• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

How to Invest for Retirement

Slayer-33

Liverpool-2
Can I has your dividends gusys? (cat pic.jpg)

Is anyone in here trading stocks or just doing retirement account stuff?

If doing both, how tempted are ya to ignore retirement accounts in favor of all out trading?
 

PKrockin

Member
Once I put together a budget for once, I'm going to invest the $100,000 I've saved over the last 5 years into Vanguard US/Foreign total stock market funds in a regular account. No debt left besides a $130k mortgage. Hopefully, assuming 7% interest and regular, significantly less generous contributions (in case I can't find much work in the next few years, which is possible), I could retire by 40-50.

There's a definite fear that I'm going to screw myself over somehow by dumping all this money in at once, but it's my own fault for thinking that unless I was an expert with a lot of time on my hands I would just be gambling by investing in the stock market. I'm just lucky to have a fairly high paying job on average and be frugal by nature. A lot of my colleagues who are far better paid than I am are finding themselves poor and nervous after all the new cars, big houses, and all sorts of expensive toys.

I've skimmed through the vast majority of this thread now. Shout outs to piecake, randolph, ghaleon, tokkun, iamblades, cyan, and everyone else who has stuck around to teach and answer questions throughout the thread. Y'all deserve a round of high fives.
 

Darren870

Member
Can I has your dividends gusys? (cat pic.jpg)

Is anyone in here trading stocks or just doing retirement account stuff?

If doing both, how tempted are ya to ignore retirement accounts in favor of all out trading?

I do both. Retirement always comes first though. However, I don't max out everything.
 

simplayer

Member
Can I has your dividends gusys? (cat pic.jpg)

Is anyone in here trading stocks or just doing retirement account stuff?

If doing both, how tempted are ya to ignore retirement accounts in favor of all out trading?

I do both.

I max out my retirement accounts before I do non-tax advantaged stuff though.
 
besides dividend reinvestment does Vanguard also invest gains from your current holdings and does it happen on the same day?

Describe what you mean by "gains," as I could be missing your meaning.

Regular market gains aren't anything to reinvest as long as you still hold the asset, as they are (along with losses) part of the asset. You have 1 share at 50.00, and if goes up by 5 cents, you still have just 1 share, but now at 50.05.
 

AP90

Member
What kind of fund does that?


It's been becoming a pretty big gift in recent years. We're starting to see the rise of the exponential curve on our dividends, which is pretty neat.


I am hoping for this within 4-5 years when my deferred comp account starts approaching 6 figures.
 

j_rocca42

Member
What are the advantages of an auto rebalance? I haven't rebalanced my account in years. Was thinking of enrolling in an auto rebalance.
 

Vard

Member
My friend raves about Lending Club.
I use Lending Club too and recommend it. I joined in 2013 or so, after Mr. Money Mustache wrote some useful blog posts about it on his site. It has a very 'set it and forget' approach and it only goes up.
 

tokkun

Member
What are the advantages of an auto rebalance? I haven't rebalanced my account in years. Was thinking of enrolling in an auto rebalance.

Rebalancing has two purposes:

1. It allows you to maintain whatever degree of volatility / risk you are comfortable with in your investments. Let's say you are a conservative person, so you want a 50/50 stock/bond split. Because stocks historically outperform bonds over the long periods, if you leave that account alone, it will become more and more stock-weighted over the years, which will expose you more to the volatility of stocks.

2. It can provide some protection against bubbles and allow you to take advantage of value pricing. Since rebalancing keeps a steady ratio between the amount of different types of stock you own, as one type increases in value (say US stocks) it will sell some of that type to buy another type that hasn't risen as fast (say International or Emerging Markets). If you believe in the idea of 'reversion to the mean', this automatically shifts your money away from overpriced assets and toward underpriced ones.

