Irobot82
Member
780 gtx ti sli will last 3+ years at 4k
eeehehhhhh. More like 1440p. 780ti's SLI at 1080p will last 5 years.
780 gtx ti sli will last 3+ years at 4k
780 gtx ti sli will last 3+ years at 4k
eeehehhhhh. More like 1440p. 780ti's SLI at 1080p will last 5 years.
Considering a pair of 480s can still run Battlefield 4 at 1080p/80+fps on maxed settings (no AA), I have faith that a set of 780 ti will be able to run games 3 years from now at 4k at medium/high settings, no AA, at 30+fps...maybe.
It can barely do 60 FPS at 4k now, what makes you think it could last 3+ years?
Whether a 480 can run a game at 1080p60 has nothing to do with whether a 780 Ti can run a game at 4k.
Once you add in fans and the rest, it's quite a bit more.
But even with just two EK radiators and the D5 pump/res, you're already at $350. No fittings, blocks, or anything.
There's this one that I like too: http://www.frozencpu.com/products/2...oton_and_Free_Dead-Water.html?tl=g59c683s2176
I've used bay reservoirs and internal reservoirs, and I'll never go back to the bay res. The internal ones allow you to decouple them by mounting on foam pads and the like to even further reduce noise.
780 gtx ti sli will last 3 years at 1080p?
Yes.
...fuuc
Quick question. My 280x should arrive tomorrow and I want to play some "older" games (the Batman series or Witcher 2 for example) my 460 gtx wasn't quite able to handle on high/ultra. Can you guys link me a good faq/guide for downsampling? I really have no clue and the google results are quite overwhelming.
Quick question. My 280x should arrive tomorrow and I want to play some "older" games (the Batman series or Witcher 2 for example) my 460 gtx wasn't quite able to handle on high/ultra. Can you guys link me a good faq/guide for downsampling? I really have no clue and the google results are quite overwhelming.
I need a few more days testing, but it looks like I don't have to reinstall WOW or Windows. I think it was an add on that was crashing my Nvidia driver while playing WOW. I had worries that maybe my graphics card got damaged or something in the move from California.
I have the MSI Gaming 5 and really like it. Tbh since that combo saves you $20 over the UD3H, I can't really think of a reason not to go for it.Question on choosing a motherboard. So, the current plan I have is getting a 4790k at Microcenter at $279 and ordering the Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H off of Amazon for $139. But! I noticed Microcenter has some good (I think) CPU/mobo deals. What do you guys think of these compared to what my current plan is?
They aren't a nono, they are just not very good gaming CPUs. Excellent budget multimedia creation processors though.
So, this probably like a stupid question for those of you are clearly in the know about PC gaming, but I'm not so much.
In the OP, the build under Good-Very Capable, more or less, would it be a viable machine for gaming currently and a decent amount in the future?
I'm hesitant to say yes because we don't know what vram requirements will be like in 3 years (even at 1080p). It depends on if you want / must have max settings & ultra textures 3 years from now or not. It's best to buy what you can today for your needs now and re-evaluate 3 years from now.
I would say with the i5 derivative you'd be capable of decent 1080p gaming for some time.
PC gaming is a personal thing, some just like playing at native resolution and medium settings, others insist on 1080p+ resolutions on ultra at 60fps+. That's when the money goes up and up.
What the?Made my new build yesterday,
Case : Corsair Graphite 600T
CPU : Intel i7 4790K
Mobo : Asus Sabertooth Z97 Mark1
Cooler : Corsair H75
and transfered all my other stuff in it : 16GB Corsair Vengeance, HDD and SSD and my SLI ASUS GTX 670.
I essentially went from Ivy Bridge i5 3570K @4,3ghz to Haswell i7 4790K @4,4ghz (for now) and damn does it make a difference. I'm getting 60 fps average on Rome 2 benchmark with max settings, and played a bit of Planetside 2 and while I was dipping to the low 20's I never went down 55fps yesterday, even during huge battles and most of the time hovering around 76fps
Haven't tried Watch Dogs yet but imo i7 does matter when it comes to gaming.
What the?
This isn't anything to do with driver or game optimisation since the last time you played? That's pretty crazy if not.
What the?
