These look great, and the price is nice too. Thanks man!If that's all it's gonna be used for, take a look at the ASUS Transformer Book or Transformer 3.
These look great, and the price is nice too. Thanks man!If that's all it's gonna be used for, take a look at the ASUS Transformer Book or Transformer 3.
I'm putting together a new PC build to replace my girlfriend's aging system, and wanted to double check with you all before going ahead with it. This will be a from scratch build, there's not really anything reusable from her current computer.
Here's the build as it stands: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/N3yHLD
It's very similar to the "good" build. I went up to 16GB for better multitasking and overhead, and left out the SSD, though I may end up adding one in. My main questions are:
-Does anyone have experience with the ASRock MB I picked, or that company in general? I chose it because the Gigabyte B250M has only 1 fan connector and (IIRC) only 1 PCIEx16 slot. The ASRock has only 2 mem slots but should be able to accomodate an NVMe drive and better fan connections. Am I totally misreading this? This is the main area I'm not sure of.
-Opinions on the Seagate drive, or other 2TB drives? I don't see 2TB WD Blues available, that would probably be my first pick. Also looking for opinions on memory modules, I just chose the most reasonable priced compatible ones.
-Will that PSU cover me? Looks like it should be plenty but I appreciate confirmation.
Also, while researching her build, I was looking to upgrading my current PC, which is getting older but still running pretty well for me (i5-3570k, 8GB RAM, GTX 560). I don't really want to do two builds at the same time, but I was thinking of switching up to the same RX 470 GPU in her build. Would I be making things horribly out of whack/bottlenecked in my PC if I did that? It's likely that I would do a full upgrade next year around the card, but getting a temp performance boost now would be nice.
I think you've got me confused with someone else. Look again, I went with a Z270 board, the Asus ROG Strix Z270F.Hey MSI Armor 1080 buddy ^^ It's a damn good card, good choice! Rest of the build looks good too, though I'll echo the question of why you chose a z170 board instead of a z270 and whether it worked out of the box.
ok boys here it is. the omen x35 ultra wide monitor 3440x1440, 100htz gsync. this is my jump from 1080p and because of this i have some questions. First my rig
corsair air 540 pc case.
asus z97-deluxe motherboard
intel 4770k cpu overclocked to 4.2 ghz
asus 1080 strix video card overclocked to 2202 clock
g. skill 16 gigs of ram
evga 850 watt psu
corsair cpu cooler h100i
so im use to 1080p maxing everything out and getting 60fps. So everything is maxed for example overwatch and my max fps is 70ish, witcher 3 max is around 60-63, wildlands is around 55-60. this is with tweaking the graphics a bit. am i capped out? if i want to hit 100fps is my option 1080ti or do you guys think my cpu is bottlenecking.
pics of the new monitor. its beautiful
Congrats! What do you think of the Omen X? Any backlight bleed issues or any other issues? I've been thinking about getting it since the Acer X34P received a significant delay.
Ultrawide 1440P is fairly demanding, so I'm not surprised that you get the fps you are getting. It sounds about right tbh. 1080 Ti would definitely be a great choice.
I think you've got me confused with someone else. Look again, I went with a Z270 board, the Asus ROG Strix Z270F.
Guys I have a question. I was interested in getting a 144hz monitor. My current one is 60hz. So when v sync on i get 60 fps at most. My current setup is i5 6600 3.2 ghz, Gtx 1070 8gb. You think I can benefit from a 144hz monitor? I almost always play on 1080p. Therefore, I won't mind a 1080p 144hz monitor. If you guys think I can benefit from it with my current setup I will get one for sure.
You will benefit easily, go get it!
There is no going back to 60hz after you experience 144hz.
I went back...
The first 144 monitor I got had terrible color and contrast compared to the screen I was using before it. Been a few years now so I'm hoping I can find a new better monitor soon.It is an endless quest since I haven't been satisfied with a monitor/tv purchase in an eternity.
I went back...
The first 144 monitor I got had terrible color and contrast compared to the screen I was using before it. Been a few years now so I'm hoping I can find a new better monitor soon.It is an endless quest since I haven't been satisfied with a monitor/tv purchase in an eternity.