As for why you should prefer auto-rebalancing versus manual rebalancing, it's because either you will forget to do it, or because humans have been repeatedly shown to do the opposite of proper rebalancing (that is, concentrating positions in overvalued stocks) when they do. Your goal should be to set up your investments in such a way as to require as little human interaction as possible.

By the way, there is one disadvantage to rebalancing that I should call out: if you rebalance in a taxable account by selling an asset, it may trigger capital gains tax.
 

Alucrid

Banned
while visiting my parents they dug out a few old 1k ee bonds they had for me. only worth 660 right now, but it's also only 1.39% per month. pretty sure i'm just going to cash them and either contribute them to my roth or help pay off my student loans. not sure which though
 
while visiting my parents they dug out a few old 1k ee bonds they had for me. only worth 660 right now, but it's also only 1.39% per month. pretty sure i'm just going to cash them and either contribute them to my roth or help pay off my student loans. not sure which though
How much longer til maturity?
 

Piecake

Member
Is there a reason Vanguard is so highly recommended? I'm thinking of opening an IRA with Schwab and using their S&P500 Index Fund and their Total Stock Market Fund over Vanguards.

Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund compared to Vanguard equivalent:
https://www.google.com/finance?chdn...dms=0&q=MUTF:SWTSX&&ei=Xk-AVuHZK4G9iwKZioyICQ

Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund compared to Vanguard equivalent:
https://www.google.com/finance?chdn...ptdms=0&q=MUTF:SWPPX&&ei=FlGAVoDMOuuvigL597J4

The only real difference is if you want to support their business model

Vanguard is owned by the funds themselves and, as a result, is owned by the investors in the funds.[5]

I do, so that is who I have my investments with. Everything else is really the same. The customer service is also great at Vanguard, though other places also might have great customer service as well.
 

hollomat

Banned
I use Lending Club too and recommend it. I joined in 2013 or so, after Mr. Money Mustache wrote some useful blog posts about it on his site. It has a very 'set it and forget' approach and it only goes up.

For now. I've used lending club since 2012, however for the past year I've been cashing out all my money. My biggest fear is that another event like 2008 will happen and these loans will begin to go bad at an extremely high rate since they are made to people using them to pay off other debt. If you keep reinvesting the money received from the loans and a high rate of them go bad all at once, even if you've averaged 7 or 8% a year til then, your investment will tank.
 
The only real difference is if you want to support their business model



I do, so that is who I have my investments with. Everything else is really the same. The customer service is also great at Vanguard, though other places also might have great customer service as well.

What does that get me at the end of the day? Is the concern that Schwab might go belly up or get bought out?

I already have a Vanguard investment account already. Just not an IRA.
 

Piecake

Member
What does that get me at the end of the day? Is the concern that Schwab might go belly up or get bought out?

I already have a Vanguard investment account already. Just not an IRA.

Nothing and nope. All you get is the satisfaction that you are not enriching some absurdly wealthy Wall St CEO, though I am sure that the leaders and Vanguard get paid very well.

If you already have a Vanguard account, why move? Seems like a lot more hassle when there is really zero financial game from it.
 
Is there a reason Vanguard is so highly recommended? I'm thinking of opening an IRA with Schwab and using their S&P500 Index Fund and their Total Stock Market Fund over Vanguards.

Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund compared to Vanguard equivalent:
https://www.google.com/finance?chdn...dms=0&q=MUTF:SWTSX&&ei=Xk-AVuHZK4G9iwKZioyICQ

Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund compared to Vanguard equivalent:
https://www.google.com/finance?chdn...ptdms=0&q=MUTF:SWPPX&&ei=FlGAVoDMOuuvigL597J4

I have a Roth IRA and a brokerage account with Schwab. Their customer service is good, at least the few time I've needed to call them. I have the ETF equivalent of SWTSX - SCHB which with .03% in fees is close to about as good as it gets.
 

