bangers "won't move the needle" cause they lost the "worst generation to lose".

That's loser mentality. Nintendo never let you keep your digital library and they were always fine, cause they would just keep making system seller games.
All they need is consistent system seller games, and even their leader is telling them to not even bother trying.
Nailed it. Grounded and sea of thieves were good games, imo.
 


Probably one of the best recent examples summarizing in as concise a way as possible how Xbox lost its way, starting with the late 360 era and beyond.


Because why not have one more Xbox thread on here?


FFS, I couldn't watch even 10 seconds of that, because of this voice.
Did someone hit him in the balls?
 
I'd rather play Cyberpunk 2077 on an XB1 for 20 hours straight than listen to this clown for more than 20 seconds.
 
My friend, even you have to admit that $799 for a Series X is some unmatched greed especially when a PS5 Pro is less expensive than it. A moment where MS should have got more aggressive in pricing to compete they chose to be more expensive than the competition. Not even AMD is that greedy/stupid. Same with $80 games or $30 per month for gamepass. If you watch the vid thats the price of 5 AAA games at full price in a year. Who would rent a MS picked list of games instead of buying and owning 5 full price $70 games they pick themselves every year? or even more if they buy games on sale.

I don't know if it's 100% greed though (Some of it is). I think Xbox just no longer has any wiggle room. Over the last 5 years they have spent crazy money on acquisitions and Game Pass, now papa MS wants what they were sold on by the Xbox division.
 
Last edited:
its beating a fossil horse at this point i guess,
but no lies detected, I'd probably put stupidity above greed.

these idiots really believed that there can be a "netflix of gaming" with 100s of millions subscribers and bet the whole division on that pipedream.

everything else, (shopping spree to keep up content slop -> eye of ms bookkeeping sauron -> missing targets (because duh its not sustainable) -> going full 3rd party to make up -> collapsing hw sales because of that -> which suprise-suprise craters gamepass subs, because they were mostly console players)
were just panic pivots that sealed the death spiral.

once a.i bubble bursts ms will have zero tolerance for this much incompetency. they are already getting hammered, while mothership was breaking records.

i expect within 5 years they'll leave hw completely after their $2k pc-console hybrid sells hundred units each month,
close most of the studios they gobbled up, because they keep vomitting mediocre flops
and be reduced to being activision cod factory.

at least spencer n co. can ride this shipwreck until retirement i guess.
 
Last edited:
Businesses are SUPPOSED to be greedy. If the CEO of it isn't, then he's not a good CEO.

Xbox failed because they failed for bad business practices and not having a product people wanted enough to justify those business practices.
 
It's worth studying how executives with money and almost unlimited investment have screwed up Xbox so badly and still remain in their positions.
 
It was not greed, it was the corpos suits smelling money.

Xbox and the 360 where powered by people that cares and likes game. Now we have people that are only here because it was easier to get the bonus and make money. Yes they will talk about how Games changes lives and they will take pictures with towers of games they never played

But they don't care, they never did

That's why they just transform Halo into a trend chaser "hey, we also have something like CoD! Just do what they did", or the awful XOne "This new console will let you play all your media, TV shows and more! Games? O yeah… that too", or the super GamePass "it is Netflix, but for games. Just put more slop in it. It is quantity not quality"

Games are not your average product, they not only can be easily skipped if they are bad (we don't need them to live) we also can just play older version of games. But they cant comprehend this, because they dont play games, they dont understand that you can just dust off your OG Xbox or your 360 and play better version of their slop.
 
My friend, even you have to admit that $799 for a Series X is some unmatched greed especially when a PS5 Pro is less expensive than it. A moment where MS should have got more aggressive in pricing to compete they chose to be more expensive than the competition. Not even AMD is that greedy/stupid. Same with $80 games or $30 per month for gamepass. If you watch the vid thats the price of 5 AAA games at full price in a year. Who would rent a MS picked list of games instead of buying and owning 5 full price $70 games they pick themselves every year? or even more if they buy games on sale.
So because their price hike overall is a larger sum, we just gonna ignore Sony did the same exact thing? I have both PS5 and XsX, last I remember is I bout my xbox for normal price, havent followed up what they are now new. But my point is, its not just Microsoft, they all are tripple dipping this generation, Nintendo getting into the $90 territory lol. SONY's subscription got so out of hand I just opted out after years of paying since PS3. MS gamepass made sense for $14, now it doesnt make sense. They are ALL guilty of this, lets not single out MS as some bad guy when the other two are equally bad.
 