This isn't anything to do with driver or game optimisation since the last time you played? That's pretty crazy if not.
I'm considering buying one of those korean 1440p ips monitors, but I'm not sure if it's right for my situation. I'm going to be gaming on a PC powered by a 750ti and with a ps4.
As I understand it, most of these monitors don't have a scaler so the ps4 play would be iffy. And with the power level of the 750ti, playing at 1440p might require too many graphics and frame rate sacrifices.
What do you guys think? Would I be better off with a 1080p monitor?
Nah I kept the same drivers and the same graphic cards, game has never been so fluid. I'm baffled why they never test cpu hungry games like PS2 and put shit like Tomb Raider and Bioshock Infinite in benchmarks.
Basically anytime the fps dips now, it's due my GPU in Planetside 2 and not the CPU anymore.
Edit : and it's been like 1.5 months I haven't played Planetside 2, I cameback to check their optimizations but the game still didn't run in an acceptable way on my rig. In any case, I'm glad I took an i7 instead of i5 this time around.
Any opinions?
I dunno, man. I have an i5 3570K@4.2 and I never drop below 40fps even in massive 500 person battles where you can't see half the people shooting at you.
I'm running into an odd situation - I've always used HWMonitor to track my CPU temps to see if things are getting too hot. I recently picked up a new motherboard that has a LED CPU temp gauge on the back that gives out a basic reading in Celsius. I picked up a 4790k to go along with it and installed a h90i (first time with anything water), and have been keeping tabs on my temps before I OC the CPU at all. However, HWMonitor is giving me readings 15-20 degrees above what the mobo shows in addition to the ASUS software that comes bundled with it (i.e. everything asus is giving me lower readings). Anyway to tell which is more reliable between HWMonitor and whatever the mobo is telling me? It's a big difference in my comfort level if I'm hitting 60 under loads versus a # in the 80s.
Can anyone suggest a good PSU?
I have an asus motherboard which gives me some surge protection bullshit and reboots by itself whenever I play certain games for 30 minutes or so.
My current PSU is a 7 year old Corsair VX550 which has been fantastic and I doubt it's the actual cause of the problem, but might as well upgrade it.
My dilemma is that I was set on getting another Corsair (AX760) or Seasonic (X650 or XP660) but, I stumbled onto the EVGA Supernova G2 750 which is made by super flower and reviewers seem to think it's the bees knees, it's also $80 cheaper than the corsair, $20 cheaper than the SSX and $50 cheaper than the SSXP.
Which of the above would be best?
Is the EVGA Supernova G2 really as good as a Seasonic made PSU, especially considering how much cheaper it is?
Do Seasonic made PSUs still have issues with coil whine?
Random note, never let your CPU cooler get filled with dust. I let it go without properly cleaning it for 3 months. For reference, I wanted to see how much of a temperature difference it would make before and after cleaning, so I went max load (97-99% usage) on it with video rendering, for about 30 mins per test. (It's an i7-3770k Ivy Bridge w/ stock Intel cooler, which works surprisingly well.)
Before cleaning: 78-81 degrees across all cores.
After cleaning: 62-67 degrees across all cores.
I'm in a similar dilemma and have decided to upgrade in future but stick with 1080p for now. There will come a time in a couple of years when it will be necessary to upgrade my build a little just to keep up, and then that would prompt a significant outlay (by then DDR4 will be the norm, I'd have to get a new motherboard for a new chipset, etc.). This outlay would hopefully allow me to game at good framerates in 1440p.
Not to mention the Korean monitors I've been looking at apparently don't play ball with a PS4 at all.
When I build my new system in the near future, I will have enough old parts to build a second PC (save for RAM, which is cheap anyway).
My thought is: Keep the new, high-end PC as a dedicated gaming machine and re-build my old one as a dedicated everyday use system (browsing, videos, email, etc).
Downside is that I will have to split off another cable from my router (or buy a wireless dongle) to share internets, as well as having to physically set the thing up on another computer desk.
So what I am wondering is: has anyone else here gone with a similar set up? Or should I just stick with the new high-end and do it all.
Specs that matter on the new one will be: i5-4690, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, Radeon HD 7950, 750W PSU
It's made for it.Thanks for the input. Can an HTPC setup run well off of a mobo's on-board GPU?