Killer Queen
Banned
So I've got everything set up and working, installed my OS onto my SSD, but in the My PC spot only the SSD shows up. What's going on?
You need to go into computer management then disk management and format and initialize your other drives.So I've got everything set up and working, installed my OS onto my SSD, but in the My PC spot only the SSD shows up. What's going on?
Thanks!You need to go into computer management then disk management and format and initialize your other drives.
Yeah I think Volta will end up being what 1080 Ti is now - $700-$800. Obviously it'll perform better - question is just how much better - but if you're willing to spend that much now, then you could wait 6 months and get an even better card. My rule is within 6 months I'll usually wait.
If you don't wait, I say still shoot for the Ti now.
Also one thing I need to confirm is WiFi connectivity since I don't have access to an ethernet connection. Do I need to buy some sort of Wifi adapter as well?
Unless your motherboard comes with a wifi antenna included, you'll have to find another solution. You can either get PCI wifi cards or a USB wifi adapter. I got a motherboard that came with wifi for this exact reason, but if you had to go with one of the other two alternatives, I think PCI cards are generally more reliable than USB adapters.
You could use an android phone if you wanted to. Just have it connect to your desired wireless access point, plug it to your PC via usb and enable USB tethering on the phone. An adapter or motherboard with wifi support would obviously be more convenient thoughAlso one thing I need to confirm is WiFi connectivity since I don't have access to an ethernet connection. Do I need to buy some sort of Wifi adapter as well?
So yesterday was the day! I finally built my PC and I'm loving it. Need some recommendations of games to test this bad boy out!
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/6VHpCy
Sweet. Got any pics? What monitor are you using with it?
Well since I didn't have any complaints and one of the sales on the items I had on my list was ending I went ahead and pulled to trigger! Everything should be here within a week or so hopefully.
I am going to check with my school and see if I can somehow snag a cheap copy of Windows 10 (they sell it for $13 for staff... wonder if TA + PhD student would be enough to get that price haha)
Good stuff. What are you doing your phd in?
Broadly it's about using satellite imagery to monitor forest health in southern Ontario. This computer is mainly for gaming but it will be helpful for doing some of the more intense imagery analysis stuff when at home as well.
Rad, sounds fun. What school? I did my PhD at Western.
University of Toronto Mississauga!
Just moved here recently after spending 2 years at Queens for my Masters. I remember they don't like Western there. Saw some undergrads with Wuck Festern shirts on every so often haha.
My friend just sent me this link on amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N0L41N7/?tag=neogaf0e-20
i7-7700 for $24. What do you guys make of it?
Third party seller lol
Third party seller lol
I'm not too familiar with these third party sellers. Are they just gonna send an empty box or are they gonna cancel orders? I thought it would be safe even if I ended up cancelling because it's through amazon, not something like ebay.
Current PC specs:
MSI Armor 1060 6GB
Intel 7600k i5
Corsair Vengeance 16gb RAM (2X 8GB)
ASRock Z270 ProM
Goal: 144hz gaming
Hey there folks. I'm looking for a GPU and Monitor upgrade in the next few months. I've pretty much decided on grabbing a 1070ti if those rumors turn out to be true. If not I'm going to go with a 1080.
I'm currently running on a 1080p/60hz screen and I want to upgrade. Preferably to a 1440/144hz monitor that will last me a while. Would a 1070ti (or 1080 if the 1070ti doesn't exist) be good enough to run games at high/ultra settings on a 1440/144 monitor or should I settle for a 1080/144 screen?
Thank you for your advice.
Current PC specs:
MSI Armor 1060 6GB
Intel 7600k i5
Corsair Vengeance 16gb RAM (2X 8GB)
ASRock Z270 ProM
Goal: 144hz gaming
Hey there folks. I'm looking for a GPU and Monitor upgrade in the next few months. I've pretty much decided on grabbing a 1070ti if those rumors turn out to be true. If not I'm going to go with a 1080.
I'm currently running on a 1080p/60hz screen and I want to upgrade. Preferably to a 1440/144hz monitor that will last me a while. Would a 1070ti (or 1080 if the 1070ti doesn't exist) be good enough to run games at high/ultra settings on a 1440/144 monitor or should I settle for a 1080/144 screen?
Thank you for your advice.
I'm not even sure a 1080 can do Ultra+1440p+144Hz consistently. I'd be surprised if a 1070 Ti can... But you'd need to wait for benchmarks.
If you stick to high settings instead of ultra, a 1080 will be great for what you're wanting. We really can't say much about the 1070 Ti without seeing benchmarks, but my guess is that you'd be disappointed with the result considering you'll probably be able to get a 1080 for $50 more.
Oof, this isn't what I was hoping for haha. Would a 1080 be fine for 1080p/144hz at high/ultra? I can stick with my current resolution but want to hit 144hz if possible. I'd like the GPU to last me at least two years so I suppose using a standard resolution like 1080 will help with longevity. Thank you!
Lots of Coffee Lake news out today. Release date is October 5th. Full reviews and benchmarks go up October 5th as well. I won't be replacing my Ryzen 1700, but I'm excited to see the benchmarks.
Oof, this isn't what I was hoping for haha. Would a 1080 be fine for 1080p/144hz at high/ultra? I can stick with my current resolution but want to hit 144hz if possible. I'd like the GPU to last me at least two years so I suppose using a standard resolution like 1080 will help with longevity. Thank you!
Oof, this isn't what I was hoping for haha. Would a 1080 be fine for 1080p/144hz at high/ultra? I can stick with my current resolution but want to hit 144hz if possible. I'd like the GPU to last me at least two years so I suppose using a standard resolution like 1080 will help with longevity. Thank you!
