nib95 said:So their Gaming Division is at risk, despite them mentioning they needed to catch up to Nintendo? Seriously OP....
Short straws or what.
From the OT post that preceded this one:Psychotext said:Quoted from the earnings releases thread:
Code:Sony Nintendo Microsoft Industry Y/E 1998 $902,811,090 $1,023,333,867 $1,926,144,957 Y/E 1999 $1,102,563,557 $1,301,350,000 $2,403,913,557 Y/E 2000 $722,738,949 $1,368,207,547 $2,090,946,497 Y/E 2001 -$449,776,290 $677,576,000 $227,799,710 Y/E 2002 $629,101,056 $895,872,180 -$1,135,000,000 $389,973,237 Y/E 2003 $935,569,253 $834,333,333 -$1,191,000,000 $578,902,586 Y/E 2004 $627,195,212 $993,161,303 -$1,337,000,000 $283,356,515 Y/E 2005 $419,888,799 $1,056,056,202 -$539,000,000 $936,945,001 Y/E 2006 $69,129,058 $774,478,055 -$1,339,000,000 -$495,392,887 Y/E 2007 -$1,970,923,859 $1,914,666,388 -$1,969,000,000 -$2,025,257,471 Y/E 2008 -$1,079,994,103 $4,322,637,887 $426,000,000 $3,668,643,783 Y/E 09Q1 $51,113,208 $1,124,452,830 $178,000,000 $1,353,566,038 Y/E 09Q2 -$379,471,154 $1,278,759,615 Total $1,579,944,775 $17,564,885,209 -$6,906,000,000 $11,339,541,523 Full Year Average $173,482,066 $1,378,333,888 -$1,012,000,000 $907,815,953 Profitable Years 8 11 1 9 Non Profitable Years 3 0 6 2 Average in Loss Year -$1,166,898,084 N/A -$1,251,666,667 -$1,260,325,179 Average in Profit Year $676,124,622 $1,378,333,888 $426,000,000 $1,389,625,094
I'm not sure where the $5bn figure is coming from.
Mutanthands said:Man, I just skimmed through some of the quarterly reports that Tak provided in his post, and I'm finding it harder to believe that something is not going to happen at the game division.
here are the numbers for the game division operating income/loss (per fiscal quarter):
Q2 2008 -$379 million
Q1 2008 +$51 million
Q4 2007 -$1,245 million (1.2 Billion)
Q3 2007 +$113 million
Q2 2007 -$841 Million
Q1 2007 -$237 Million
Q4 2006 -$1969 Million (1.9 Billion)
Q3 2006 -$455 Million
Q2 2006 -$369 Million (pre-PS3)
The massive bleeding Sony is suffering through the gaming division has never struck me until I looked at all the numbers together.
Gaming kept Sony going for many years. But look at those numbers. Does Sony have the cash reserves to bleed like this much longer? Once they finally get the cost of the PS3 down to reasonable levels, can they manage the sales volume and game sales to bounce back, considering that the Wii is the mass market console of choice this generation?
You can make a financial argument for cutting your losses and running away. I doubt Sony would do that, but don't be suprised if some big changes come along.
http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/index.html
Edited to add a link to the financial reports.
Always-honest said:so a non backwards compatible, 1 usb port, no SD slot, 10 GB HD Ps3 mini all made of mediocre plastic on the way?
Terrell said:We're in a worldwide recession, the rules of the game have changed. Were it not for that, I would show much less concern.
Second, even with a decrease in parts, PS3 is STILL sold at a loss.
Lastly, they have a $5 BILLION debt to recover. That doesn't wash away overnight. Not even the PS2 had debts like that to recover, and it took 2 years for that platform to recover its losses, being magnitudes more successful.
So I don't honestly see how you can think everything's all roses.
xabre said:Geez five billion in debt and operating at a consistent loss. Good luck Sony getting loans from financial institutions going forward in the midst of the worst financial crisis since the 1930's. And in this environment who is going to want to buy their bonds or stock? They're a ticking time bomb.
Those numbers aren't right though...Terrell said:From the OT post that preceded this one:
Private Hoffman said:Worst case scenario for the gaming division: Sony can't afford to cut the price of the PS3 in order to stay as competitive.
xabre said:Geez five billion in debt and operating at a consistent loss. Good luck Sony getting loans from financial institutions going forward in the midst of the worst financial crisis since the 1930's. And in this environment who is going to want to buy their bonds or stock? They're a ticking time bomb.
Koya Tabata, a Credit Suisse analyst, recently warned investors that the restructuring of Sony is perilously overdue and must be radical. Sony management needs to make a rapid shift in its business model to one driven by earnings in the content business, he said.
The focus of research and development must be on software
Then you failed arithmetic. Those earnings and losses are CUMULATIVE.Psychotext said:Still not seeing $5bn...
Check the numbers, they aren't right...Terrell said:Then you failed arithmetic. Those earnings and losses are CUMULATIVE.
Err.... Yes?KernelPanic said:People somehow conclude cuts to their gaming division from this ???
Petrae said:That's what concerns me, as a PS3 owner. Sony is going to run out of capital eventually, and operating at levels of loss like this will only serve to expedite the process. Then what? Merger? Takeover? Bankruptcy?