My friend, even you have to admit that $799 for a Series X is some unmatched greed especially when a PS5 Pro is less expensive than it. A moment where MS should have got more aggressive in pricing to compete they chose to be more expensive than the competition. Not even AMD is that greedy/stupid. Same with $80 games or $30 per month for gamepass. If you watch the vid thats the price of 5 AAA games at full price in a year. Who would rent a MS picked list of games instead of buying and owning 5 full price $70 games they pick themselves every year? or even more if they buy games on sale.
Microsoft knows that they aren't selling many Series X consoles at $800. But they also weren't selling many at $500, so the bean counters probably decided to stop subsidizing it. I agree that they could have been aggressive at pricing if they wanted to sell more consoles, but it's clear that they would rather sell games on PS5 for a profit than sell consoles at a loss. So I don't think their console pricing is greed. It's more likely a condition of higher component prices because they aren't able to get volume discounts and the fact that they are multi-platform now.
 
A PlaySation.


No Way GIF




We just wanted them to support their devs and keep the games exclusive. but hey, as long as magnus lets me play my steam games aswell as my xbox ones, Im good. Im only missing out if I dont buy a switch 2. besides...symetrical analog sticks layouts are terrible.
 
I couldn't believe it when I saw a front page Slickdeal, Xbox Series X for over $600 with a $100 gift card, what the actual F?
Nothing says giving up more like an unrealistic price hike.
 
Id say a mixture of both.
Most of humans are greedy, our greed is what is pushing us to be better/more succesful/productable etc, its our motivation, u think all those top class surgeons/actors/politicans/ceos struggle for long years and often decades just for the hell of it- they do it coz they are greedy for money/success/status/bitches etc.

Take away greed from humans and our tech progress stops right away, hell we will actually regress coz there wont be motivation to strive for greatness anymore :messenger_astonished:
 
100%. I couldn't believe their mentality on TLOU. They had made Gears and Halo so it's not like the concept of a killer app was foreign to them at all. All they had to do was find/create the next IP that was on that level but they just folded.

Imagine how different things could've been if they had just invested 0.5B in 2-3 system sellers early on (2014-15). If they had games to counter UC4, Horizon, and GOW maybe Sony doesn't gain such a massive hardware advantage and so MS doesn't buy Activision nor Bethesda. MS maybe could've saved themselves 75B had they spent more money early enough.


possibly down to change in management? when halo and gears were at their peak in the X360 era they had people like jay allard and peter moore running things. once the likes of mattrick, and spencer and now sarah bond started running things it became a shit show over time. by the time the Xb1 launched ...well we all know how that went....


I cant help but wonder how different things could have been for xbox had they just released it without kinect and instead spent that money on ensuring they had the more powerful console at launch and some strong exclusives, push for digital and BC all the same but without all the DRM language..... they would have been so much better off. all those aquisitions, they made would have been a steady stream of exclusives and now they have given that advantage away. Its been a bit like watching your fave football team buy a bunch of elite players but score own goals. they have all the tools and resources and talent in those studios, to be industry leader but lack the leadership to execute the concepts properly.
 
No, it's not greed. It's stupidity, incompetence, arrogance from those who controlled and control Xbox...

They were never competent, they just had luck.

The Xbox 360 was luck, plain and simple.

Microsoft's luck ran out and Xbox never succeeded again. Windows Phone, Bing, aQuantive, Zune; these, for example, never had luck.
The success of the Xbox 360 was never about its own merits but rather the disastrous reveal and launch of the PS3 which Xbox greatly capitalized on--until the RROD came home to roost anyway, allowing Sony the breathing room it needed to recover.
 
We'll see what Xbox looks like a year from now, I think its tweaks than an overhaul, right now we're in the price hike chapter plus their exclusives (gears 5, infinite, Forza reboot) stink.
 
The Xbox 360 was luck, plain and simple.
So when Sony make a good console that is powerful, affordable, and easy to develop for such as the PS1, it's because Sony are awesome and have a ton of merit.

But when Microsoft release a console that is powerful, affordable, easy to develop for with a 1 year head-start on top of it (which is remarkable), it's is only luck.
 
So when Sony make a good console that is powerful, affordable, and easy to develop for such as the PS1, it's because Sony are awesome and have a ton of merit.