So as someone who is just getting into the PC building scene... this is Intels response to Ryzens current line of CPUs?
Looking at the prices (from https://www.theverge.com/circuitbre...-desktop-processors-faster-gaming-performance) it looks like the...
i7-8700, with six cores / 12 threads and clocked at 3.2GHz (with a boost of up to 4.6GHz) for approximately $303 USD is the "equivalent" to the Ryzen 5 1600? It at least seems so from the info there. Why is it much more expensive then (I just bought the 1600 for about $210 USD)? Is it the better overclocking speed or something else we don't know about until benchmarks?
Just trying to learn how this all works haha.
Supposedly the 8700 will do 4.3 GHz on all cores. If that's true it should be a fair bit faster than the ryzen 5, I would think.This is Intel's response, yes. I use the word "response" loosely, as it seems like Intel likely had this somewhat planned anyway, although there are definite indicators that this line was a bit rushed forward by Intel due to being modesty caught off-guard by the success of Ryzen.
There is no clear comparison to the Ryzen 1600 unfortunately, but I'd say your assessment is generally correct. It seems like the i7-8700 would be that comparison, but the 8700 can't be overclocked (the "k" at the end of Intel CPUs indicates if the CPU can be overclocked or not), so even though it matches the Ryzen 1600 in number of cores/threads, my guess is that an overclocked Ryzen 1600 will generally outperform the un-overclockable 8700. Hard to say without benchmarks.
So, the reason Intel CPUs cost more is 1) Intel has generally had significant market share leadership, so they can get away with it, 2) a lack of competition from AMD, and 3) because Intel's CPUs on a per core basis tend to be faster than AMD's Ryzen line on a per core basis. This is especially a true statement for the "k" series of Intel CPUs which can be overclocked. I'm not so confident that the 8700, which can't be overclocked, will really compete with the Ryzen 1600... and even if it does, it'd need to be quite a bit better to justify the >$100 price difference.
Basically, you're essentially correct with your post, except that the 8700 cannot be overclocked because it isn't an "unlocked" (i.e., "k") processor. The 8700k, however, is unlocked and thus it can be overclocked. It'll be a beast of a CPU I am guessing, but whether the price of the 8700k can be justified is yet to be seen. Gotta wait for dem benchmarks.
This is Intel's response, yes. I use the word "response" loosely, as it seems like Intel likely had this somewhat planned anyway, although there are definite indicators that this line was a bit rushed forward by Intel due to being modesty caught off-guard by the success of Ryzen.
There is no clear comparison to the Ryzen 1600 unfortunately, but I'd say your assessment is generally correct. It seems like the i7-8700 would be that comparison, but the 8700 can't be overclocked (the "k" at the end of Intel CPUs indicates if the CPU can be overclocked or not), so even though it matches the Ryzen 1600 in number of cores/threads, my guess is that an overclocked Ryzen 1600 will generally outperform the un-overclockable 8700. Hard to say without benchmarks.
So, the reason Intel CPUs cost more is 1) Intel has generally had significant market share leadership, so they can get away with it, 2) a lack of competition from AMD, and 3) because Intel's CPUs on a per core basis tend to be faster than AMD's Ryzen line on a per core basis. This is especially a true statement for the "k" series of Intel CPUs which can be overclocked. I'm not so confident that the 8700, which can't be overclocked, will really compete with the Ryzen 1600... and even if it does, it'd need to be quite a bit better to justify the >$100 price difference.
Basically, you're essentially correct with your post, except that the 8700 cannot be overclocked because it isn't an "unlocked" (i.e., "k") processor. The 8700k, however, is unlocked and thus it can be overclocked. It'll be a beast of a CPU I am guessing, but whether the price of the 8700k can be justified is yet to be seen. Gotta wait for dem benchmarks.
That's how much it'll boost for a single core. For 2 cores, 4.5ghz, and for a workload using mores cores than that 4.3ghz. Basically it's easier to get high clocks when you don't have to ramp up all your cores.Okay great thanks! So what do they mean by this bit from the 8700 description: "with a boost of up to 4.6GHz"
I interpreted it as how much you could overclock it but I guess that means something else if it cannot be overclocked?
That's how much it'll boost for a single core. For 2 cores, 4.5ghz, and for a workload using mores cores than that 4.3ghz. Basically it's easier to get high clocks when you don't have to ramp up all your cores.
So I'm having some trouble picking out parts for my GF's computer for an upcoming surprise birthday/christmas present. I have carefully figured out a couple of the basics for things she would like in her first desktop without her knowing: 1) she would like to be white 2) she would like the box to be small. I have decided not to get her a graphics card yet because she gets her gaming fix via switch and she mainly needs a solid working desktop for school. Here's what I have picked out knowing this:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/ZzdvXH
I really want to get her that Phanteks Evolv mini tower, however, I'm already a little bit above my budget of $500 and I don't want to push it. I essentially want to build her the fastest PC possible that allows me to get that case for less than $500. Any ideas on where I could cut some costs? The cheaper the better, really.
Man I haven't stepped into one of these threads in a while... probably quick question.
I've got an OC'd 4670k to 4.5ghz stable. I've been eyeing a 1080ti for a few days, coming from a 980ti. I probably don't need to upgrade CPU too right? Benchmarks tell me my CPU isn't too far off and probably isn't worth the extra $600ish, considering I'd have to basically start from the ground up. I haven't been following CPU advancements at all for a few years now. This PC is only used for gaming.