Son of Godzilla said:Err.... Yes?
LBP would have sold better on Wii.
lawblob said:Why do Sony fans always say this? Why do so many people around here say that Sony "can't afford to cut price."? Where are you people getting this information? Do you have a mole at Sony HQ who tells you this stuff, or is this just speculative forum bullshitting? Have you personally seen Sony's projections of increased sales from a price decrease relative to revenue lost? If not, then how the hell do you KNOW that Sony can't afford to cut the price of the system?
yeah, what was sony thinking not putting LBP on WiiSon of Godzilla said:Err.... Yes?
LBP would have sold better on Wii.
Ummm, I did, just did right now with a calculator. Add up all the red ink together, then subtract the two black-ink sections, and you get about $5.3 billion.Psychotext said:Check the numbers, they aren't right...
Not the adding up. The actual figures from the financial reports.Terrell said:Ummm, I did, just did right now with a calculator. Add up all the red ink together, then subtract the two black-ink sections, and you get about $5.3 billion.
Son of Godzilla said:Err.... Yes?
LBP would have sold better on Wii.
Private Hoffman said:I said the worst case scenario is that Sony wouldn't be able to cut cost... I never said that I KNEW Sony couldn't cut cost in the future...
Reading comprehension...
Forsete said:You do know that Sony as a whole has been making profits, right?
Sorry, just checked the IR reports that are listed in the posts. The numbers are right, maybe you should go check, cuz it's laid out in the PDFs in the link, direct from Sony IR.Psychotext said:Not the adding up. The actual figures from the financial reports.
Trust me... I spent a shitload of time working on that post in the earnings thread.
lawblob said:Im' not specifically accusing you of holding that position, im' just saying in general, that sentiment gets tossed around a lot on GAF, but I have never seen anybody back it up with any numbers. Would Sony be better off in the long run deeply cutting PS3 system price right now? Im' not sure, but I would like to see some info on it.
lawblob said:Im' not specifically accusing you of holding that position, im' just saying in general, that sentiment gets tossed around a lot on GAF, but I have never seen anybody back it up with any numbers. Would Sony be better off in the long run deeply cutting PS3 system price right now? Im' not sure, but I would like to see some info on it.
NintendoTogepi said:I'd love if Sony's gaming division went under. The meltdowns would be priceless :lol
dfyb said:yeah, what was sony thinking not putting LBP on Wii
xabre said:I don't see it. I see significant loss occurring over the past few years based on the posted financial details. Explain what leads you to making this claim?
yeah that's a totally fair take on the logic he employed there. a+nib95 said:They should try and put Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, GT5, God of War 3 etc on the Wii too.
While we're at it, let Microsoft know their games could sell better on the Wii. In-fact, tell all the 360/PS3 developers that!
The numbers shown per quarter, which are cumulative, match up exactly with the PDFs on that site. EXACTLY. And I only ever listed the $5 billion loss as specific to the gaming division.Forsete said:Oh geez.
Those numbers are from the gaming division. You can check the numbers for Sony Global here: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/index.html, for example, FY2006 Sony Global went plus 126.3 billion JPY. FY2007 plus 369.4 billion JPY.
lawblob said:Wait for KZ2!
Am I doing it right?
Terrell said:The numbers shown per quarter, which are cumulative, match up exactly with the PDFs on that site. EXACTLY.
boom.gifNemesisPrime said:Nope.. you forgot a KZ2 animated gif.
Terrell said:Sorry, just checked the IR reports that are listed in the posts. The numbers are right, maybe you should go check, cuz it's laid out in the PDFs in the link, direct from Sony IR.
lawblob said:Why do Sony fans always say this? Why do so many people around here say that Sony "can't afford to cut price."? Where are you people getting this information? Do you have a mole at Sony HQ who tells you this stuff, or is this just speculative forum bullshitting? Have you personally seen Sony's projections of increased sales from a price decrease relative to revenue lost? If not, then how the hell do you KNOW that Sony can't afford to cut the price of the system?
unless it isn't $5 billionThunder Monkey said:I don't especially want to see anyone lose their job... and I'd hope the PS3 wouldn't be that big of a burden on Sony, but $5 billion is $5 billion.
Well, considering the original post highlights a potential plan to make deep cuts to non-profiting groups within the company, and the gaming division is posting $5.3 billion in losses in 2 YEARS, I don't see why other numbers are being dragged into the discussion. Yeah, Sony's got other profitable divisions, but it doesn't detract from the serious financial problem the gaming division has and a risk that the rest of Sony's business can't recover that, should the company actually be hitting a worst-case scenario as that article posted suggests.Forsete said:WE ARE TALKING DIFFERENT NUMBERS.
Get it now?
Rez>You said:yeah that's a totally fair take on the logic he employed there. a+
Forsete said:Oh geez.
Jinfash said:Hey dipshit those are real people working there, people that need to pay bills and feed their kids. People posting on this board.
When you grow up and join the real world you will understand. Now you can go back to being 12.
Edit: Caught you before your stealth edit.
Terrell said:You're dragging in factors that pose no relevance to the topic at hand.
Suburban Cowboy said:how long was it into the Gamecubes life before people started saying Nintendo would go 3rd party?