It literally is a functional medium. It's like shitting on DVDs or CDs. What the hell is your problem, Mrs. Thunberg? Seriously, there are way more useless things out there creating way more waste that you can pick on than this idea for game preservation and a hobbyist display piece.
DVDs and CDs were functional because they solved a real problem in their time: mass game distribution when everyone didn't have gigabit internet and terabytes of storage.
Your SD-card boxes don't solve anything
They're not cheaper, not bigger, not more durable, not more reliable, not greener, and not better for preservation. They're just memory cards dressed up like retro cartridges.
There's nothing wrong with liking display pieces. Collectors do it all the time.
The problem is you keep pretending it's some superior method of storing games, and when that gets challenged the only card you can play is calling people "Greta."
When you have to hide behind nicknames instead of explaining the supposed "functionality," it just proves the point:
You don't want a better storage method.
You want a prop.
And that's fine! Just own it. Nobody cares if you like flashy boxes. What people laugh at is acting like plastic merch is a meaningful preservation breakthrough.
Nobody who brings up the waste argument for something like this gives two shits about the environment. Just be honest. You don't like it for other reasons.
Saying "people who mention waste don't actually care about the environment" is just a way to avoid responding to the point
I never said display pieces are bad. I said calling SD-card cartridges "a functional preservation medium" is nonsense, they are more expensive, less durable, lower capacity, and add more plastic for the exact same job an external drive already does
If someone likes the aesthetic, great.
If someone claims it's a better storage solution, expect pushback
Dismissing criticism by guessing people's motives doesn't make the idea smarter, it just shows you can't defend it