My guess is that since IGN owns Humble, there is literally zero cost in handing this out to Choice users. I'm sure they have a few people (and they know exactly how many and who) that subscribe to both services and will likely lose a small amount of IGN Plus revenue. Meanwhile, they can use this as a way to overinflate their IGN subscriber count, and also potentially use Humble as a way to drive clicks to IGN ("people might go to our site if they get ad-free as a perk") that'll drive their ad revenue for non-Plus members.Rather they took ignorant plus out of the package and its associated costs, thank you
Classic is 11.99 so I don't think so.I guess this supercedes the few of us still on the grandfathered classic plan?
Nowadays, before the cost update, is there any difference between "classic" and "monthly" subscription?Classic is 11.99 so I don't think so.
Can you pause regular monthly sub?Nowadays, before the cost update, is there any difference between "classic" and "monthly" subscription?
I remember they originally limited the number of games you could choose, but now I can't see any aside from the price (12'99 $ [Classic] Vs 9'99 $ (Monthly]).
I believe the only difference now is that classic is always in USD regardless of where you are in the world.Nowadays, before the cost update, is there any difference between "classic" and "monthly" subscription?
Can you pause regular monthly sub?
Ya, some of the charities they picked are very questionable. On those I do 0% to the charity, minimum to Humble, max to developers.I've had a negative view on the Humble org for years now. Attempts to commoditize what was once a cool charity gives the slipperiest, scummiest vibes you can imagine. Now it's nothing but a way to get cheap keys. I don't know if they still let you pick who gets your money, but I would have a hard time feeling good about either end of that slider.
IGN Plus