Makai

Member
I told myself I would never do this, but I've commited the cardinal sin. I've sold half of my retirement funds and I will sell the other half if need be. I've lived in the South for most of my life but I've wanted to live in a metropolis forever. My lease ends at the end of the year and I've decided I need to gtfo. I'm moving to NYC and looking for work when I get there. My retirement funds will tide me over for a few months and I'm sure I'll find work by then. There are way more software jobs in New York (my previous employer might qualify as a monopsony) and wages are $20-30k higher. My new apartment is the same price as my current one, so it seems like a no-brainer. Everything else is a static cost (student loan, car loan) or in the same ballpark according to stats and anecdotes from friends (food). I don't think this will damage my longterm retirement goals because I'm only 24 and started contributing this year.
 

S.Dedalus

Member
I told myself I would never do this, but I've commited the cardinal sin. I've sold half of my retirement funds and I will sell the other half if need be. I've lived in the South for most of my life but I've wanted to live in a metropolis forever. My lease ends at the end of the year and I've decided I need to gtfo. I'm moving to NYC and looking for work when I get there. My retirement funds will tide me over for a few months and I'm sure I'll find work by then. There are way more software jobs in New York (my previous employer might qualify as a monopsony) and wages are $20-30k higher. My new apartment is the same price as my current one, so it seems like a no-brainer. Everything else is a static cost (student loan, car loan) or in the same ballpark according to stats and anecdotes from friends (food). I don't think this will damage my longterm retirement goals because I'm only 24 and started contributing this year.

Daaaaaang, that sounds terrifying. Do you have any backup plans in case you don't find a good enough job after several months? I'm sure thousands of other people are going to be looking for the same jobs you're looking for.

You're young, so this is the time to do crazy ass stuff like this. Congrats on making the change, and I hope it all works out!
 

Makai

Member
Daaaaaang, that sounds terrifying. Do you have any backup plans in case you don't find a good enough job after several months? I'm sure thousands of other people are going to be looking for the same jobs you're looking for.

You're young, so this is the time to do crazy ass stuff like this. Congrats on making the change, and I hope it all works out!
I can move to Research Triangle Park, which is an inexpensive area with software jobs.

It would be weird if I didn't find work, though. There aren't many places with a higher concentration of software companies. Economy has reached full employment. Rhetoric from major tech companies is that there's a shortage of like a million programmers.
 
I can understand the draw to NYC, but Charlotte also isn't a bad place to be for a programmer if you want city life (though obviously smaller) and affordable southern living.
 

Wellington

BAAAALLLINNN'
I told myself I would never do this, but I've commited the cardinal sin. I've sold half of my retirement funds and I will sell the other half if need be. I've lived in the South for most of my life but I've wanted to live in a metropolis forever. My lease ends at the end of the year and I've decided I need to gtfo. I'm moving to NYC and looking for work when I get there. My retirement funds will tide me over for a few months and I'm sure I'll find work by then. There are way more software jobs in New York (my previous employer might qualify as a monopsony) and wages are $20-30k higher. My new apartment is the same price as my current one, so it seems like a no-brainer. Everything else is a static cost (student loan, car loan) or in the same ballpark according to stats and anecdotes from friends (food). I don't think this will damage my longterm retirement goals because I'm only 24 and started contributing this year.

Wow. Pushing your chips to the middle of the table.

I've lived in New York my whole life, PM me if you have any questions.
 
I've used TurboTax for years but last year switched to TaxAct as it was less expensive for me to file. I'm undecided this year - I think TaxAct will again be cheaper but I like TurboTax better as it feels more intuitive.
 
I told myself I would never do this, but I've commited the cardinal sin. I've sold half of my retirement funds and I will sell the other half if need be. I've lived in the South for most of my life but I've wanted to live in a metropolis forever. My lease ends at the end of the year and I've decided I need to gtfo. I'm moving to NYC and looking for work when I get there. My retirement funds will tide me over for a few months and I'm sure I'll find work by then. There are way more software jobs in New York (my previous employer might qualify as a monopsony) and wages are $20-30k higher. My new apartment is the same price as my current one, so it seems like a no-brainer. Everything else is a static cost (student loan, car loan) or in the same ballpark according to stats and anecdotes from friends (food). I don't think this will damage my longterm retirement goals because I'm only 24 and started contributing this year.

I was reading this post like "damn" but then I read that you are only 24. Still very young, it honestly isn't a biggie, and honestly, depending on the ratio of what you can save in both locations, you may end up even or slightly better.
 

j_rocca42

Member
Rebalancing has two purposes:

1. It allows you to maintain whatever degree of volatility / risk you are comfortable with in your investments. Let's say you are a conservative person, so you want a 50/50 stock/bond split. Because stocks historically outperform bonds over the long periods, if you leave that account alone, it will become more and more stock-weighted over the years, which will expose you more to the volatility of stocks.

2. It can provide some protection against bubbles and allow you to take advantage of value pricing. Since rebalancing keeps a steady ratio between the amount of different types of stock you own, as one type increases in value (say US stocks) it will sell some of that type to buy another type that hasn't risen as fast (say International or Emerging Markets). If you believe in the idea of 'reversion to the mean', this automatically shifts your money away from overpriced assets and toward underpriced ones.

As for why you should prefer auto-rebalancing versus manual rebalancing, it's because either you will forget to do it, or because humans have been repeatedly shown to do the opposite of proper rebalancing (that is, concentrating positions in overvalued stocks) when they do. Your goal should be to set up your investments in such a way as to require as little human interaction as possible.

By the way, there is one disadvantage to rebalancing that I should call out: if you rebalance in a taxable account by selling an asset, it may trigger capital gains tax.

Good info here. Thank you. One more question. Is there a such thing as rebalancing too often? I'm debating on doing a quarterly or yearly rebalance for my 401k.

I was 100% stock in my 20s. Now that I'm in my 30s I'm 90/10 stock/bond and plan on slowly moving those ratios closer to 50/50 as I get closer to retirement age.
 

tokkun

Member
Good info here. Thank you. One more question. Is there a such thing as rebalancing too often? I'm debating on doing a quarterly or yearly rebalance for my 401k.

I was 100% stock in my 20s. Now that I'm in my 30s I'm 90/10 stock/bond and plan on slowly moving those ratios closer to 50/50 as I get closer to retirement age.

The only reason not to rebalance as frequently as possible is if it costs you money to do so - for instance if it is a taxable account or if you are using ETFs and have to pay a trading fee.

You might want to consider putting your money in a Target Date fund. They do all that stuff you want to do automatically.
 

Swig_

Member
I don't often mess around with my long-term investments, but I've been watching VTIAX and it has been tanking ever since I picked it up. I'm wondering if I should move my funds in that account to another Admiral Shares fund. I wanted the diversity of having some of my money in an international fund, but I've been very unhappy with picking it up.

Anyone care to help me decide whether to hang on to it and hope for improvement or to drop it and pick something else up? Any advice or opinion would be greatly appreciated!
 
I don't often mess around with my long-term investments, but I've been watching VTIAX and it has been tanking ever since I picked it up. I'm wondering if I should move my funds in that account to another Admiral Shares fund. I wanted the diversity of having some of my money in an international fund, but I've been very unhappy with picking it up.

Anyone care to help me decide whether to hang on to it and hope for improvement or to drop it and pick something else up? Any advice or opinion would be greatly appreciated!

How long have you held it? Don't fret over short duration movement.

That said, in looking at that one, it does seem to trail well behind the international fund I have in my blend (which is a 401K fund). The fund you have seems to have a sizable exposure to emerging markets (~14%), and those have been doing badly, which could help explain your lack of performance. A different international fund from Vanguard (and better rated) only includes developed markets, and it has done better over the recent years (though it also hasn't performed great this year, but that's life). The lack of emerging markets in that fund reduces your risk and volatility, but it could also potentially reduce rewards if emerging markets start showing higher growth, so just keep that in mind.

