Ah, in that case, nevermind then, though 4 gigs will not be enough to play the games he wants to play. Star Citizen requires 8 gigs minimum. how much would a single 8 gig stick set him back vs a 4? Then again , star citizen is looking like 2016, so he has plenty of time to toss in another stick or three to get up to 8 or 16 gigs of ram. Your picks are his best bet right at the moment.
EDIT: Yea, i saw the $140 270X 2gb, its worth the extra $20 for the 4GB version i found IMO, going forward 2 gigs is going to be a severe hinderance.
Oh yeah, you're right, completely missed that you said it was the 4GB version.
Cheers will go with 8gb worth it for what the cost is likely to be.
It was a motherboard failure - the rig was built in 05 Atx Tower/Amd Athlon Socket 939/DDR only salvageable parts is the case and fans really - still using the GPU in an older borrowed system but its dying slowly. The original PSU dies I still have the replacement its an Arctic Power 500W(2008) but I don't think it has the PCI power sockets required.
Quite happy to save £60 in the lower cpu and stock cooler for now but still gonna consider it - cheers
I thought the Z97 was the better chipset - am I not really going to lose anything by going with a slightly older mb chipset?
Oh, I see. That's more than enough reason to want a new power supply. Going with the lower CPU is OK, it's just a matter of priorities and when and where you want to spend. While it's true that a lot of games set 8GB of RAM as a requirement, a lot of them also put down quad cores (i5 2500K, 3570K, 4690K, for example) as a requirement as well. RAM can be added to, but processors will have to be entirely replaced. With less RAM you can't multi-task as well, but at least you can try to close down as many programs as you can before running the game, but it's not possible to improve FPS from lower end CPUs (overclocking would be a solution, but Intel only allows that on certain CPUs, mainly the enthusiast level £150+ CPUs).
Z97 is the better chipset - but H97 is not older, it's just cheaper and comes with fewer features, generally speaking.
Go with what you can budget for - if you just need to get the computer up and running now, going with the i3 is a perfectly fine solution. There's still next year's high end Broadwell processors that you can upgrade to. Save up for then, you might have to wait, but you'll get an excellent computer.