In that case avoid TN like the plague. Go IPS or VA.
Im sure those 144hz ips screen are at least on same level with your current unless you have some very good 60hz screen.
I had a TN and went to an IPS. Not the biggest fan of the glow but it's colors are still great. Worse is the back light bleed on top of the glow. Looked into some benq VA monitors last time I was looking but just didn't want to commit at the time.
I really really hate backlight bleed and glow is up there with it. Seems for a while at least every monitor came with a risk of moderate to serious bleed.
At this point it's more that I've gotten use to what I have and shelling out a grand for a new monitor would make it harder for me to overlook it's flaws again. What are the really good quality wise 144hz screens now? No washed out colors and crushed blacks in service of higher hz. It's weird that that is so important to me since I normally always want higher frame rate over better graphics. Guess it's because I've settled on 60fps and a poor quality screen is a hardware problem that can't really be fixed with changing settings. Also I'd pay a high price for it to have no bleed or panel deformities.
Can someone suggest me some good and affordable 144hz monitor? Budget around 250.
I have a general overclocking question.
About six months ago I put this together, with more than fair bit of input from this thread's predecessor, and honestly, I couldn't be happier. It was surprisingly fun to put together, it runs like a dream, and I've yet to find something it doesn't just chew through. Recently picked up a Acer Predator XB1, and I'm routinely hitting 120+ fps.
When I first set it up, the BIOS asked if I'd like to overclock it, and it was a joke how easy it was. It automatically ran a few tests, said I could overclock is 22% without any issue, and that's where I've been ever since.
Lately, I've been thinking about pushing it up more. After hours of playing, my CPU temp tops out around 68C, and so it seems like I have plenty of room to play safely -- but is that the point that I'm tinkering just to tinker? I've mostly been playing Overwatch, with a little bit of Rainbow Six Siege, and my frame rates are already higher than I need. Since my system stability is seemingly perfect, and performance is already great, am I just asking for trouble by pushing the envelope some? I like the idea of messing around with it to see how far I can push it, and what performance gains come with that, but I prefer having a stable machine that runs well. Am I better off calling it a day, and spend more time playing games than tinkering with options in the bios, and if/when my machine starts letting me down, then start pushing the overclock further?
In that case avoid TN like the plague. Go IPS or VA.
Guys, i need your input.
ATM i have:
Asus M5A78L-M LX3 (AM3R2)
AMD FX-6300
MSI GeForce GTX 670 2GB
8GB DDR3
This computer was a gift to me, from a dear friend, when my daughter was born. Instead of gifting something to the baby, my friend gave me this PC and told me to use the money i was going to use for the upgrade of the old one, on stuff for my kid - which made me fucking happy.
2 years have gone by and i can't play Battlefield 1 Multiplayer properly, withough severe frame drops.
Also, Mass Effect: Andromeda isn't running really that great, but since it's single player, it doesn't bug me that much.
I was thinking of buying a new CPU - FX-8320E 3.2Ghz OctaCore SktAM3 or FX-8370E 3.3Ghz OctaCore SktAM3 - and stick to that sole upgrade, since i feel like getting a new mid tier graphics card won't make much of a difference to my current one.
What i ask of you is this:
Does my reasoning make sense? If it does, makes sense to get the 8370E instead of the 8320E - theres a price difference there.
Or is it time to drop my motherboard altogher since the CPU options for it are so limited?
Cheers for your help.
SAN FRANCISCO – Intel will start making 10nm chips this year it claims will lead the industry in transistor density using a metric it challenged rivals to adopt. Separately, it announced a 22nm low-power FinFET node to compete for foundry business with fully depleted silicon-on-insulator (FD-SOI) from rivals such as Globalfoundries.
At 10nm, Intel will pack 100.8 million transistors per square millimeter. It estimated 10nm foundry processes now in production from TSMC and Samsung have about half that density. Intel's metric averages density of a small and a large logic cell. Specifically, it uses a two-input NAND cell with two active gates and a scan flip-flop cell with as many as 25 active gates.
