• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ice Cube turned down $9 million to avoid getting a Covid_Vaccinne

Status
Not open for further replies.

dave_d

Member
The original vaccine only worked up to 100% on the original strain of the virus. By the time the vaccine came out, most people were getting infected by the mutated strains. Not the OG. Which is why effectiveness varied and not as good as what was sold to us.
Wasn't the other part that the vaccine only really worked for about 6 months? (Which would have been ok if there was a covid season but there isn't.) Plus the mutated strains were far less dangerous. (So in effect we ended up doing the Greater Barrington, the west just used poor people in Africa to do it. )Beyond that Ice Cube is 54 so I think there's an increased chance of a poor outcome but not huge.(Not sure if he's over weight or not.) FWIW I've had covid as well and I was vaccinated but not boosted. (Got the vaccine in June of 21, got covid in 22. Almost certainly a mutated strain. The second dose of the vaccine made me sick for a day, covid made me sick for about 2. I've definitely been a lot sicker from other illnesses than covid but I've never had the initial strain either.)
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
That´s a completly different topic, though: You can´t compare MRNA with normal vaccines.
Not completely different. You can compare the two. They both have slightly different ways of achieving the same goal. At this point, there is overwhelming data that shows that out of the billions of people who got mRNA vaccines, relatively few had major side effects.
 

BadBurger

Many “Whelps”! Handle It!
Wasn't the other part that the vaccine only really worked for about 6 months? (Which would have been ok if there was a covid season but there isn't.) Plus the mutated strains were far less dangerous. (So in effect we ended up doing the Greater Barrington, the west just used poor people in Africa to do it. )Beyond that Ice Cube is 54 so I think there's an increased chance of a poor outcome but not huge.(Not sure if he's over weight or not.) FWIW I've had covid as well and I was vaccinated but not boosted. (Got the vaccine in June of 21, got covid in 22. Almost certainly a mutated strain. The second dose of the vaccine made me sick for a day, covid made me sick for about 2. I've definitely been a lot sicker from other illnesses than covid but I've never had the initial strain either.)

Yea, we got lucky in that the mutations early on were far more infectious, but also far less lethal. There's also the fact that a majority of people were eventually exposed, vaccinated or not, just like with the common cold. So by the time the second batch of vaccines were being crafted to target the new strains most everyone had some level of immunity.
 

UnNamed

Banned
Are you posting with a time machine or something? Because I used to feel the same way at first. Even while I was never in favor of mandates, I still didn't want to be anywhere near people who weren't vaccinated.

Citing Matrix "We are here not because we are free but because we are not free".
Thw assumption that be free means "I do what I want" is wrong.
We are not free when there is an up and a down.
We are not free when we live in a exosystem.
We are not free when we live with another person, let alone that "we live in a society".
People around affect me anyway with their choice. Stupid choices will hit me harder.
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
I think its the RFK Jr. effect. Hes an anti vaxxer and its brought back a lot of the anti-vax talk.

It sucks but i dont think this is ever going away.
 

K2D

Banned
It's so weird that the anti vax stuff blew up with COVID. I mean, we all went our entire lives understanding vaccines and taking them as kids or during the winter months to stave off truly horrifying afflictions like small pox, and yet COVID turned a bunch of otherwise rational people into conspiracy weirdos who refuse to acknowledge science.

These things will pass in time. Still frustrating to see.
IDIOTS + “SOCIAL MEDIA“ + ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE

We've always had idiots, superstitious people will always crop up.. We had a small anti vax movement, but what's new is we have social media and the following echo chamber/ no one to call out their bullshit and all of a sudden a once-in-a-century pandemic.

It was bound to happen.
 

pel1300

Member
So glad I didn't get it. I was living in Mexico from late 2020 through mid 2022. In Mexico it was back to normal life long before the vaccines came along, so by then no one really cared. And by the time I returned to the US late last year, no one cared here anymore. It was insane, the vaxx vs unvaxxed hysteria going on in the US+Europe+Canada in 2021.

I'm crossing my fingers for my little niece and nephew who got it + boosters. They are 8 and 5. Don't know what my sister was thinking - she home schools them because she doesn't trust the education system, but never questioned anything throughout covid.
 
Last edited:

dave_d

Member
Yea, we got lucky in that the mutations early on were far more infectious, but also far less lethal. There's also the fact that a majority of people were eventually exposed, vaccinated or not, just like with the common cold. So by the time the second batch of vaccines were being crafted to target the new strains most everyone had some level of immunity.
True. I mean back then we heard that whole thing about diseases mutating to spread easier and less virulent. However I think I read somewhere that the study that suggests that is not all that well established and it might have gotten worse. (Still I found it ironic after everything said against greater barrington they ended up doing it accidentally, just using the poor people of the world to do it.)
 

Hugare

Member
Got the vaccine still got COVID. It didn't do shit.

