• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality (NYT Magazine)

entremet

Member
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/...s&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront&_r=0

Recently, Gary Cohn, the chief economic adviser to President Trump, heralded his boss’s first tax plan as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity to do something really big.” And indeed, Trump’s plan represents a radical transformation in how we will fund the government, with its biggest winners being corporations and wealthy families. But no one in his administration, and only a small (albeit growing) group of people in either party, is pushing to reform what may very well be the most regressive piece of social policy in America. Perhaps that’s because the mortgage-interest deduction overwhelmingly benefits the sorts of upper-middle-class voters who make up the donor base of both parties and who generally fail to acknowledge themselves to be beneficiaries of federal largess. “Today, as in the past,” writes the historian Molly Michelmore in her book “Tax and Spend,” “most of the recipients of federal aid are not the suspect ‘welfare queens’ of the popular imagination but rather middle-class homeowners, salaried professionals and retirees.” A 15-story public housing tower and a mortgaged suburban home are both government-subsidized, but only one looks (and feels) that way. It is only by recognizing this fact that we can begin to understand why there is so much poverty in the United States today.

When we think of entitlement programs, Social Security and Medicare immediately come to mind. But by any fair standard, the holy trinity of United States social policy should also include the mortgage-interest deduction — an enormous benefit that has also become politically untouchable.

The MID came into being in 1913, not to spur homeownership but simply as part of a general policy allowing businesses to deduct interest payments from loans. At that time, most Americans didn’t own their homes and only the rich paid income tax, so the effects of the mortgage deduction on the nation’s tax proceeds were fairly trivial. That began to change in the second half of the 20th century, though, because of two huge transformations in American life. First, income tax was converted from an elite tax to a mass tax: In 1932, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (precursor to the I.R.S.) processed fewer than two million individual tax returns, but 11 years later, it processed over 40 million. At the same time, the federal government began subsidizing homeownership through large-scale initiatives like the G.I. Bill and mortgage insurance. Homeownership grew rapidly in the postwar period, and so did the MID.

By the time policy makers realized how extravagant the MID had become, it was too late to do much about it without facing significant backlash. Millions of voters had begun to count on getting that money back. Even President Ronald Reagan, who oversaw drastic cuts to housing programs benefiting low-income Americans, let the MID be. Subsequent politicians followed suit, often eager to discuss reforms to Social Security and Medicare but reluctant to touch the MID, even as the program continued to grow more costly: By 2019, MID expenditures are expected to exceed $96 billion.

“Once we’re in a world with a MID,” says Todd Sinai, a professor of real estate and public policy at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, “it is very hard to get to a world without the MID.” That’s in part because the benefit helps to prop up home values. It’s impossible to say how much, but a widely cited 1996 study estimated that eliminating the MID and property-tax deductions would result in a 13 to 17 percent reduction in housing prices nationwide, though that estimate varies widely by region and more recent analyses have found smaller effects. The MID allows home buyers to collect more after-tax savings if they take on more mortgage debt, which incentivizes them to pay more for properties than they could have otherwise. By inflating home values, the MID benefits Americans who already own homes — and makes joining their ranks harder.

The owner-renter divide is as salient as any other in this nation, and this divide is a historical result of statecraft designed to protect and promote inequality. Ours was not always a nation of homeowners; the New Deal fashioned it so, particularly through the G.I. Bill of Rights. The G.I. Bill was enormous, consuming 15 percent of the federal budget in 1948, and remains unmatched by any other single social policy in the scope and depth of its provisions, which included things like college tuition benefits and small-business loans. The G.I. Bill brought a rollout of veterans’ mortgages, padded with modest interest rates and down payments waived for loans up to 30 years. Returning soldiers lined up and bought new homes by the millions. In the years immediately following World War II, veterans’ mortgages accounted for over 40 percent of all home loans.

Huge article at the link. Tons of history and research.
 

Schattenjäger

Gabriel Knight
MID is a deduction not a credit and it was designed to promote home ownership

Not sure what the author is getting at here
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/...s&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront&_r=0


15-story public housing tower and a mortgaged suburban home are both government-subsidized, but only one looks (and feels) that way. It is only by recognizing this fact that we can begin to understand why there is so much poverty in the United States today.

What does this mean? It could only look and feel different if you're a racist or playing dumb like you're not getting government assistance just like everybody else.
 

Zoe

Member
I thought there was an income ceiling to claiming the MID.

Edit: Just realized I was thinking of the PMI deduction
 

entremet

Member
Schattenjäger;236359212 said:
MID is a deduction not a credit and it was designed to promote home ownership

Not sure what the author is getting at here

Where does the author says it's a credit? The end goal is the same. And the advantages are the same.
 

Goro Majima

Kitty Genovese Member
Schattenjäger;236359212 said:
MID is a deduction not a credit and it was designed to promote home ownership

Not sure what the author is getting at here

Well it's an above the line deduction that lowers your AGI dollar for dollar so it's way better than most other deductions since it directly impacts your tax rate.

He seems to be arguing that the MID inflates the value of homes making it too expensive for less wealthy individuals to purchase a home. The article cites a 1996 study saying 13-17 percent price decrease if the MID is eliminated and then admits that newer studies show a reduced effect and that it may vary by region.

I'm a little defensive of the MID personally because to me it does encourage home ownership at best and may be neutral at worst. If the MID is eliminated, that favors cash buyers of homes even more so - which isn't going to be your average middle class individual. I'm also skeptical that home prices would drop if the MID was elminated since demand is still high in many areas.

Home ownership is the single best vehicle for the middle class to acquire wealth so if they do anything, just put an income limit on the MID.
 
Well it's an above the line deduction that lowers your AGI dollar for dollar so it's way better than most other deductions since it directly impacts your tax rate.

He seems to be arguing that the MID inflates the value of homes making it too expensive for less wealthy individuals to purchase a home. The article cites a 1996 study saying 13-17 percent price decrease if the MID is eliminated and then admits that newer studies show a reduced effect and that it may vary by region.

I'm a little defensive of the MID personally because to me it does encourage home ownership at best and may be neutral at worst. If the MID is eliminated, that favors cash buyers of homes even more so - which isn't going to be your average middle class individual. I'm also skeptical that home prices would drop if the MID was elminated since demand is still high in many areas.

Home ownership is the single best vehicle for the middle class to acquire wealth so if they do anything, just put an income limit on the MID.

MID appears on schedule A as an itemized deduction. I don't get what you mean by most other deductions. Student loan, HSA, IRA deduction, tutition & fees all go on page 1 of the 1040.

If Trump actually doubles the standard deduction, it's hard to gauge the impact on most middle class families and how it will be reducing their taxable income by more than what they were in the past if they were just taking property taxes / state taxes / MID.
 
Top Bottom