”I think it's a comprehensive, quantitative and honest metric," said Mark Bohr, a senior fellow and director of process architecture and integration. ”TSMC and, I think, Samsung used to quote it, but my guess is they weren't looking very good with this metric anymore," he said. The existing metric of multiplying gate pitch and cell height gives a relative advance between nodes, rather than an absolute number of a node's capability. In addition, it does not include a variety of factors embraced by the density metric Intel proposed, Bohr added.
Whatever the metrics, Intel said it will start making 10nm Cannonlake chips in the second half of this year, three years after it launched its 14nm process. It expects to continue a three-year cadence, stretching 10nm with two annual upgrades to be called 10+ and 10++. ”Even with the longer time between nodes, we're staying on the same cost per transistor curve and we expect this will continue through the 10nm generation," said Stacy Smith, executive vice president of Intel's fab and sales groups.
Interestingly, Intel's 14++ sports higher performance than its initial 10nm process. However the 10nm node delivers lower power and higher density. Intel gave more details than usual about its 10nm node. The x86 giant needed to be more forthcoming to show its advantages over 10nm processes already in production at foundry rivals TSMC and Samsung.
Specifically, Intel's10nm node sports:
34nm fin pitches
53nm fin heights
36nm minimum metal pitches
272nm cell heights
54nm gate pitches
Intel claimed the node sports the tightest gate and metal pitches in the industry and marks the industry's first use of self-align quad patterning. FinFETs are 25 percent taller and more closely packed than on its 14nm node. The company described two transistor innovations to compensate for the rising costs of more lithography patterning steps. A contact-over-active-gate (COAG) helps deliver an additional 10 percent density; a single rather than double dummy gate at 10nm provides additional scaling advantages.
Analysts were impressed with Intel's 10nm node, but mixed on whether transistor density was the best metric to gauge competing nodes. It's too early to tell who will win the significant near-leading-edge business in the increasingly competitive space between 28 and 16nm, they said.
”It's time to get away from the marketing BS of these node names and let everyone see where the nodes really are...Moore's law was always about density," said G. Dan Hutcheson, president of market watcher VLSI Research.
Independent analysts who conduct chip-level teardowns will be able to check density claims using the formula, he said. But a larger size, such as a cm2, would enable a comparison more close to the size of a real SoC, he said. ”We need something to objectively compare the proliferation of node names that show dimensions that are irrelevant to their names," said Bob Johnson, a research vice president in Gartner's semiconductor group.
A spokeswoman for TSMC said former metrics based on gate density are better than more recent ones based on cell height. ”That said I have no idea how Intel does its new calculation," she said. ”For example, it's [first-generation 14nm CPU] Broadwell used to have 18.4 million transistors per mm squared, yet under the new measure it suddenly has 37.5 million transistors per mm2. Are they trying to play paper games?" The TSMC spokeswoman also noted that density alone does not translate directly to die size. Layout and other design rules are all important factors to die size and competitiveness, she said.
Seeing the numbers on the Intel 10nm process, ”I was blown away," analyst Hutcheson said. David Kanter of the Linley Group agreed. ”It's impressive density...but Intel made the point that it doesn't count until it's in production," he said. Nevertheless, ”Intel will continue to have a manufacturing lead over everyone else, the question is what that will translate into in terms of products," he added.
Can I ask an overclocking question here?
I tried to overclock my i5-2500k, on an Asrock Z77 Pro4-M. I read a couple of guides on the internet before i tried, of course.
So I went in the bios and upped the multiplier to 40x to see if it worked. I didn't touch any voltage settings.
In windows I ran prime95, the problem is that the max clock stays 3.4ghz as before. I checked the bios and the multiplier change was applied, it even says "target frequency 4Ghz". But it doesn't show in HWMonitor nor in CPU-z.
What did I do wrong?
CPU: AMD RYZEN 7 1700 3.0GHz 8-Core Processor
Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO ATX AM4 Motherboard
Memory: Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 Memory
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
Video Card: Asus Radeon RX 480 8GB Dual OC Video Card
Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ATX ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: Corsair RMx 550W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply
Wireless Network Adapter: Gigabyte GC-WB867D-I PCI-Express x1 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi Adapter
Keyboard: Microsoft Designer Bluetooth Desktop Bluetooth Wireless Slim Keyboard w/Laser Mouse
Übermatik;232992133 said:Alright, about to do my first ever build... any last minute tips for me?