But when Microsoft release a console that is powerful, affordable, easy to develop for with a 1 year head-start on top of it (which is remarkable), it's is only luck.
If you remember all the problems related to three red lights, the fact that we had version a x360 version with non harddrive, all the kinect push and the commercial result of every other xbox interation (and in fact, every other customer device by Microsoft if we apply a loose comparison), unfortunately, luck is not a bad word to describe x360 initial success.
 
If you remember all the problems related to three red lights, the fact that we had version a x360 version with non harddrive, all the kinect push and the commercial result of every other xbox interation (and in fact, every other customer device by Microsoft if we apply a loose comparison), unfortunately, luck is not a bad word to describe x360 initial success.
He says while earning trophies, talking in party chat, with his friends, and holding a round and wide controller. The 360 "core" was a budget model. Similar to Sony's B01 model. With no wifi and a 20gb HDD. The PS3 also had the YLOD. The RROD was not exclusive to Xbox. And effected all eletronics of that era. It's called bumpgate.
 
Last edited:
He says while earning trophies, talking in party chat, with his friends, and holding a round and wide controller. The 360 "core" was a budget model. Similar to Sony's B01 model. With no wifi and a 20gb HDD. The PS3 also had the YLOD. The RROD was not exclusive to Xbox. And effected all eletronics of that era. It's called bumpgate.
Only MS Zealots compare YLOD and RROD. The first one affected only a minimal fraction of PS3 if you compare with RROD (i remember i read that 20% of xboxes 360 were affected by RROS on the worst case scenario vs 0.5% or 1% of PS3s... [i'm not defending YLOD, but the comparison is wrong]). And dividing your audience with a version that cannot play games that requie HD is... I'm sorry to say, stupid. You just confirmed me that LUCK was the word to synthesize xbox 360 (and even that was thrown by MS after kinect...)
 
Xbox has failed because MS has never understood gamers as an audience.

They've just treated them like any other consumer group and fundamentally misread their wants and needs.
 
If you remember all the problems related to three red lights, the fact that we had version a x360 version with non harddrive, all the kinect push and the commercial result of every other xbox interation (and in fact, every other customer device by Microsoft if we apply a loose comparison), unfortunately, luck is not a bad word to describe x360 initial success.
The launch product, its qualities, its games etc... were not the fruit of luck. RROD was definitely a mistake. Kinect is a shift that occurred later. At that point, the 360 success was already achieved and it was not due to luck, but due to a great vision, product and partnerships starting from the launch.
 
The launch product, its qualities, its games etc... were not the fruit of luck. RROD was definitely a mistake. Kinect is a shift that occurred later. At that point, the 360 success was already achieved and it was not due to luck, but due to a great vision, product and partnerships starting from the launch.
Let's agree to disagree... because MS wasn't able to reproduce NONE of those qualities after xbox 360 (and even before that). Hence... luck 🙃
 
Last edited:
As if Sony never reaised the prices of their consoles 5 years later, raised their subscription twice so far since the release of PS5, Switch 2 raising their prices of accessories 10 days before console release etc. This whole generation is GREED.
I disagree.

These things you are saying don't affect me at all.

Xbox raising the price of the top tier to 30 bucks, locking day 1 games behind that, lying about having console exclusives for XSX before I bought one at launch, Xbox not being able to sell the console or having issues with keeping stock making me feel like a sucker for buying myself and my brother an XSX....these are the things that have affected me.

Nintendo raised the price? News to me. Sony raised the price? News to me. I bought them both day 1 and paid msrp. Xbox bait and switched me on XSX so who is the greedy one now?

I don't think any of them are greedy btw. I think Xbox is just inept and the other two aren't as inept. That could change but Xbox burned me this gen and many others so they are on the outs for at least 1 gen.
 
Last edited:
They remind me of a spoiled kid who's parents are rich and give their kid everything, but the kid has such a terrible attitude and behavior that they fail despite having the best of the best.
 
Im on board with the "luck" statements. Cause they sure as hell capitalized on that window of time Sony shot themselves.
Ultimately, they still ended up losing to PS3 by the time it was all said and done. Couldn't even seal the deal really and that was really the only opportunity they had and it was never replicated.

360 was my main console until PS3 came out. By then RROD was already a massive issue and i was on my second console and tons of free consolation prize games sent to me directly from them along with a new Hard Drive.