Here's a snapshot 5 year view to show how they've fared, with yours (VTIAX) in blue and VTMGX in green:

dLefa7U.png


Edit: I also agree with what GhaleonEB says below. You're getting international exposure in your domestic holdings, particularly your large cap. I still include international in my blend, but it's in the low teens as a percentage, not something approaching 20, 30, or even 40%, as is sometimes recommended. But that's me and I'm not you.
 

GhaleonEB

Member
I don't often mess around with my long-term investments, but I've been watching VTIAX and it has been tanking ever since I picked it up. I'm wondering if I should move my funds in that account to another Admiral Shares fund. I wanted the diversity of having some of my money in an international fund, but I've been very unhappy with picking it up.

Anyone care to help me decide whether to hang on to it and hope for improvement or to drop it and pick something else up? Any advice or opinion would be greatly appreciated!

There's been a fair amount of dueling opinions on international diversification. I'm in international funds as well and have been for a long time, but I'm starting to come around to the view that it's not necessary for a well balanced portfolio. Not only have they lagged US indexes over the medium term, but it's in some ways duplicitous, since US corporations make a very large proportion of their earnings from overseas. When you hold the S&P500 you get a lot of international exposure.
 

Swig_

Member
How long have you held it? Don't fret over short duration movement.

That said, in looking at that one, it does seem to trail well behind the international fund I have in my blend (which is a 401K fund). The fund you have seems to have a sizable exposure to emerging markets (~14%), and those have been doing badly, which could help explain your lack of performance. A different international fund from Vanguard (and better rated) only includes developed markets, and it has done better over the recent years (though it also hasn't performed great this year, but that's life). The lack of emerging markets in that fund reduces your risk and volatility, but it could also potentially reduce rewards if emerging markets start showing higher growth, so just keep that in mind.

Here's a snapshot 5 year view to show how they've fared, with yours (VTIAX) in blue and VTMGX in green:


Edit: I also agree with what GhaleonEB says below. You're getting international exposure in your domestic holdings, particularly your large cap. I still include international in my blend, but it's in the low teens as a percentage, not something approaching 20, 30, or even 40%, as is sometimes recommended. But that's me and I'm not you.

Thanks for the info. I think that I wanted the emerging markets exposure when I bought it, which is why I chose that fund. I think I'm going to drop it for something else, possibly VTMGX. I'm still young, so I thought that the volatility would be okay, but all it has done is lost money. I've had it for about a year or so, I think. Maybe I'll take the money in this fund and find a different international fund and lower the percentage of my portfolio devoted to international. Maybe lower it to 10-15%. I'll have to research some funds to see what I think might be the best choice. This is all money in my IRA, so it's all long-term. I have a fund through T. Rowe Price that I love, maybe I'll invest some of this money in a similar fund with Vanguard, if one exists. The TRP fund is PRHSX. It's more volatile, but has been very good to me for a few years.
 

Swig_

Member
There's been a fair amount of dueling opinions on international diversification. I'm in international funds as well and have been for a long time, but I'm starting to come around to the view that it's not necessary for a well balanced portfolio. Not only have they lagged US indexes over the medium term, but it's in some ways duplicitous, since US corporations make a very large proportion of their earnings from overseas. When you hold the S&P500 you get a lot of international exposure.

Yeah, those are very good points. Like I said in my last post, I think I may drop it and find something else. Now it's a matter of where to put that money!
 
With today's drop, the S&P 500 finished the year down < 1%, though with dividends, most people probably saw ~1% of growth. (The average dividend yield for S&P 500 is ~2%.)
 

tokkun

Member
There's been a fair amount of dueling opinions on international diversification. I'm in international funds as well and have been for a long time, but I'm starting to come around to the view that it's not necessary for a well balanced portfolio. Not only have they lagged US indexes over the medium term, but it's in some ways duplicitous, since US corporations make a very large proportion of their earnings from overseas. When you hold the S&P500 you get a lot of international exposure.