Parts:
Übermatik;232992133 said:Alright, about to do my first ever build... any last minute tips for me?
Parts:
Looks good! I would maybe up the PSU a bit, the 480 is pretty power-hungry IIRC. Or wait for Vega ? ^^
I'd say read the motherboard manual. Lots of useful stuff in there.
550W is plenty.
I am going to start playing media from my PC to my home theatre/receiver /projector. I have never done this before, what is the easiest/best software that can play back essentially any media I throw at it. I am looking at lossless 7.1 audio and blu ray quality rips.
I am going to start playing media from my PC to my home theatre/receiver /projector. I have never done this before, what is the easiest/best software that can play back essentially any media I throw at it. I am looking at lossless 7.1 audio and blu ray quality rips.
Übermatik;233001637 said:GAF I need some help... Corsair Vengeance LPX RAM, ASUS X370 board - is it installed correctly?
MPCHC with a few plugins. Can your receiver play DTS?
Try pushing it further in on the right. The clips should snap on.
Did it click when you slotted it into place? It should, but in the top and bottom pics it looks like it's not entirely in.
Nice monitor!ok boys here it is. the omen x35 ultra wide monitor 3440x1440, 100htz gsync. this is my jump from 1080p and because of this i have some questions. First my rig
corsair air 540 pc case.
asus z97-deluxe motherboard
intel 4770k cpu overclocked to 4.2 ghz
asus 1080 strix video card overclocked to 2202 clock
g. skill 16 gigs of ram
evga 850 watt psu
corsair cpu cooler h100i
so im use to 1080p maxing everything out and getting 60fps. So everything is maxed for example overwatch and my max fps is 70ish, witcher 3 max is around 60-63, wildlands is around 55-60. this is with tweaking the graphics a bit. am i capped out? if i want to hit 100fps is my option 1080ti or do you guys think my cpu is bottlenecking.
pics of the new monitor. its beautiful
Übermatik;233006039 said:Clips? The ones you pull down/aside? One of them did, the other maybe didn't? Hard to tell, because...
...Nothing 'clicked'. It just sort of slotted. Pics all taken at same time. I honestly feel like I can't push it any further without breaking it. Help
Übermatik;233006039 said:Clips? The ones you pull down/aside? One of them did, the other maybe didn't? Hard to tell, because...
...Nothing 'clicked'. It just sort of slotted. Pics all taken at same time. I honestly feel like I can't push it any further without breaking it. Help
I think you did not set all the cores to 40x. There should be some kind of sync all cores option so make sure that's selected.
Thanks to ColdDeckEd for comments on my build. I've dropped the CPU to the Pentium G4560 and swapped out the PSU, and added an SSD drive, here's the new build currently:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/zG88sJ
(Original post HERE)
I will keep my eye out for deals on the RX 470. I'm not really using the prices on pcpartpicker because I'll be using Amazon Prime basically wherever I can, probably NewEgg for the rest. The G4560 looks hard to find though unfortunately.
Looking for any additional comments about the build. Still wondering if anyone has an experience or comments about the motherboard, especially now with an SSD added in.
I tried setting all the cores to 40x, still nothing. I searched a bit, I might have to update my motherboard's bios to fix come compatibility issue with W10 apparently, but I don't really feel like doing that. Shame. :
If anybody has another solution I'm all ears.
Dude, a mid-tier graphics card today is like a 1060. You have a 6 series. Of course it will make a difference. A HUGE difference.
Simply upgrading to 8 cores isn't going to do much, if anything.
That is an old ass system. I'd get a new mobo, CPU, GPU and unless you're getting old stuff to replace your old stuff you'll need DDR4 memory as well. Plenty of affordable options in all those categories though. Power supply you may be able to keep depending on what it is. Disks you can obviously keep.
It is time, my son. Join us in the new era of PC gaming!