Also pretty sure the vaccine gave me dermatographia

COVID vaccine wasnt for immunity, but to make the symptons less harmful

Immunity was never its goal
 

daveonezero

Banned
COVID vaccine wasnt for immunity, but to make the symptons less harmful

Immunity was never its goal
That isn’t what experts were saying at first….so why do they get to lie and compel you to take it and then back track and never admit they made a mistake?

“Stops infection stops the spreading.”

The symptoms were bad for 99% of people and were never serious.
 

Hugare

Member
That isn’t what experts were saying at first….so why do they get to lie and compel you to take it and then back track and never admit they made a mistake?

“Stops infection stops the spreading.”

The symptoms were bad for 99% of people and were never serious.
There were a bunch of "COVID experts" during those years, but 90% of them just wanted some clout and didnt know shit

Before being vaccinated I knew that it was just to soften the symptons

People should know better where to get information from
 

MMaRsu

Member
Ice cube is an absolute idiot, has been for years.

With his Egyptian Kings shit on Twitter and such
 

Hugare

Member
the highest paid government official wasn’t an expert?
Not necessarily?

My president and its officials (Brazil) were recommending a medicine for malaria against COVID

No proven efficiency whatsoever

The medicine went out of stock in pretty much all pharmacies, a bunch of people died from it

So yeah, you would be surprised about the misinformation during COVID era. Even from "officials".
 

Mistake

Member
It is a vaccine, quite literally. A flu shot is also a vaccine, quite literally too.
Vaccines prevent infection. This got walked back about the covid shot when they started saying "it will reduce symptoms or chances of hospitalization," after all the breakthrough infections they had. Which means it's a therapeutic, and is why this issue is currently in court.

Anyway, the covid shot will keep coming up for the next 10 years, because, well, vaccines usually need 10 years worth of data.
 
Last edited:

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
Vaccines prevent infection. This got walked back about the covid shot when they started saying "it will reduce symptoms or chances of hospitalization," after all the breakthrough infections they had. Which means it's a therapeutic, and is why this issue is currently in court.

Anyway, the covid shot will keep coming up for the next 10 years, because, well, vaccines usually need 10 years worth of data.

COVID was still new. They were still learning about it. It wasn't like the flu which has been known and studied for decades. COVID-19 JUST came into existence. So yeah, you'll make mistakes and have to walk some things back. Especially when you're put on a near impossible timetable to vaccinate the entire US/World population.
 

Mistake

Member
COVID was still new. They were still learning about it. It wasn't like the flu which has been known and studied for decades. COVID-19 JUST came into existence. So yeah, you'll make mistakes and have to walk some things back. Especially when you're put on a near impossible timetable to vaccinate the entire US/World population.
Saying you didn't know isn't a good enough excuse for pretending like you did. (Not you deaf, you know what I mean)

But this is also why I didn't take it. Obvious things were rushed and people were in a panic. Prime recipe for mistakes to happen
 
Last edited:
Vaccines prevent infection. This got walked back about the covid shot when they started saying "it will reduce symptoms or chances of hospitalization," after all the breakthrough infections they had. Which means it's a therapeutic, and is why this issue is currently in court.

Anyway, the covid shot will keep coming up for the next 10 years, because, well, vaccines usually need 10 years worth of data.
Much of that 10 years is due red tape: the time it takes to enroll patients and for the FDA to review data, etc. The FDA has their plates full with hundreds of other trials and drug applications.

So the important number isn't how much time has elapsed but how many patients have received the shot/vaccine (I don't care what it's called), which at this point is in the tens of millions.

Even if there is vaccine injury and people are having heart attacks or strokes, the numbers are exceedingly low which makes it medically worth the risk in a risk/benefit situation.
 
Last edited:

Mistake

Member
Much of that 10 years is due to the time it takes to enroll patients and for the FDA to review data, etc. The FDA has their plates full with hundreds of other trials and drug applications.

So the important number isn't how much time has elapsed but how many patients have received the shot/vaccine (I don't care what it's called), which at this point is in the tens of millions.

Even if there is vaccine injury and people are having heart attacks or strokes, the numbers are exceedingly low which makes it medically worth the risk in a risk/benefit situation.
The 10 year is also to evaluate long term risks, which will have a much larger sample size this time around compared to any usual rollout
 
The 10 year is also to evaluate long term risks, which will have a much larger sample size this time around compared to any usual rollout
I don't believe that's true. Yes, there are "long term studies" but that has more to do with effectiveness and less to do with SAEs.

There is no requirement for any drug to test safety in such a long timeframe.
 

daveonezero

Banned
In the US 30% of people never took the jab.

huge drop off of people who received more than 2.

For something that is so scary and the doses only last 6 months it seems like most people aren’t even current or “fully vaccinated” anymore.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom