The only thing asinine about this conversation is the obvious fickleness in whatever rationale you've conjured to differentiate Democrat and Republican presidents and apparently excuse the blatant, heinous crimes of someone like Barack Obama. I mean, now it's the "beliefs" of a candidate that makes him/her and not his/her actual record? Obama could have a fluffy heart of progressivism, Marxism, or be a straight up anarchist for all I care. It wouldn't for a second distinguish him from his predecessors or competitors in any substantial capacity.
The only thing you've been able to defend outside of your frustrated attacks against me, which are very well worded and equally entertaining, my initial utilitarian argument for voting for Clinton or any Democratic president. Thanks, I guess. The ACA and marriage equality and maybe Cuba, unless that was some other poster, just don't cut it.