They didnt invest in games, they mostly rehashed the same series with some goodies in between. Now they are trying to convince us First party exclusives dont matter? lol

Without Microsofts backing and constant powerlevling- im not even sure the first Xbox makes it.
 
Last edited:
I disagree.

These things you are saying don't affect me at all.

Xbox raising the price of the top tier to 30 bucks, locking day 1 games behind that, lying about having console exclusives for XSX before I bought one at launch, Xbox not being able to sell the console or having issues with keeping stock making me feel like a sucker for buying myself and my brother an XSX....these are the things that have affected me.

Nintendo raised the price? News to me. Sony raised the price? News to me. I bought them both day 1 and paid msrp. Xbox bait and switched me on XSX so who is the greedy one now?

I don't think any of them are greedy btw. I think Xbox is just inept and the other two aren't as inept. That could change but Xbox burned me this gen and many others so they are on the outs for at least 1 gen.
Unless you live under a rock, PS5 raised their prices TWICE on subscription and in August on the console itself :




"In September 2023, Sony increased 12-month PlayStation Plus subscription prices by as much as 35% in some regions, with the Premium tier increasing from $119 / £99 per year to $159 / £119."

And Nintendo even before the Switch 2 released:

 
Unless you live under a rock, PS5 raised their prices TWICE on subscription and in August on the console itself :




"In September 2023, Sony increased 12-month PlayStation Plus subscription prices by as much as 35% in some regions, with the Premium tier increasing from $119 / £99 per year to $159 / £119."

And Nintendo even before the Switch 2 released:


Yep these companies trying to bleed us like a stone. Not a huge deal for me because honestly $159 a year isn't anything I even think about. My other hobby cost me that much a month. I calculated once and I've spent over $20,000 on that hobby now. I have been doing it for close to 10 years now though.

I've been fine having essential for most of the year and then switching to extra near the end and knocking out a few games on PS+extra.
 
Unless you live under a rock, PS5 raised their prices TWICE on subscription and in August on the console itself :




"In September 2023, Sony increased 12-month PlayStation Plus subscription prices by as much as 35% in some regions, with the Premium tier increasing from $119 / £99 per year to $159 / £119."

And Nintendo even before the Switch 2 released:

Yet PlayStation Plus' most expensive tier ($159) costs less than half of an equivalent year of Game Pass Ultimate ($360).…

Nintendo's most expensive option is $50 a year.
 
Last edited:
Let's agree to disagree... because MS wasn't able to reproduce NONE of those qualities after xbox 360 (and even before that). Hence... luck 🙃
This is some of the dumbest logic I have ever seen.

Because the situation was not reproduced later by some other leadership doesn't mean that it was luck for the OG and 360...
 
Last edited:
This is some of the dumbest logic I have ever seen.

Because the situation was not reproduced later by some other leadership doesn't mean that it was luck for the OG and 360...
Ill ignore you because you just proved you are exctremely dumb, sorry... "a great vision, product and partnerships starting from the launch." (your words, btw) is exactly what Sony did at least 2 or 3 times (PS1, PS2 and [loosely speaking] PS4)!
 
The problem is they quit competing with high quality games. It's like that leaked email about the meeting where they said they cant' compete with TLOU.
They're not doing what needs to happen to compete with high end games, so they're trying to do mediocre games to keep a subscription base sated.
Phil has to go cause he convinced himself making AAA bangers "won't move the needle" cause they lost the "worst generation to lose".

That's loser mentality. Nintendo never let you keep your digital library and they were always fine, cause they would just keep making system seller games.
All they need is consistent system seller games, and even their leader is telling them to not even bother trying.
100% agree, but I think Phil probably knows deep down they can't do it.. Might be loser mentality, but maybe they really are just not capable like PS. I think the problem with Xbox is the management of the business.. They are just not good, I think there is some deep rooted problems at senior level.
 
Greed is the number one evil in the world, followed by psychopathy and sociophathy in high positions (corporations and politics).
 
Ill ignore you because you just proved you are exctremely dumb, sorry... "a great vision, product and partnerships starting from the launch." (your words, btw) is exactly what Sony did at least 2 or 3 times (PS1, PS2 and [loosely speaking] PS4)!
Paulo Roberto, I suspect you have some comprehension issues. At which moment exactly did I say that Sony did not have any of this for their own consoles ?
 
Top Bottom