You get exposure to the health of foreign economies, but you don't get exposure to foreign equity prices. Meaning you are vulnerable to a bubble in US equity prices relative to the rest of the world.

There is quite a bit of variation in valuations, and US equities are toward the high end at present:
http://www.starcapital.de/research/stockmarketvaluation
 

Mr.Mike

Member
There's also foreign companies operating in America. Limiting your equity holdings to only American stocks is a kinda weird and arbitrary way to limit your diversification, especially in an increasingly globalized world.
 

AP90

Member
I'll keep using TurboTax Online until I find reason to change.

This and..

Turbo tax deluxe is normally around $50 dollars or some within the next month or so. It allows you to do more than one persons taxes on it. And if you have used it previously, and you saved the old TurboTax file data from the previous year (on separate USB flash drive) you can load it, transfer your info and save yourself some time if there were t many changes to your incone and etc.
 

AP90

Member
With today's drop, the S&P 500 finished the year down < 1%, though with dividends, most people probably saw ~1% of growth. (The average dividend yield for S&P 500 is ~2%.)

This. Through my deferred at work can't touch w/o heavy penalties till 59.5yrs old, I have money invested in:

VWENX admiral-balanced (stock/bonds)
VMCPX mid cap
VPMAX admiral-large cap
VIIIX large cap

The reinvested dividends/cap gains have kept me positive for the year.

AND a Stable fund through my work (actually has done pretty well considering the market for this year 1.41%)
 

GhaleonEB

Member
You get exposure to the health of foreign economies, but you don't get exposure to foreign equity prices. Meaning you are vulnerable to a bubble in US equity prices relative to the rest of the world.

There is quite a bit of variation in valuations, and US equities are toward the high end at present:
http://www.starcapital.de/research/stockmarketvaluation
This is true, but given the long term nature of retirement savings I'm far more interested in long term trends rather than valuations in the moment. For that reason I'm not concerned with the US equity prices ATM.

There's also foreign companies operating in America. Limiting your equity holdings to only American stocks is a kinda weird and arbitrary way to limit your diversification, especially in an increasingly globalized world.
It's not really arbitrary, just recognizing that you do get exposure to foreign economies through US companies. Regardless of how you go with international investments it's a good element to keep in mind.

As an aside, a couple years ago I read John Bogle's updated edition of Common Sense on Mutual Funds. He had a big section on international diversification, and the preponderance of the data demonstrated US diversification was more than sufficient for exposure. He argued it was a needless complication for US investors to also hold international indexes, and the data seemed to back that argument up.. That said, I still hold them, though as a smaller proportion of my portfolio than I used to, in part because of the way US markets overlap with them. I didn't really take that into account previously.
 

Piecake

Member
Its a new year! Woo!!

Perhaps there are a few people out there that are reading this who haven't started investing for the future, and a good new year's resolution would be to start doing that. Love your future self and don't consign him/her into a life of miserable poverty!

Procrastination is bad for your health!. I should know, I am definitely a procrastinator (thankfully not in this area), and doesnt that feeling that you know you should do something but you just can't force yourself to do it, and feel bad not doing it suck? I know that feeling too well.

Well, the best way to get around that is not to tell yourself that you will get it done tomorrow, but set a specific time, a specific location, and a specific task (that task would be to look over and take some first steps towards retirement investing). When you make it specific, and not just say you will get it done tomorrow or some time in the future, you are far more likely to actually do it. And eventually (hopefully) it will become a habit (Sadly, I have yet to cure my procrastination for everything).
 
I love New Years. I've maxed out my contributions for this year and now the long wait for 2017.

Is it a good idea to max out on the first of the year? I thought January is a historically bad month for the market. I always try to max out by the quarter one dividends (at the end of March).
 
Top Bottom